[启动技术对顺阿曲库铵起效谱的影响]。

Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation Pub Date : 1999-01-01
W Hoffmann, U Schwarz, M Ruoff, M Georgieff, G Geldner
{"title":"[启动技术对顺阿曲库铵起效谱的影响]。","authors":"W Hoffmann,&nbsp;U Schwarz,&nbsp;M Ruoff,&nbsp;M Georgieff,&nbsp;G Geldner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compared to atracurium, cisatracurium releases less laudanosine and histamine, but it has a longer onset time. The primary objective of this study was a blinded, randomized comparison of intubation scores and onset times of a threefold ED 95 of cisatracurium using the priming technique with two priming substances cisatracurium itself and pancuronium. To test the effect of priming with cisatracurium or pancuronium on the onset of cisatracurium, 45 patients were anaesthetised with 0.15-0.25 mg/kg alfentanil, 0.25-0.3 mg/kg edomidate i.v. and O2/N2O, and were randomisely divided into one of three groups. After induction, 15 patients were primed with sodium chloride and thereafter received 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium, 15 patients were primed with 0.01 mg/kg cisatracurium, another 15 patients were primed with 0.015 mg/kg pancuronium and the last two groups received 0.14 mg/kg cisatracurium three minutes later. Neuromuscular response was monitored by adductor pollicis electromyogram (EMG) by stimulating in a TOF pattern. Times for T1 reduction to 75%, 50%, 25% and 0% and T1 recovery to 25% were taken. Intubation was performed 120 seconds after the main relaxant dose and scored in four grades. The two priming groups showed a significantly faster onset of neuromuscular blockade than the control group (cisatracurium priming group: T1 = 0: 178.4 +/- 16.3 sec., pancuronium priming group 171.2 +/- 15.3 sec. vs. control group: T1 = 0: 205.5 +/- 18.9 sec.). Both primed groups showed no significantly better intubation scores, compared with the control group. Using the priming principle, cisatracurium will give good intubation scores 120 seconds after injection with a clinical duration profile comparable to an equipotent dose of atracurium.</p>","PeriodicalId":76993,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","volume":"24 5","pages":"130-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effects of priming technique on onset profile of cisatracurium].\",\"authors\":\"W Hoffmann,&nbsp;U Schwarz,&nbsp;M Ruoff,&nbsp;M Georgieff,&nbsp;G Geldner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Compared to atracurium, cisatracurium releases less laudanosine and histamine, but it has a longer onset time. The primary objective of this study was a blinded, randomized comparison of intubation scores and onset times of a threefold ED 95 of cisatracurium using the priming technique with two priming substances cisatracurium itself and pancuronium. To test the effect of priming with cisatracurium or pancuronium on the onset of cisatracurium, 45 patients were anaesthetised with 0.15-0.25 mg/kg alfentanil, 0.25-0.3 mg/kg edomidate i.v. and O2/N2O, and were randomisely divided into one of three groups. After induction, 15 patients were primed with sodium chloride and thereafter received 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium, 15 patients were primed with 0.01 mg/kg cisatracurium, another 15 patients were primed with 0.015 mg/kg pancuronium and the last two groups received 0.14 mg/kg cisatracurium three minutes later. Neuromuscular response was monitored by adductor pollicis electromyogram (EMG) by stimulating in a TOF pattern. Times for T1 reduction to 75%, 50%, 25% and 0% and T1 recovery to 25% were taken. Intubation was performed 120 seconds after the main relaxant dose and scored in four grades. The two priming groups showed a significantly faster onset of neuromuscular blockade than the control group (cisatracurium priming group: T1 = 0: 178.4 +/- 16.3 sec., pancuronium priming group 171.2 +/- 15.3 sec. vs. control group: T1 = 0: 205.5 +/- 18.9 sec.). Both primed groups showed no significantly better intubation scores, compared with the control group. Using the priming principle, cisatracurium will give good intubation scores 120 seconds after injection with a clinical duration profile comparable to an equipotent dose of atracurium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"130-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与阿曲库铵相比,顺式阿曲库铵释放的劳达胺和组胺较少,但起效时间较长。本研究的主要目的是采用两种启动物质顺阿曲库铵和泮库溴铵的启动技术,对顺阿曲库铵的插管评分和三倍ED 95的发作时间进行盲法随机比较。为观察顺阿曲库铵或泮库溴铵对顺阿曲库铵发作的影响,45例患者分别以0.15 ~ 0.25 mg/kg阿芬太尼、0.25 ~ 0.3 mg/kg艾咪酯和O2/N2O麻醉,随机分为3组。诱导后,15例患者先灌注氯化钠,再灌注0.15 mg/kg顺阿曲库铵,15例患者灌注0.01 mg/kg顺阿曲库铵,另外15例患者灌注0.015 mg/kg顺阿曲库铵,最后两组患者3分钟后灌注0.14 mg/kg顺阿曲库铵。以TOF模式刺激拇内收肌肌电图(EMG)监测神经肌肉反应。分别取T1降至75%、50%、25%、0%和T1恢复至25%的次数。在给药120秒后插管,并按4个等级评分。两个启动组的神经肌肉阻滞起效明显快于对照组(顺阿库溴铵启动组T1 = 0: 178.4 +/- 16.3秒,泮库溴铵启动组171.2 +/- 15.3秒,对照组T1 = 0: 205.5 +/- 18.9秒)。与对照组相比,两个启动组的插管评分都没有明显提高。利用启动原理,顺阿曲库铵在注射后120秒给予良好的插管评分,其临床持续时间与同等剂量的阿曲库铵相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Effects of priming technique on onset profile of cisatracurium].

Compared to atracurium, cisatracurium releases less laudanosine and histamine, but it has a longer onset time. The primary objective of this study was a blinded, randomized comparison of intubation scores and onset times of a threefold ED 95 of cisatracurium using the priming technique with two priming substances cisatracurium itself and pancuronium. To test the effect of priming with cisatracurium or pancuronium on the onset of cisatracurium, 45 patients were anaesthetised with 0.15-0.25 mg/kg alfentanil, 0.25-0.3 mg/kg edomidate i.v. and O2/N2O, and were randomisely divided into one of three groups. After induction, 15 patients were primed with sodium chloride and thereafter received 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium, 15 patients were primed with 0.01 mg/kg cisatracurium, another 15 patients were primed with 0.015 mg/kg pancuronium and the last two groups received 0.14 mg/kg cisatracurium three minutes later. Neuromuscular response was monitored by adductor pollicis electromyogram (EMG) by stimulating in a TOF pattern. Times for T1 reduction to 75%, 50%, 25% and 0% and T1 recovery to 25% were taken. Intubation was performed 120 seconds after the main relaxant dose and scored in four grades. The two priming groups showed a significantly faster onset of neuromuscular blockade than the control group (cisatracurium priming group: T1 = 0: 178.4 +/- 16.3 sec., pancuronium priming group 171.2 +/- 15.3 sec. vs. control group: T1 = 0: 205.5 +/- 18.9 sec.). Both primed groups showed no significantly better intubation scores, compared with the control group. Using the priming principle, cisatracurium will give good intubation scores 120 seconds after injection with a clinical duration profile comparable to an equipotent dose of atracurium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信