循证实践及其在低危妇女分娩护理中的应用。

Journal of nurse-midwifery Pub Date : 1999-07-01
J P Rooks
{"title":"循证实践及其在低危妇女分娩护理中的应用。","authors":"J P Rooks","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Evidence-based medicine\" has been hailed as the \"new paradigm\" for health care. This paper defines evidence-based practice, describes its development and growing importance, explains why randomized controlled trials are the \"gold standard\" for evidence about the effectiveness of specific therapeutic methods, warns about reaching conclusions based on any single study, and points the reader towards good sources of information on how to assess the relevance of findings from published studies and systematic reviews of the most reliable evidence regarding particular components of the care of pregnant women. As a result of those reviews, specific elements of perinatal care have been classified into categories based on their usefulness or harmfulness when applied to low-risk women. The paper goes on to summarize the evidence regarding three intrapartum practices that are demonstrably safe and useful and \"should be encouraged\" and four intrapartum practices that have trade-offs between beneficial and adverse effects and are \"frequently used inappropriately.\" Some of the most beneficial elements of intrapartum care are not available to most women who give birth in American hospitals, and some practices that are useful but have adverse effects are being provided to an ever-expanding proportion of women.</p>","PeriodicalId":16670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nurse-midwifery","volume":"44 4","pages":"355-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based practice and its application to childbirth care for low-risk women.\",\"authors\":\"J P Rooks\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\\"Evidence-based medicine\\\" has been hailed as the \\\"new paradigm\\\" for health care. This paper defines evidence-based practice, describes its development and growing importance, explains why randomized controlled trials are the \\\"gold standard\\\" for evidence about the effectiveness of specific therapeutic methods, warns about reaching conclusions based on any single study, and points the reader towards good sources of information on how to assess the relevance of findings from published studies and systematic reviews of the most reliable evidence regarding particular components of the care of pregnant women. As a result of those reviews, specific elements of perinatal care have been classified into categories based on their usefulness or harmfulness when applied to low-risk women. The paper goes on to summarize the evidence regarding three intrapartum practices that are demonstrably safe and useful and \\\"should be encouraged\\\" and four intrapartum practices that have trade-offs between beneficial and adverse effects and are \\\"frequently used inappropriately.\\\" Some of the most beneficial elements of intrapartum care are not available to most women who give birth in American hospitals, and some practices that are useful but have adverse effects are being provided to an ever-expanding proportion of women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nurse-midwifery\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"355-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nurse-midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nurse-midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“循证医学”被誉为卫生保健的“新范式”。本文定义了循证实践,描述了它的发展和日益增长的重要性,解释了为什么随机对照试验是证明特定治疗方法有效性的“黄金标准”,警告不要根据任何单一研究得出结论,并向读者指出如何评估已发表的研究结果的相关性以及对有关孕妇护理的特定组成部分的最可靠证据的系统评价的良好信息来源。这些审查的结果是,围产期护理的具体内容已根据其对低风险妇女的有用性或危害性分类。这篇论文接着总结了关于三种明显安全、有用、“应该鼓励”的分娩时做法的证据,以及四种在有益和不利影响之间权衡利弊、“经常使用不当”的分娩时做法的证据。大多数在美国医院分娩的妇女无法获得产时护理的一些最有益的因素,而一些有用但有不利影响的做法正在向越来越多的妇女提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence-based practice and its application to childbirth care for low-risk women.

"Evidence-based medicine" has been hailed as the "new paradigm" for health care. This paper defines evidence-based practice, describes its development and growing importance, explains why randomized controlled trials are the "gold standard" for evidence about the effectiveness of specific therapeutic methods, warns about reaching conclusions based on any single study, and points the reader towards good sources of information on how to assess the relevance of findings from published studies and systematic reviews of the most reliable evidence regarding particular components of the care of pregnant women. As a result of those reviews, specific elements of perinatal care have been classified into categories based on their usefulness or harmfulness when applied to low-risk women. The paper goes on to summarize the evidence regarding three intrapartum practices that are demonstrably safe and useful and "should be encouraged" and four intrapartum practices that have trade-offs between beneficial and adverse effects and are "frequently used inappropriately." Some of the most beneficial elements of intrapartum care are not available to most women who give birth in American hospitals, and some practices that are useful but have adverse effects are being provided to an ever-expanding proportion of women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信