{"title":"恶意诉讼是如何适应hmo的。","authors":"J B Stern","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In January 1999, in the case of Goodrich v. Aetna, a California jury returned a record-breaking verdict of $120.5 million damages in favor of a widow as a result of Aetna's failure to act in good faith in the treatment of her terminally ill husband. The following article discusses the history and basis of this kind of lawsuit, major decisions specifically pertaining to HMOs, and the outlook for future liability in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":79858,"journal":{"name":"Cost & quality quarterly journal : CQ","volume":"5 2","pages":"19-22, 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How bad faith lawsuits can be tailored to fit HMOs.\",\"authors\":\"J B Stern\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In January 1999, in the case of Goodrich v. Aetna, a California jury returned a record-breaking verdict of $120.5 million damages in favor of a widow as a result of Aetna's failure to act in good faith in the treatment of her terminally ill husband. The following article discusses the history and basis of this kind of lawsuit, major decisions specifically pertaining to HMOs, and the outlook for future liability in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost & quality quarterly journal : CQ\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"19-22, 37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost & quality quarterly journal : CQ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost & quality quarterly journal : CQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
How bad faith lawsuits can be tailored to fit HMOs.
In January 1999, in the case of Goodrich v. Aetna, a California jury returned a record-breaking verdict of $120.5 million damages in favor of a widow as a result of Aetna's failure to act in good faith in the treatment of her terminally ill husband. The following article discusses the history and basis of this kind of lawsuit, major decisions specifically pertaining to HMOs, and the outlook for future liability in this area.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
