{"title":"隐形眼镜和隐形眼镜消毒液在无症状人群和医务人员中的微生物评价。","authors":"L Közer-Bilgin, N Demir, R Altan-Yaycioglu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the contamination of contact lenses and contact lens disinfection solutions in a population of contact lenses wearers comprised of medical personnel and non-medical subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six medical personnel working in an infectious environment and 35 non-medical subjects were enrolled in the study. Contact lenses and contact lens disinfecting solutions were cultured and potential pathogens were isolated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of isolation of pathogens from the contact lenses of medical personnel was significantly higher than from non-medical subjects. There was no growth in both the contact lens and the disinfecting solution cultures in 56.5% of the subjects in the medical personnel group, and in 57.1% of non-medical group of subjects. Both the contact lens and disinfecting solution cultures were positive in 21.7% of the medical personnel group, while in the non-medical group, only 2.9% of subjects had positive cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microbacterial contamination of contact lenses and disinfection solution was more frequent in the medical personnel group compared with non-medical subjects. In the medical personnel group, the most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus albus (19.8%), which is seen in hospital infections. Because soft and rigid gas permeable contact lens usage was approximately equal, we conclude that medical personnel are more prone to contamination.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"25 4","pages":"228-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological evaluation of contact lenses and contact lens disinfection solutions in an asymptomatic population and in medical personnel.\",\"authors\":\"L Közer-Bilgin, N Demir, R Altan-Yaycioglu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the contamination of contact lenses and contact lens disinfection solutions in a population of contact lenses wearers comprised of medical personnel and non-medical subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six medical personnel working in an infectious environment and 35 non-medical subjects were enrolled in the study. Contact lenses and contact lens disinfecting solutions were cultured and potential pathogens were isolated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of isolation of pathogens from the contact lenses of medical personnel was significantly higher than from non-medical subjects. There was no growth in both the contact lens and the disinfecting solution cultures in 56.5% of the subjects in the medical personnel group, and in 57.1% of non-medical group of subjects. Both the contact lens and disinfecting solution cultures were positive in 21.7% of the medical personnel group, while in the non-medical group, only 2.9% of subjects had positive cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microbacterial contamination of contact lenses and disinfection solution was more frequent in the medical personnel group compared with non-medical subjects. In the medical personnel group, the most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus albus (19.8%), which is seen in hospital infections. Because soft and rigid gas permeable contact lens usage was approximately equal, we conclude that medical personnel are more prone to contamination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"228-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Microbiological evaluation of contact lenses and contact lens disinfection solutions in an asymptomatic population and in medical personnel.
Purpose: To compare the contamination of contact lenses and contact lens disinfection solutions in a population of contact lenses wearers comprised of medical personnel and non-medical subjects.
Methods: Forty-six medical personnel working in an infectious environment and 35 non-medical subjects were enrolled in the study. Contact lenses and contact lens disinfecting solutions were cultured and potential pathogens were isolated.
Results: The frequency of isolation of pathogens from the contact lenses of medical personnel was significantly higher than from non-medical subjects. There was no growth in both the contact lens and the disinfecting solution cultures in 56.5% of the subjects in the medical personnel group, and in 57.1% of non-medical group of subjects. Both the contact lens and disinfecting solution cultures were positive in 21.7% of the medical personnel group, while in the non-medical group, only 2.9% of subjects had positive cultures.
Conclusions: Microbacterial contamination of contact lenses and disinfection solution was more frequent in the medical personnel group compared with non-medical subjects. In the medical personnel group, the most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus albus (19.8%), which is seen in hospital infections. Because soft and rigid gas permeable contact lens usage was approximately equal, we conclude that medical personnel are more prone to contamination.