Q Huang, E D Cox, T Gan, C Ma, D W Bennett, R M McKernan, J M Cook
{"title":"GABAA/苯二氮卓受体亚型的分子药效团/受体模型研究:通过比较分子场分析取代β -碳卡啉在重组α x β 3 γ 2亚型上的结合亲和力和定量构效关系研究。","authors":"Q Huang, E D Cox, T Gan, C Ma, D W Bennett, R M McKernan, J M Cook","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Binding affinities of a series of 44 beta-carbolines with various substituents at the 3-, 4-, 6- and 7-positions are reported at 5 distinct recombinant GABAA/benzodiazepine receptor (BzR) subtypes [alpha x beta 3 gamma 2 (x = 1-3, 5, 6)]. Many of these ligands displayed better selectivity for the alpha 1 containing GABAA isoform. The most selective BCCT 2 and SPH 195 (17) displayed potent affinity (Ki = 0.72 and 7.2 nM for the alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2 receptor subtype, respectively) and an overall selectivity of 20 and 23 fold, respectively, for the alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2 receptor subtype. These are the most selective ligands in vitro for the alpha 1 containing GABAA/Bz receptor isoform reported to date to our knowledge. QSAR studies of these ligands for each receptor subtype have been carried out via a Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) and an included volume analysis. Geometries and charge distributions of these ligands have been optimized using ab initio methods (J. Med. Chem., 1992, 35, 4001-4010). Active conformations of flexible 3-alkoxylated beta-carbolines have been examined via a CoMFA approach. QSAR studies via CoMFA support the previous hypothesis that beta-carbolines with different intrinsic activities may follow an alternative alignment rule when they bind into the pharmacophore/receptor site of the BzR. Examination of binding affinities of beta-carbolines by this modeling strategy has established some of the differences, in particular, topologic differences between the lipophilic pockets in the alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2, alpha 2 beta 3 gamma 2, alpha 3 beta 3 gamma 2, alpha 5 beta 3 gamma 2 and alpha 6 beta 3 gamma 2 subtypes as well as some of the similarities among the pharmacophore/receptor models of these five distinct GABAA/Bz receptor subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11297,"journal":{"name":"Drug design and discovery","volume":"16 1","pages":"55-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studies of molecular pharmacophore/receptor models for GABAA/benzodiazepine receptor subtypes: binding affinities of substituted beta-carbolines at recombinant alpha x beta 3 gamma 2 subtypes and quantitative structure-activity relationship studies via a comparative molecular field analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Q Huang, E D Cox, T Gan, C Ma, D W Bennett, R M McKernan, J M Cook\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Binding affinities of a series of 44 beta-carbolines with various substituents at the 3-, 4-, 6- and 7-positions are reported at 5 distinct recombinant GABAA/benzodiazepine receptor (BzR) subtypes [alpha x beta 3 gamma 2 (x = 1-3, 5, 6)]. Many of these ligands displayed better selectivity for the alpha 1 containing GABAA isoform. The most selective BCCT 2 and SPH 195 (17) displayed potent affinity (Ki = 0.72 and 7.2 nM for the alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2 receptor subtype, respectively) and an overall selectivity of 20 and 23 fold, respectively, for the alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2 receptor subtype. These are the most selective ligands in vitro for the alpha 1 containing GABAA/Bz receptor isoform reported to date to our knowledge. QSAR studies of these ligands for each receptor subtype have been carried out via a Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) and an included volume analysis. Geometries and charge distributions of these ligands have been optimized using ab initio methods (J. Med. Chem., 1992, 35, 4001-4010). Active conformations of flexible 3-alkoxylated beta-carbolines have been examined via a CoMFA approach. QSAR studies via CoMFA support the previous hypothesis that beta-carbolines with different intrinsic activities may follow an alternative alignment rule when they bind into the pharmacophore/receptor site of the BzR. Examination of binding affinities of beta-carbolines by this modeling strategy has established some of the differences, in particular, topologic differences between the lipophilic pockets in the alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2, alpha 2 beta 3 gamma 2, alpha 3 beta 3 gamma 2, alpha 5 beta 3 gamma 2 and alpha 6 beta 3 gamma 2 subtypes as well as some of the similarities among the pharmacophore/receptor models of these five distinct GABAA/Bz receptor subtypes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug design and discovery\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"55-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug design and discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug design and discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Studies of molecular pharmacophore/receptor models for GABAA/benzodiazepine receptor subtypes: binding affinities of substituted beta-carbolines at recombinant alpha x beta 3 gamma 2 subtypes and quantitative structure-activity relationship studies via a comparative molecular field analysis.
Binding affinities of a series of 44 beta-carbolines with various substituents at the 3-, 4-, 6- and 7-positions are reported at 5 distinct recombinant GABAA/benzodiazepine receptor (BzR) subtypes [alpha x beta 3 gamma 2 (x = 1-3, 5, 6)]. Many of these ligands displayed better selectivity for the alpha 1 containing GABAA isoform. The most selective BCCT 2 and SPH 195 (17) displayed potent affinity (Ki = 0.72 and 7.2 nM for the alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2 receptor subtype, respectively) and an overall selectivity of 20 and 23 fold, respectively, for the alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2 receptor subtype. These are the most selective ligands in vitro for the alpha 1 containing GABAA/Bz receptor isoform reported to date to our knowledge. QSAR studies of these ligands for each receptor subtype have been carried out via a Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) and an included volume analysis. Geometries and charge distributions of these ligands have been optimized using ab initio methods (J. Med. Chem., 1992, 35, 4001-4010). Active conformations of flexible 3-alkoxylated beta-carbolines have been examined via a CoMFA approach. QSAR studies via CoMFA support the previous hypothesis that beta-carbolines with different intrinsic activities may follow an alternative alignment rule when they bind into the pharmacophore/receptor site of the BzR. Examination of binding affinities of beta-carbolines by this modeling strategy has established some of the differences, in particular, topologic differences between the lipophilic pockets in the alpha 1 beta 3 gamma 2, alpha 2 beta 3 gamma 2, alpha 3 beta 3 gamma 2, alpha 5 beta 3 gamma 2 and alpha 6 beta 3 gamma 2 subtypes as well as some of the similarities among the pharmacophore/receptor models of these five distinct GABAA/Bz receptor subtypes.