在繁忙的全科执业中改进重复处方流程。使用持续质量改进方法的研究。

S Cox, P Wilcock, J Young
{"title":"在繁忙的全科执业中改进重复处方流程。使用持续质量改进方法的研究。","authors":"S Cox,&nbsp;P Wilcock,&nbsp;J Young","doi":"10.1136/qshc.8.2.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>A need to improve service to patients by reducing the time wasted by reception staff so that the 48 hour target for processing repeat prescription requests for patient collection could be achieved.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An interprofessional team was established within the practice to tackle the area of repeat prescribing which had been identified as a priority by practice reception staff. The team met four times in three months and used continuous quality improvement (CQI) methodology (including the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle) with the assistance of an external facilitator.</p><p><strong>Background and setting: </strong>A seven partner practice serving the 14,000 patients on the northern outskirts of Bournemouth including a large council estate and a substantial student population from Bournemouth University. The repeat prescribing process is computerised.</p><p><strong>Key measures for improvement: </strong>Reducing turn around times for repeat prescription requests. Reducing numbers of requests which need medical records to be checked to issue the script. Feedback to staff about the working of the process.</p><p><strong>Strategies for change: </strong>Using a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle for guidance, the team decided to (a) coincide repeat medications and to record on the computer drugs prescribed during visits; (b) give signing of prescriptions a higher priority and bring them to doctors' desks at an agreed time; and (c) move the site for printing prescriptions to the reception desk so as to facilitate face to face queries.</p><p><strong>Effects of change: </strong>Prescription turnaround within 48 hours increased from 95% to 99% with reduced variability case to case and at a reduced cost. The number of prescriptions needing records to be looked at was reduced from 18% to 8.6%. This saved at least one working day of receptionist time each month. Feedback from all staff within the practice indicated greatly increased satisfaction with the newly designed process.</p><p><strong>Lessons learnt: </strong>The team's experience suggests that a combination of audit and improvement methodology offers a powerful way to learn about, and improve, practice. The interventions used by the team not only produced measurable and sustainable improvements but also helped the team to learn about the cost of achieving the results and provided them with tools to accomplish the aims. The importance of feedback to all staff about CQI measures was also recognised.</p>","PeriodicalId":20773,"journal":{"name":"Quality in health care : QHC","volume":"8 2","pages":"119-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qshc.8.2.119","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the repeat prescribing process in a busy general practice. A study using continuous quality improvement methodology.\",\"authors\":\"S Cox,&nbsp;P Wilcock,&nbsp;J Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/qshc.8.2.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>A need to improve service to patients by reducing the time wasted by reception staff so that the 48 hour target for processing repeat prescription requests for patient collection could be achieved.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An interprofessional team was established within the practice to tackle the area of repeat prescribing which had been identified as a priority by practice reception staff. The team met four times in three months and used continuous quality improvement (CQI) methodology (including the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle) with the assistance of an external facilitator.</p><p><strong>Background and setting: </strong>A seven partner practice serving the 14,000 patients on the northern outskirts of Bournemouth including a large council estate and a substantial student population from Bournemouth University. The repeat prescribing process is computerised.</p><p><strong>Key measures for improvement: </strong>Reducing turn around times for repeat prescription requests. Reducing numbers of requests which need medical records to be checked to issue the script. Feedback to staff about the working of the process.</p><p><strong>Strategies for change: </strong>Using a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle for guidance, the team decided to (a) coincide repeat medications and to record on the computer drugs prescribed during visits; (b) give signing of prescriptions a higher priority and bring them to doctors' desks at an agreed time; and (c) move the site for printing prescriptions to the reception desk so as to facilitate face to face queries.</p><p><strong>Effects of change: </strong>Prescription turnaround within 48 hours increased from 95% to 99% with reduced variability case to case and at a reduced cost. The number of prescriptions needing records to be looked at was reduced from 18% to 8.6%. This saved at least one working day of receptionist time each month. Feedback from all staff within the practice indicated greatly increased satisfaction with the newly designed process.</p><p><strong>Lessons learnt: </strong>The team's experience suggests that a combination of audit and improvement methodology offers a powerful way to learn about, and improve, practice. The interventions used by the team not only produced measurable and sustainable improvements but also helped the team to learn about the cost of achieving the results and provided them with tools to accomplish the aims. The importance of feedback to all staff about CQI measures was also recognised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"119-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qshc.8.2.119\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.8.2.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in health care : QHC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.8.2.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

