在局部淋巴结试验中,载体对评估1,4-二对苯二酚相对皮肤致敏效力的影响。

L J Lea, E V Warbrick, R J Dearman, I Kimber, D A Basketter
{"title":"在局部淋巴结试验中,载体对评估1,4-二对苯二酚相对皮肤致敏效力的影响。","authors":"L J Lea,&nbsp;E V Warbrick,&nbsp;R J Dearman,&nbsp;I Kimber,&nbsp;D A Basketter","doi":"10.1053/AJCD01000213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has been validated as an alternative method for the identification of skin sensitization hazards. Contact allergens are identified as a function of proliferative responses induced in draining lymph nodes. The quantitative nature of the LLNA data also provides the opportunity of assessing relative potency by reference to dose response analyses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the current investigations, the influence of vehicle on the skin sensitization potency of a known skin sensitizer (1,4-dihydroquinone) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1, 4-dihydroquinone was tested in the LLNA using 7 different vehicle systems in each of 2 independent laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from the 2 laboratories were almost identical. LLNA dose response data were interpolated to derive the estimated concentration (EC) of 1, 4-dihydroquinone necessary to cause a three-fold stimulation of proliferation compared with controls, the EC3 value. The vehicles used and mean EC3 values obtained were: methyl ethyl ketone 0.07%, acetone 0.08%, acetone/olive oil (80/20 v/v) 0.15%, dimethyl formamide 0.22%, dimethyl sulfoxide 0.4%, and propylene glycol and acetone/saline (50/50 v/v) vehicles gave negative results. However, when tested at higher concentrations, positive results were obtained in these vehicles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data reveal that the vehicle in which a chemical is encountered in the skin can have a significant impact on a quantitative measure of skin sensitization potency. The implication is that accurate assessment of risk to humans will require an understanding of the matrix in which skin exposure is likely to occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.\",\"authors\":\"L J Lea,&nbsp;E V Warbrick,&nbsp;R J Dearman,&nbsp;I Kimber,&nbsp;D A Basketter\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/AJCD01000213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has been validated as an alternative method for the identification of skin sensitization hazards. Contact allergens are identified as a function of proliferative responses induced in draining lymph nodes. The quantitative nature of the LLNA data also provides the opportunity of assessing relative potency by reference to dose response analyses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the current investigations, the influence of vehicle on the skin sensitization potency of a known skin sensitizer (1,4-dihydroquinone) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1, 4-dihydroquinone was tested in the LLNA using 7 different vehicle systems in each of 2 independent laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from the 2 laboratories were almost identical. LLNA dose response data were interpolated to derive the estimated concentration (EC) of 1, 4-dihydroquinone necessary to cause a three-fold stimulation of proliferation compared with controls, the EC3 value. The vehicles used and mean EC3 values obtained were: methyl ethyl ketone 0.07%, acetone 0.08%, acetone/olive oil (80/20 v/v) 0.15%, dimethyl formamide 0.22%, dimethyl sulfoxide 0.4%, and propylene glycol and acetone/saline (50/50 v/v) vehicles gave negative results. However, when tested at higher concentrations, positive results were obtained in these vehicles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data reveal that the vehicle in which a chemical is encountered in the skin can have a significant impact on a quantitative measure of skin sensitization potency. The implication is that accurate assessment of risk to humans will require an understanding of the matrix in which skin exposure is likely to occur.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/AJCD01000213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/AJCD01000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小鼠局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)已被证实是一种识别皮肤致敏危害的替代方法。接触性过敏原被认为是引流淋巴结引起的增生性反应的一个功能。LLNA数据的定量性质也为参照剂量反应分析评估相对效力提供了机会。目的:在目前的研究中,评估了一种已知的皮肤致敏剂(1,4-二对苯二酚)对皮肤致敏效力的影响。方法:在2个独立的实验室分别使用7种不同的载体系统对1,4 -二对苯二酚在LLNA中的含量进行检测。结果:两个实验室的检测结果基本一致。对LLNA剂量反应数据进行插值,得出与对照组相比,引起三倍增殖刺激所需的1,4 -二对苯二酚的估计浓度(EC),即EC3值。所使用的载体和平均EC3值为:甲基乙基酮0.07%,丙酮0.08%,丙酮/橄榄油(80/20 v/v) 0.15%,二甲基甲酰胺0.22%,二甲基亚砜0.4%,丙二醇和丙酮/生理盐水(50/50 v/v)为阴性。然而,当在较高浓度下测试时,在这些车辆中获得阳性结果。结论:这些数据表明,化学物质在皮肤中接触的载体可以对皮肤致敏效力的定量测量产生重大影响。这意味着对人类风险的准确评估需要了解可能发生皮肤暴露的基质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.

Background: The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has been validated as an alternative method for the identification of skin sensitization hazards. Contact allergens are identified as a function of proliferative responses induced in draining lymph nodes. The quantitative nature of the LLNA data also provides the opportunity of assessing relative potency by reference to dose response analyses.

Objective: In the current investigations, the influence of vehicle on the skin sensitization potency of a known skin sensitizer (1,4-dihydroquinone) was assessed.

Methods: 1, 4-dihydroquinone was tested in the LLNA using 7 different vehicle systems in each of 2 independent laboratories.

Results: Results from the 2 laboratories were almost identical. LLNA dose response data were interpolated to derive the estimated concentration (EC) of 1, 4-dihydroquinone necessary to cause a three-fold stimulation of proliferation compared with controls, the EC3 value. The vehicles used and mean EC3 values obtained were: methyl ethyl ketone 0.07%, acetone 0.08%, acetone/olive oil (80/20 v/v) 0.15%, dimethyl formamide 0.22%, dimethyl sulfoxide 0.4%, and propylene glycol and acetone/saline (50/50 v/v) vehicles gave negative results. However, when tested at higher concentrations, positive results were obtained in these vehicles.

Conclusion: These data reveal that the vehicle in which a chemical is encountered in the skin can have a significant impact on a quantitative measure of skin sensitization potency. The implication is that accurate assessment of risk to humans will require an understanding of the matrix in which skin exposure is likely to occur.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信