功能评估测量(FAM)是否扩展了功能独立性测量(FIM)工具?脑卒中住院患者皮疹分析。

Journal of outcome measurement Pub Date : 1999-01-01
R T Linn, R S Blair, C V Granger, D W Harper, P A O'Hara, E Maciura
{"title":"功能评估测量(FAM)是否扩展了功能独立性测量(FIM)工具?脑卒中住院患者皮疹分析。","authors":"R T Linn,&nbsp;R S Blair,&nbsp;C V Granger,&nbsp;D W Harper,&nbsp;P A O'Hara,&nbsp;E Maciura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adding the items of the Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) to the Functional Independence Measure (FIM instrument) has been proposed as a method to extend the range of the FIM, particularly when assessing functional status in rehabilitation patients with brain injury, including stroke. It has been proposed that this approach is especially helpful in ameliorating ceiling effects when brain-injured patients have reached the end of their inpatient rehabilitation stay or are being seen in outpatient settings. In the present study, 376 consecutive stroke patients on a Canadian inpatient rehabilitation unit were concurrently administered the FIM and the FAM. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate how well the FAM items extended the difficulty range of the FIM for both the Motor and Cognitive domains. Within the Motor domain, only the FAM item assessing Community Access was found to be more difficult than extant FIM items, and this item showed some tendency to misfit with the other motor items. In the Cognitive domain, the only FAM item with a higher difficulty level than the FIM items was that assessing Employability. Notably, strict adherence to scoring guidelines for these two FAM items requires taking patients out into the community to evaluate their actual performances, a practice unlikely in the typical inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. Results indicate that use of the entire FAM as an adjunct to the FIM reduces test efficiency while providing only minimal additional protection against ceiling effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":79673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of outcome measurement","volume":"3 4","pages":"339-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the functional assessment measure (FAM) extend the functional independence measure (FIM) instrument? A rasch analysis of stroke inpatients.\",\"authors\":\"R T Linn,&nbsp;R S Blair,&nbsp;C V Granger,&nbsp;D W Harper,&nbsp;P A O'Hara,&nbsp;E Maciura\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adding the items of the Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) to the Functional Independence Measure (FIM instrument) has been proposed as a method to extend the range of the FIM, particularly when assessing functional status in rehabilitation patients with brain injury, including stroke. It has been proposed that this approach is especially helpful in ameliorating ceiling effects when brain-injured patients have reached the end of their inpatient rehabilitation stay or are being seen in outpatient settings. In the present study, 376 consecutive stroke patients on a Canadian inpatient rehabilitation unit were concurrently administered the FIM and the FAM. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate how well the FAM items extended the difficulty range of the FIM for both the Motor and Cognitive domains. Within the Motor domain, only the FAM item assessing Community Access was found to be more difficult than extant FIM items, and this item showed some tendency to misfit with the other motor items. In the Cognitive domain, the only FAM item with a higher difficulty level than the FIM items was that assessing Employability. Notably, strict adherence to scoring guidelines for these two FAM items requires taking patients out into the community to evaluate their actual performances, a practice unlikely in the typical inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. Results indicate that use of the entire FAM as an adjunct to the FIM reduces test efficiency while providing only minimal additional protection against ceiling effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of outcome measurement\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"339-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of outcome measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of outcome measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将功能评估量表(FAM)的项目添加到功能独立性量表(FIM)中,作为一种扩展FIM范围的方法,特别是在评估脑损伤(包括中风)康复患者的功能状态时。已经提出,这种方法特别有助于改善天花板效应,当脑损伤患者已经达到他们的住院康复停留期结束或正在门诊设置。在本研究中,376名连续中风患者在加拿大住院康复单位同时给予FIM和FAM。Rasch分析用于评估FAM项目在运动和认知领域扩展FIM难度范围的程度。在运动领域中,只有评估社区访问的FAM项目比现有的FIM项目更难,并且该项目显示出与其他运动项目不匹配的趋势。在认知领域,唯一比FIM项目难度更高的FAM项目是评估就业能力。值得注意的是,严格遵守这两个FAM项目的评分指南需要将患者带到社区评估他们的实际表现,这在典型的住院卒中康复单位是不可能的。结果表明,使用整个FAM作为FIM的辅助降低了测试效率,同时只提供了最小的额外保护,以防止天花板效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the functional assessment measure (FAM) extend the functional independence measure (FIM) instrument? A rasch analysis of stroke inpatients.

Adding the items of the Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) to the Functional Independence Measure (FIM instrument) has been proposed as a method to extend the range of the FIM, particularly when assessing functional status in rehabilitation patients with brain injury, including stroke. It has been proposed that this approach is especially helpful in ameliorating ceiling effects when brain-injured patients have reached the end of their inpatient rehabilitation stay or are being seen in outpatient settings. In the present study, 376 consecutive stroke patients on a Canadian inpatient rehabilitation unit were concurrently administered the FIM and the FAM. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate how well the FAM items extended the difficulty range of the FIM for both the Motor and Cognitive domains. Within the Motor domain, only the FAM item assessing Community Access was found to be more difficult than extant FIM items, and this item showed some tendency to misfit with the other motor items. In the Cognitive domain, the only FAM item with a higher difficulty level than the FIM items was that assessing Employability. Notably, strict adherence to scoring guidelines for these two FAM items requires taking patients out into the community to evaluate their actual performances, a practice unlikely in the typical inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. Results indicate that use of the entire FAM as an adjunct to the FIM reduces test efficiency while providing only minimal additional protection against ceiling effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信