M C Norton, J A Tschanz, X Fan, B L Plassman, K A Welsh-Bohmer, N West, B W Wyse, J C Breitner
{"title":"修改后的迷你精神状态测试(3MS)的电话改编。卡什县研究。","authors":"M C Norton, J A Tschanz, X Fan, B L Plassman, K A Welsh-Bohmer, N West, B W Wyse, J C Breitner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the concurrent validity of a newly developed telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Longitudinal studies of cognition may be advantaged by availability of assessment instruments that can be used over the telephone, as well as in person.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Subjects were 263 noninstitutionalized elderly residents of a rural community in southern Idaho, aged 65 to 93, who had little or no cognitive difficulty. At an average interval of four weeks, we administered the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) and the newly adapted Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (T3MS). Order of administration was randomly assigned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement between scores on the two instruments was good (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). When we applied various cutoff scores to the instruments, thereby generating assignments of individuals to \"screen positive\" and \"screen negative\" groups, the percent agreement in screening results ranged from 80% to 96% as we reduced the cutoff scores from 90 to 74 (100 points possible).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At least among subjects without major cognitive syndromes, the Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam provides a reasonable substitute for the more costly in-person 3MS. The telephone instrument should now be tested over a broader range of cognitive abilities in order to assess its validity in more impaired subjects, e.g., by studying an institutionalized sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":79516,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","volume":"12 4","pages":"270-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS). The Cache County Study.\",\"authors\":\"M C Norton, J A Tschanz, X Fan, B L Plassman, K A Welsh-Bohmer, N West, B W Wyse, J C Breitner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the concurrent validity of a newly developed telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Longitudinal studies of cognition may be advantaged by availability of assessment instruments that can be used over the telephone, as well as in person.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Subjects were 263 noninstitutionalized elderly residents of a rural community in southern Idaho, aged 65 to 93, who had little or no cognitive difficulty. At an average interval of four weeks, we administered the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) and the newly adapted Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (T3MS). Order of administration was randomly assigned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement between scores on the two instruments was good (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). When we applied various cutoff scores to the instruments, thereby generating assignments of individuals to \\\"screen positive\\\" and \\\"screen negative\\\" groups, the percent agreement in screening results ranged from 80% to 96% as we reduced the cutoff scores from 90 to 74 (100 points possible).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At least among subjects without major cognitive syndromes, the Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam provides a reasonable substitute for the more costly in-person 3MS. The telephone instrument should now be tested over a broader range of cognitive abilities in order to assess its validity in more impaired subjects, e.g., by studying an institutionalized sample.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"270-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨一种新开发的电话版修正精神状态量表的并发效度。背景:认知的纵向研究可能有利于可用的评估工具,可以通过电话,也可以亲自使用。方法:研究对象为263名来自爱达荷州南部农村社区的老年人,年龄在65至93岁之间,他们很少或没有认知困难。在平均四周的间隔时间内,我们进行了改良的简易精神状态测验(3MS)和新改编的电话改良简易精神状态测验(T3MS)。给药顺序是随机分配的。结果:两种仪器的评分一致性较好(r = 0.82, p < 0.001)。当我们将各种截止分数应用于工具时,从而生成个人分配到“筛选阳性”和“筛选阴性”组,当我们将截止分数从90降低到74(可能为100分)时,筛选结果的一致性百分比从80%到96%不等。结论:至少在没有重大认知综合征的受试者中,电话修正迷你精神状态测试为更昂贵的面对面3MS提供了合理的替代。电话工具现在应该在更广泛的认知能力范围内进行测试,以便评估其在更受损的受试者中的有效性,例如通过研究一个制度化的样本。
Telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS). The Cache County Study.
Objective: To examine the concurrent validity of a newly developed telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam.
Background: Longitudinal studies of cognition may be advantaged by availability of assessment instruments that can be used over the telephone, as well as in person.
Method: Subjects were 263 noninstitutionalized elderly residents of a rural community in southern Idaho, aged 65 to 93, who had little or no cognitive difficulty. At an average interval of four weeks, we administered the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) and the newly adapted Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (T3MS). Order of administration was randomly assigned.
Results: Agreement between scores on the two instruments was good (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). When we applied various cutoff scores to the instruments, thereby generating assignments of individuals to "screen positive" and "screen negative" groups, the percent agreement in screening results ranged from 80% to 96% as we reduced the cutoff scores from 90 to 74 (100 points possible).
Conclusions: At least among subjects without major cognitive syndromes, the Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam provides a reasonable substitute for the more costly in-person 3MS. The telephone instrument should now be tested over a broader range of cognitive abilities in order to assess its validity in more impaired subjects, e.g., by studying an institutionalized sample.