有多少胰岛素样生长因子- i (IGF-I)在循环?标准化对igf - 1测定准确性的影响。

V Quarmby, C Quan
{"title":"有多少胰岛素样生长因子- i (IGF-I)在循环?标准化对igf - 1测定准确性的影响。","authors":"V Quarmby,&nbsp;C Quan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I, somatomedin-C) is a peptide hormone which plays an important role in growth regulation. Accurate measurements of circulating IGF-I levels in plasma samples are an important part of many studies on growth and development, and therefore many assays have been developed for this purpose. We have found that assay standardization has a major impact on IGF-I quantification. Most IGF-I assays are calibrated against the World Health Organization (WHO) International Reference Reagent (IRR) for IGF-I Immunoassays (87/518). The protein content assigned to WHO IRR 87/518 was a consensus value from a multicentre WHO collaborative study. Here we present physico-chemical data showing that WHO IRR 87/518 is Met(-1) IGF-I of low purity (44%), and that the assigned protein content is somewhat higher than the <<true>> value determined by quantitative amino acid analysis. We show that assays calibrated against WHO IRR 87/518 report total IGF-I concentrations that are in excess of actual values by approximately two-fold. For this reason much of the IGF-I concentration data in the literature, which are based on assays calibrated against WHO IRR 87/518, are of questionable accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11308,"journal":{"name":"Developments in biological standardization","volume":"97 ","pages":"111-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How much insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) circulates?: impact of standardization on IGF-I assay accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"V Quarmby,&nbsp;C Quan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I, somatomedin-C) is a peptide hormone which plays an important role in growth regulation. Accurate measurements of circulating IGF-I levels in plasma samples are an important part of many studies on growth and development, and therefore many assays have been developed for this purpose. We have found that assay standardization has a major impact on IGF-I quantification. Most IGF-I assays are calibrated against the World Health Organization (WHO) International Reference Reagent (IRR) for IGF-I Immunoassays (87/518). The protein content assigned to WHO IRR 87/518 was a consensus value from a multicentre WHO collaborative study. Here we present physico-chemical data showing that WHO IRR 87/518 is Met(-1) IGF-I of low purity (44%), and that the assigned protein content is somewhat higher than the <<true>> value determined by quantitative amino acid analysis. We show that assays calibrated against WHO IRR 87/518 report total IGF-I concentrations that are in excess of actual values by approximately two-fold. For this reason much of the IGF-I concentration data in the literature, which are based on assays calibrated against WHO IRR 87/518, are of questionable accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developments in biological standardization\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"111-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developments in biological standardization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胰岛素样生长因子- i (IGF-I, somatomedin-C)是一种在生长调节中起重要作用的肽激素。血浆样本中循环igf - 1水平的准确测量是许多生长发育研究的重要组成部分,因此为此目的开发了许多分析方法。我们发现,检测标准化对igf - 1的定量有重大影响。大多数igf - 1测定是根据世界卫生组织(WHO) igf - 1免疫测定的国际参考试剂(IRR)进行校准的(87/518)。分配给世卫组织IRR 87/518的蛋白质含量是世卫组织多中心合作研究的共识值。在这里,我们提供的物理化学数据显示WHO IRR 87/518是低纯度(44%)的Met(-1) IGF-I,并且指定的蛋白质含量略高于定量氨基酸分析确定的>值。我们表明,根据WHO IRR 87/518校准的测定报告的IGF-I总浓度超过实际值约两倍。因此,文献中许多基于WHO IRR 87/518校准的测定的igf - 1浓度数据的准确性值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How much insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) circulates?: impact of standardization on IGF-I assay accuracy.

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I, somatomedin-C) is a peptide hormone which plays an important role in growth regulation. Accurate measurements of circulating IGF-I levels in plasma samples are an important part of many studies on growth and development, and therefore many assays have been developed for this purpose. We have found that assay standardization has a major impact on IGF-I quantification. Most IGF-I assays are calibrated against the World Health Organization (WHO) International Reference Reagent (IRR) for IGF-I Immunoassays (87/518). The protein content assigned to WHO IRR 87/518 was a consensus value from a multicentre WHO collaborative study. Here we present physico-chemical data showing that WHO IRR 87/518 is Met(-1) IGF-I of low purity (44%), and that the assigned protein content is somewhat higher than the <> value determined by quantitative amino acid analysis. We show that assays calibrated against WHO IRR 87/518 report total IGF-I concentrations that are in excess of actual values by approximately two-fold. For this reason much of the IGF-I concentration data in the literature, which are based on assays calibrated against WHO IRR 87/518, are of questionable accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信