门诊血管内手术:成本优势及影响其安全性的因素。

L E Shindelman, G B Ninnul, S I Curtiss, S F Konigsberg
{"title":"门诊血管内手术:成本优势及影响其安全性的因素。","authors":"L E Shindelman,&nbsp;G B Ninnul,&nbsp;S I Curtiss,&nbsp;S F Konigsberg","doi":"10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0160:OAAESC>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a retrospective analysis of chronic limb ischemia and determine whether endovascular surgery can be performed safely and cost effectively on an ambulatory basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 42 patients undergoing endovascular interventions for lower limb ischemia over a 12-month period ending October 1997, 32 (18 men, mean age 68 years, range 44 to 89) were treated solely by endovascular interventions. These patients were grouped according to time inhospital: 20 (63%) patients had endovascular procedures performed on an ambulatory basis, 7 (22%) were hospitalized for > 24 hours, and 5 (16%) required an overnight stay. The angioplasty procedures, which included placement of 21 stents, were performed in the abdominal aorta (n = 1) and the common iliac (n = 9), external iliac (n =7), superficial femoral (n = 11), popliteal (n = 5), tibioperoneal (n = 7), and subclavian (n = 1) arteries. Hospital charges were compared for the 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Other than the presence of coronary artery disease, there were no significant differences in demographics or risk factors among the 3 groups. Angioplasty was technically successful in all patients, and there were no procedural complications. Patients with tissue loss required hospitalization more frequently compared to those with claudication. Significantly more patients who were hospitalized had epidural anesthesia as opposed to local when compared to the ambulatory group, 43% versus 5%, respectively (p = 0.04). Excluding professional fees, mean total hospital cost differed significantly between the ambulatory group and the group of patients with a hospital stay > 24 hours ($8227 versus $40,383, respectively; p = 0.03) and between the 2 hospitalized groups ($9476 for overnight stay versus $40,383 for > 24-hour stay, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peripheral endovascular interventions can be performed safely on an ambulatory basis resulting in decreased hospital cost. Patients who receive epidural anesthesia, require concomitant open vascular reconstruction, present with tissue loss, or have unstable medical conditions are more likely to require hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":79443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulatory endovascular surgery: cost advantage and factors influencing its safe performance.\",\"authors\":\"L E Shindelman,&nbsp;G B Ninnul,&nbsp;S I Curtiss,&nbsp;S F Konigsberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0160:OAAESC>2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a retrospective analysis of chronic limb ischemia and determine whether endovascular surgery can be performed safely and cost effectively on an ambulatory basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 42 patients undergoing endovascular interventions for lower limb ischemia over a 12-month period ending October 1997, 32 (18 men, mean age 68 years, range 44 to 89) were treated solely by endovascular interventions. These patients were grouped according to time inhospital: 20 (63%) patients had endovascular procedures performed on an ambulatory basis, 7 (22%) were hospitalized for > 24 hours, and 5 (16%) required an overnight stay. The angioplasty procedures, which included placement of 21 stents, were performed in the abdominal aorta (n = 1) and the common iliac (n = 9), external iliac (n =7), superficial femoral (n = 11), popliteal (n = 5), tibioperoneal (n = 7), and subclavian (n = 1) arteries. Hospital charges were compared for the 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Other than the presence of coronary artery disease, there were no significant differences in demographics or risk factors among the 3 groups. Angioplasty was technically successful in all patients, and there were no procedural complications. Patients with tissue loss required hospitalization more frequently compared to those with claudication. Significantly more patients who were hospitalized had epidural anesthesia as opposed to local when compared to the ambulatory group, 43% versus 5%, respectively (p = 0.04). Excluding professional fees, mean total hospital cost differed significantly between the ambulatory group and the group of patients with a hospital stay > 24 hours ($8227 versus $40,383, respectively; p = 0.03) and between the 2 hospitalized groups ($9476 for overnight stay versus $40,383 for > 24-hour stay, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peripheral endovascular interventions can be performed safely on an ambulatory basis resulting in decreased hospital cost. Patients who receive epidural anesthesia, require concomitant open vascular reconstruction, present with tissue loss, or have unstable medical conditions are more likely to require hospitalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0160:OAAESC>2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0160:OAAESC>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:对慢性肢体缺血进行回顾性分析,以确定是否可以安全、经济、有效地在门诊进行血管内手术。方法:在截至1997年10月的12个月期间,42例下肢缺血患者接受血管内介入治疗,其中32例(男性18例,平均年龄68岁,44 ~ 89岁)单独接受血管内介入治疗。这些患者根据住院时间分组:20名(63%)患者在门诊进行了血管内手术,7名(22%)患者住院时间> 24小时,5名(16%)患者需要住院过夜。血管成形术包括放置21个支架,分别在腹主动脉(n = 1)、髂总动脉(n = 9)、髂外动脉(n =7)、股浅动脉(n = 11)、腘动脉(n = 5)、胫腓动脉(n =7)和锁骨下动脉(n = 1)进行。比较三组患者的住院费用。结果:除有无冠状动脉疾病外,三组患者在人口统计学及危险因素方面均无显著差异。血管成形术在技术上是成功的,没有手术并发症。与跛行患者相比,组织丢失患者需要住院治疗的频率更高。与门诊组相比,住院患者硬膜外麻醉明显多于局部麻醉,分别为43%和5% (p = 0.04)。不包括专业费用,门诊组和住院时间> 24小时的患者组的平均总住院费用差异显著(分别为8227美元和40383美元;P = 0.03),两个住院组之间(过夜住院9476美元,24小时以上住院40383美元,P = 0.03)。结论:外周血管内介入治疗可在门诊安全进行,降低医院费用。接受硬膜外麻醉、需要同时开放血管重建、出现组织丢失或医疗状况不稳定的患者更有可能需要住院治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ambulatory endovascular surgery: cost advantage and factors influencing its safe performance.

Purpose: To perform a retrospective analysis of chronic limb ischemia and determine whether endovascular surgery can be performed safely and cost effectively on an ambulatory basis.

Methods: Among 42 patients undergoing endovascular interventions for lower limb ischemia over a 12-month period ending October 1997, 32 (18 men, mean age 68 years, range 44 to 89) were treated solely by endovascular interventions. These patients were grouped according to time inhospital: 20 (63%) patients had endovascular procedures performed on an ambulatory basis, 7 (22%) were hospitalized for > 24 hours, and 5 (16%) required an overnight stay. The angioplasty procedures, which included placement of 21 stents, were performed in the abdominal aorta (n = 1) and the common iliac (n = 9), external iliac (n =7), superficial femoral (n = 11), popliteal (n = 5), tibioperoneal (n = 7), and subclavian (n = 1) arteries. Hospital charges were compared for the 3 groups.

Results: Other than the presence of coronary artery disease, there were no significant differences in demographics or risk factors among the 3 groups. Angioplasty was technically successful in all patients, and there were no procedural complications. Patients with tissue loss required hospitalization more frequently compared to those with claudication. Significantly more patients who were hospitalized had epidural anesthesia as opposed to local when compared to the ambulatory group, 43% versus 5%, respectively (p = 0.04). Excluding professional fees, mean total hospital cost differed significantly between the ambulatory group and the group of patients with a hospital stay > 24 hours ($8227 versus $40,383, respectively; p = 0.03) and between the 2 hospitalized groups ($9476 for overnight stay versus $40,383 for > 24-hour stay, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Peripheral endovascular interventions can be performed safely on an ambulatory basis resulting in decreased hospital cost. Patients who receive epidural anesthesia, require concomitant open vascular reconstruction, present with tissue loss, or have unstable medical conditions are more likely to require hospitalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信