瑞典版巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动性指数。信度和效度。

A Waldner, H Cronstedt, C H Stenström
{"title":"瑞典版巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动性指数。信度和效度。","authors":"A Waldner,&nbsp;H Cronstedt,&nbsp;C H Stenström","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability and the validity of the Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). A total of 113 patients with ankylosing spondylitis were assessed with the BASDAI, the Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G), and a questionnaire on their opinions of the relevance of the BASDAI. The test-retest stability investigation of the BASDAI over 24 hours did not show any difference between the two occasions (md 4.4, range 0.80-8.43 vs md 4.0, range 0-7.80, p > 0.05). The correlation coefficient between the BASDAI and the BASMI was r(s) = 0.07, between the BASDAI and the BASFI r(s) = 0.64, and between the BASDAI and the BAS-G r(s) = 0.80. Eighty percent of the patients considered the contents of the BASDAI to be relevant. The BASDAI, the BAS-G and the BASMI showed significant improvements after an intensive rehabilitation period. In conclusion the results of the present study indicate that the Swedish BASDAI is reliable and valid.</p>","PeriodicalId":21501,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement","volume":"111 ","pages":"10-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Swedish version of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. Reliability and validity.\",\"authors\":\"A Waldner,&nbsp;H Cronstedt,&nbsp;C H Stenström\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability and the validity of the Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). A total of 113 patients with ankylosing spondylitis were assessed with the BASDAI, the Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G), and a questionnaire on their opinions of the relevance of the BASDAI. The test-retest stability investigation of the BASDAI over 24 hours did not show any difference between the two occasions (md 4.4, range 0.80-8.43 vs md 4.0, range 0-7.80, p > 0.05). The correlation coefficient between the BASDAI and the BASMI was r(s) = 0.07, between the BASDAI and the BASFI r(s) = 0.64, and between the BASDAI and the BAS-G r(s) = 0.80. Eighty percent of the patients considered the contents of the BASDAI to be relevant. The BASDAI, the BAS-G and the BASMI showed significant improvements after an intensive rehabilitation period. In conclusion the results of the present study indicate that the Swedish BASDAI is reliable and valid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"10-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是调查瑞典版巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)的可靠性和有效性。共113例强直性脊柱炎患者采用BASDAI、瑞典版的巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)、巴斯强直性脊柱炎计量指数(BASMI)、巴斯强直性脊柱炎患者整体评分(BAS-G)进行评估,并对他们对BASDAI相关性的看法进行问卷调查。BASDAI在24小时内的重测稳定性调查没有显示出两种情况之间的任何差异(md 4.4,范围0.80-8.43 vs md 4.0,范围0-7.80,p > 0.05)。BASDAI与BASMI的相关系数r(s) = 0.07, BASDAI与BASFI的相关系数r(s) = 0.64, BASDAI与BAS-G的相关系数r(s) = 0.80。80%的患者认为BASDAI的内容是相关的。强化康复期后BASDAI、basg和BASMI均有显著改善。总之,本研究的结果表明,瑞典BASDAI是可靠和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Swedish version of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. Reliability and validity.

The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability and the validity of the Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). A total of 113 patients with ankylosing spondylitis were assessed with the BASDAI, the Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G), and a questionnaire on their opinions of the relevance of the BASDAI. The test-retest stability investigation of the BASDAI over 24 hours did not show any difference between the two occasions (md 4.4, range 0.80-8.43 vs md 4.0, range 0-7.80, p > 0.05). The correlation coefficient between the BASDAI and the BASMI was r(s) = 0.07, between the BASDAI and the BASFI r(s) = 0.64, and between the BASDAI and the BAS-G r(s) = 0.80. Eighty percent of the patients considered the contents of the BASDAI to be relevant. The BASDAI, the BAS-G and the BASMI showed significant improvements after an intensive rehabilitation period. In conclusion the results of the present study indicate that the Swedish BASDAI is reliable and valid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信