牙科工作者对丙烯酸酯的后期斑贴试验反应。

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society Pub Date : 1999-12-01 DOI:10.1053/AJCD01000224

J F Fowler

{"title":"牙科工作者对丙烯酸酯的后期斑贴试验反应。","authors":"J F Fowler","doi":"10.1053/AJCD01000224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A dental technician developed eyelid and hand dermatitis. She had been previously patch-tested elsewhere with a sample of an acrylic material from a nail salon that reportedly was positive only after 1 month. Repeat testing with ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate gave no reaction at 48 or 96 hours, but became positive 5 weeks later. This very late reaction is probably a true allergic manifestation and not a case of active sensitization.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"10 4","pages":"224-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late patch test reaction to acrylates in a dental worker.\",\"authors\":\"J F Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/AJCD01000224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A dental technician developed eyelid and hand dermatitis. She had been previously patch-tested elsewhere with a sample of an acrylic material from a nail salon that reportedly was positive only after 1 month. Repeat testing with ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate gave no reaction at 48 or 96 hours, but became positive 5 weeks later. This very late reaction is probably a true allergic manifestation and not a case of active sensitization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"224-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/AJCD01000224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/AJCD01000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

一名牙科技师患了眼睑和手部皮炎。此前，她曾在其他地方用一家美甲沙龙的丙烯酸材料样本进行了补丁测试，据报道，一个月后才呈阳性。用丙烯酸乙酯和甲基丙烯酸甲酯重复检测48或96小时无反应，但5周后呈阳性。这种很晚的反应可能是真正的过敏表现，而不是主动致敏的情况。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Late patch test reaction to acrylates in a dental worker.

A dental technician developed eyelid and hand dermatitis. She had been previously patch-tested elsewhere with a sample of an acrylic material from a nail salon that reportedly was positive only after 1 month. Repeat testing with ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate gave no reaction at 48 or 96 hours, but became positive 5 weeks later. This very late reaction is probably a true allergic manifestation and not a case of active sensitization.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society

自引率

0.00%

发文量