胆管手术中的视频胆道镜检查。

Acta chirurgica Hungarica Pub Date : 1999-01-01
G Csáky, J Bezsilla, D Tóth
{"title":"胆管手术中的视频胆道镜检查。","authors":"G Csáky,&nbsp;J Bezsilla,&nbsp;D Tóth","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors report on common bile duct explorations performed in 92 patients and in one patient laparoscopically. In their practice usually ERCP and EST were attempted first when bile duct stones were suspected. Open choledochotomy was performed when the endoscopic approach was unsuccessful, or a stone was detected during selective intraoperative cholangiography. In 16 cases intraoperative video-choledochoscopy was performed. The thing that increased the average operating time by 47 minutes. In 4 patients in this group residual stones were detected postoperatively, presumably because of the inexperience of the surgeons with the use of the choledochoscope. Postoperative cholangiography raised the suspicion of a residual stone altogether in 8 cases. Postoperative ERCP was negative in 2 instances, EST and stone extraction were successful in 3 patients, but unsuccessful in 3 patients. In these last cases a successful reoperation was made in one, ESWL and dissolution therapy were performed in two patients. The authors advise to learn the technique of laparoscopic removal of the bile duct stones and the application of guide-wire, Dormia basket, Fogarty balloon catheter, and balloon dilatator. According to the data of the literature, the one stage laparoscopic procedure is successful in most of the patients, more comfortable, and cost saving.</p>","PeriodicalId":76967,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Hungarica","volume":"38 2","pages":"139-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video-choledochoscopy in bile duct surgery.\",\"authors\":\"G Csáky,&nbsp;J Bezsilla,&nbsp;D Tóth\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors report on common bile duct explorations performed in 92 patients and in one patient laparoscopically. In their practice usually ERCP and EST were attempted first when bile duct stones were suspected. Open choledochotomy was performed when the endoscopic approach was unsuccessful, or a stone was detected during selective intraoperative cholangiography. In 16 cases intraoperative video-choledochoscopy was performed. The thing that increased the average operating time by 47 minutes. In 4 patients in this group residual stones were detected postoperatively, presumably because of the inexperience of the surgeons with the use of the choledochoscope. Postoperative cholangiography raised the suspicion of a residual stone altogether in 8 cases. Postoperative ERCP was negative in 2 instances, EST and stone extraction were successful in 3 patients, but unsuccessful in 3 patients. In these last cases a successful reoperation was made in one, ESWL and dissolution therapy were performed in two patients. The authors advise to learn the technique of laparoscopic removal of the bile duct stones and the application of guide-wire, Dormia basket, Fogarty balloon catheter, and balloon dilatator. According to the data of the literature, the one stage laparoscopic procedure is successful in most of the patients, more comfortable, and cost saving.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta chirurgica Hungarica\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"139-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta chirurgica Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者报告了92例患者和1例腹腔镜患者的胆总管探查。在实践中,当怀疑胆管结石时,通常首先尝试ERCP和EST。当内镜入路不成功或选择性术中胆道造影发现结石时,进行开放胆道切开术。术中行视频胆道镜检查16例。让平均手术时间增加了47分钟。本组4例患者术后检出残留结石,可能是由于外科医生在使用胆道镜方面缺乏经验。术后胆道造影提示8例疑似残留结石。术后ERCP阴性2例,EST及取石成功3例,取石失败3例。在最后的病例中,1例成功再手术,2例进行ESWL和溶解治疗。建议学习腹腔镜下胆管结石取石术及导丝、Dormia篮、Fogarty球囊导管、球囊扩张器的应用。根据文献资料,一期腹腔镜手术在大多数患者中是成功的,更舒适,节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video-choledochoscopy in bile duct surgery.

The authors report on common bile duct explorations performed in 92 patients and in one patient laparoscopically. In their practice usually ERCP and EST were attempted first when bile duct stones were suspected. Open choledochotomy was performed when the endoscopic approach was unsuccessful, or a stone was detected during selective intraoperative cholangiography. In 16 cases intraoperative video-choledochoscopy was performed. The thing that increased the average operating time by 47 minutes. In 4 patients in this group residual stones were detected postoperatively, presumably because of the inexperience of the surgeons with the use of the choledochoscope. Postoperative cholangiography raised the suspicion of a residual stone altogether in 8 cases. Postoperative ERCP was negative in 2 instances, EST and stone extraction were successful in 3 patients, but unsuccessful in 3 patients. In these last cases a successful reoperation was made in one, ESWL and dissolution therapy were performed in two patients. The authors advise to learn the technique of laparoscopic removal of the bile duct stones and the application of guide-wire, Dormia basket, Fogarty balloon catheter, and balloon dilatator. According to the data of the literature, the one stage laparoscopic procedure is successful in most of the patients, more comfortable, and cost saving.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信