[喉罩在急救中的价值——对北德急诊医师的调查]。

Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation Pub Date : 1999-01-01
K Jaeger, A Osthaus, M André, H Ruschulte, J Heine, D Scheinichen, M Leuwer
{"title":"[喉罩在急救中的价值——对北德急诊医师的调查]。","authors":"K Jaeger,&nbsp;A Osthaus,&nbsp;M André,&nbsp;H Ruschulte,&nbsp;J Heine,&nbsp;D Scheinichen,&nbsp;M Leuwer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical routine, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has proved an alternative to both endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation. In a survey among North German emergency physicians, aspects such as doctors' acquaintance with the LMA, the degree of ist distribution, its use and its potential benefits under non-hospital emergency conditions were evaluated. Seventeen per cent (n = 162) of physicians responded to the questionnaire, 75% of them (n = 122) anaesthetists. Although 73% (n = 119) were familiar with the use of the LMA from clinical experience, and again 73% would welcome having LMA use and application as part of the training of non-academic members of ambulance teams, only 24% (n = 37) of the responding doctors have an LMA on their emergency ambulances and merely twelve (7.4%) physicians reported actually using the LMA, one of them unsuccessfully. Sixty-three per cent considered the LMA the first-choice alternative in an unexpected \"can't-ventilate-can't-intubate\" situation. Use of the LMA should be extended in emergency medicine especially as its application is relatively easy to learn in clinical routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":76993,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","volume":"24 3","pages":"79-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Value of the laryngeal mask in emergency care--a survey of North German emergency physicians].\",\"authors\":\"K Jaeger,&nbsp;A Osthaus,&nbsp;M André,&nbsp;H Ruschulte,&nbsp;J Heine,&nbsp;D Scheinichen,&nbsp;M Leuwer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In clinical routine, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has proved an alternative to both endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation. In a survey among North German emergency physicians, aspects such as doctors' acquaintance with the LMA, the degree of ist distribution, its use and its potential benefits under non-hospital emergency conditions were evaluated. Seventeen per cent (n = 162) of physicians responded to the questionnaire, 75% of them (n = 122) anaesthetists. Although 73% (n = 119) were familiar with the use of the LMA from clinical experience, and again 73% would welcome having LMA use and application as part of the training of non-academic members of ambulance teams, only 24% (n = 37) of the responding doctors have an LMA on their emergency ambulances and merely twelve (7.4%) physicians reported actually using the LMA, one of them unsuccessfully. Sixty-three per cent considered the LMA the first-choice alternative in an unexpected \\\"can't-ventilate-can't-intubate\\\" situation. Use of the LMA should be extended in emergency medicine especially as its application is relatively easy to learn in clinical routine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"79-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床常规中,喉罩气道(LMA)已被证明是一种替代气管插管和面罩通气的方法。在一项针对北德急诊医生的调查中,对医生对LMA的了解程度、分布程度、在非医院急诊条件下的使用和潜在益处等方面进行了评估。17% (n = 162)的医生回答了问卷,其中75% (n = 122)是麻醉师。尽管73% (n = 119)的医生从临床经验中熟悉LMA的使用,73%的医生欢迎将LMA的使用和应用作为救护车团队非学术成员培训的一部分,但只有24% (n = 37)的受访医生在他们的紧急救护车上使用了LMA,只有12名(7.4%)医生报告实际使用了LMA,其中一人不成功。63%的人认为LMA是在意外的“不能通气-不能插管”情况下的首选选择。由于LMA在临床常规中相对容易学习,因此应在急诊医学中推广使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Value of the laryngeal mask in emergency care--a survey of North German emergency physicians].

In clinical routine, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has proved an alternative to both endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation. In a survey among North German emergency physicians, aspects such as doctors' acquaintance with the LMA, the degree of ist distribution, its use and its potential benefits under non-hospital emergency conditions were evaluated. Seventeen per cent (n = 162) of physicians responded to the questionnaire, 75% of them (n = 122) anaesthetists. Although 73% (n = 119) were familiar with the use of the LMA from clinical experience, and again 73% would welcome having LMA use and application as part of the training of non-academic members of ambulance teams, only 24% (n = 37) of the responding doctors have an LMA on their emergency ambulances and merely twelve (7.4%) physicians reported actually using the LMA, one of them unsuccessfully. Sixty-three per cent considered the LMA the first-choice alternative in an unexpected "can't-ventilate-can't-intubate" situation. Use of the LMA should be extended in emergency medicine especially as its application is relatively easy to learn in clinical routine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信