A López-Alemany, R Montés-Micó, M García-Valldecabres
{"title":"眼生理学与人工泪液。","authors":"A López-Alemany, R Montés-Micó, M García-Valldecabres","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the pH value of nine artificial tears solutions in order to investigate whether their pH changed over time. These solutions are designed to have a pH value within the ocular comfort range and to come close to the physiological tears' pH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen bottles of each solution were randomly chosen from different production lots. Increments of 0.05 ml were taken daily from each bottle and measured daily, using a micropH 2002 Crison pH-meter over a period of 60 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The values obtained fall within the ocular comfort range. Also, we obtained nonstatistically significant variations over time for each solution (p > 0.01). The results revealed differences between solutions, some solutions coming close to the tear's pH and others being slightly more acidic or alkaline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We may assume that all the solutions evaluated will not affect either the ocular physiology or the contact lens wear. The practitioners should know the properties of the solutions, thus selecting the adequate solution for each type of patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":17208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Optometric Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ocular physiology and artificial tears.\",\"authors\":\"A López-Alemany, R Montés-Micó, M García-Valldecabres\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the pH value of nine artificial tears solutions in order to investigate whether their pH changed over time. These solutions are designed to have a pH value within the ocular comfort range and to come close to the physiological tears' pH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen bottles of each solution were randomly chosen from different production lots. Increments of 0.05 ml were taken daily from each bottle and measured daily, using a micropH 2002 Crison pH-meter over a period of 60 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The values obtained fall within the ocular comfort range. Also, we obtained nonstatistically significant variations over time for each solution (p > 0.01). The results revealed differences between solutions, some solutions coming close to the tear's pH and others being slightly more acidic or alkaline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We may assume that all the solutions evaluated will not affect either the ocular physiology or the contact lens wear. The practitioners should know the properties of the solutions, thus selecting the adequate solution for each type of patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Optometric Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Optometric Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Optometric Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: In this study, we evaluated the pH value of nine artificial tears solutions in order to investigate whether their pH changed over time. These solutions are designed to have a pH value within the ocular comfort range and to come close to the physiological tears' pH.
Methods: Fifteen bottles of each solution were randomly chosen from different production lots. Increments of 0.05 ml were taken daily from each bottle and measured daily, using a micropH 2002 Crison pH-meter over a period of 60 days.
Results: The values obtained fall within the ocular comfort range. Also, we obtained nonstatistically significant variations over time for each solution (p > 0.01). The results revealed differences between solutions, some solutions coming close to the tear's pH and others being slightly more acidic or alkaline.
Conclusions: We may assume that all the solutions evaluated will not affect either the ocular physiology or the contact lens wear. The practitioners should know the properties of the solutions, thus selecting the adequate solution for each type of patient.