问题:需要通过减少接待人员浪费的时间来改善对患者的服务,以便实现48小时处理重复处方请求以收集患者的目标。设计:在实践中建立了一个跨专业团队来解决重复处方的问题,这已经被实践接待人员确定为优先事项。该团队在三个月内召开了四次会议,并在外部促进者的协助下使用了持续质量改进(CQI)方法(包括计划-执行-研究-行动周期)。背景和环境:伯恩茅斯北郊有7个合作伙伴,为14000名患者提供服务,其中包括一个大型理事会地产和伯恩茅斯大学的大量学生。重复处方过程是计算机化的。改进的关键措施:减少重复处方请求的周转时间。减少需要检查医疗记录以发出脚本的请求数量。向员工反馈流程的工作情况。变革策略:采用计划-执行-研究-行动周期作为指导,研究小组决定(a)重复用药,并在电脑上记录就诊期间开具的药物;(b)把签署处方放在更优先的位置,并在约定的时间将处方送到医生的办公桌;(三)将打印处方的地点移至前台,方便面对面查询。变化的影响:48小时内的处方周转从95%增加到99%,减少了病例之间的差异,降低了成本。需要查看记录的处方数量从18%减少到8.6%。这样每月至少节省了一个工作日的前台接待时间。实践中所有员工的反馈表明,对新设计流程的满意度大大提高。经验教训:团队的经验表明,审计和改进方法的结合提供了学习和改进实践的有力途径。团队使用的干预措施不仅产生了可衡量的和可持续的改进,而且还帮助团队了解了实现结果的成本,并为他们提供了实现目标的工具。向全体员工反馈CQI措施的重要性也得到了认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the repeat prescribing process in a busy general practice. A study using continuous quality improvement methodology.

Problem: A need to improve service to patients by reducing the time wasted by reception staff so that the 48 hour target for processing repeat prescription requests for patient collection could be achieved.

Design: An interprofessional team was established within the practice to tackle the area of repeat prescribing which had been identified as a priority by practice reception staff. The team met four times in three months and used continuous quality improvement (CQI) methodology (including the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle) with the assistance of an external facilitator.

Background and setting: A seven partner practice serving the 14,000 patients on the northern outskirts of Bournemouth including a large council estate and a substantial student population from Bournemouth University. The repeat prescribing process is computerised.

Key measures for improvement: Reducing turn around times for repeat prescription requests. Reducing numbers of requests which need medical records to be checked to issue the script. Feedback to staff about the working of the process.

Strategies for change: Using a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle for guidance, the team decided to (a) coincide repeat medications and to record on the computer drugs prescribed during visits; (b) give signing of prescriptions a higher priority and bring them to doctors' desks at an agreed time; and (c) move the site for printing prescriptions to the reception desk so as to facilitate face to face queries.

Effects of change: Prescription turnaround within 48 hours increased from 95% to 99% with reduced variability case to case and at a reduced cost. The number of prescriptions needing records to be looked at was reduced from 18% to 8.6%. This saved at least one working day of receptionist time each month. Feedback from all staff within the practice indicated greatly increased satisfaction with the newly designed process.

Lessons learnt: The team's experience suggests that a combination of audit and improvement methodology offers a powerful way to learn about, and improve, practice. The interventions used by the team not only produced measurable and sustainable improvements but also helped the team to learn about the cost of achieving the results and provided them with tools to accomplish the aims. The importance of feedback to all staff about CQI measures was also recognised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信