便携式凝血酶原时间测定仪Coaguchek与三种口服抗凝治疗控制系统的比较研究。

Haemostasis Pub Date : 1998-11-01 DOI:10.1159/000022449
M Vacas, P J Lafuente, S Cuesta, J A Iriarte
{"title":"便携式凝血酶原时间测定仪Coaguchek与三种口服抗凝治疗控制系统的比较研究。","authors":"M Vacas,&nbsp;P J Lafuente,&nbsp;S Cuesta,&nbsp;J A Iriarte","doi":"10.1159/000022449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-testing of oral anticoagulation is a new possibility related to the development of portable capillary whole blood prothrombin time monitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate one of this monitors, Coaguchek, with respect to its comparability with our routine prothrombin time determination system, as well as with the reference manual technique and two thromboplastins of high sensitivity, Manchester Reagent and one manufactured in our center, Thromboplastin Bilbao, in a group of patients on oral anticoagulant treatment. Although a correlation of r = 0.9271 was found between international normalized ratio (INR) values of Coaguchek and our routine method, Neoplastine/STA analyzer, the difference of the INR scatter increased with the magnitude of measurement, being lowest for INR between the portable monitor and Manchester Reagent and Thromboplastin Bilbao, with a similar coefficient of correlation, r = 0.8948 and r = 0.8905, respectively. A test was performed showing a 65.6% agreement with the INR values of the STA analyzer, 66.4% with Manchester Reagent and 73.4% with Thromboplastin Bilbao. On the basis of this correspondence with laboratory prothrombin time results Coaguchek may be considered as a possible option for monitoring anticoagulated patients even though patients should be given instructions and advice as regards the management and interpretation of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12910,"journal":{"name":"Haemostasis","volume":"28 6","pages":"321-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000022449","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of a portable monitor for prothrombin time determination, Coaguchek, with three systems for control of oral anticoagulant treatment.\",\"authors\":\"M Vacas,&nbsp;P J Lafuente,&nbsp;S Cuesta,&nbsp;J A Iriarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000022449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Self-testing of oral anticoagulation is a new possibility related to the development of portable capillary whole blood prothrombin time monitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate one of this monitors, Coaguchek, with respect to its comparability with our routine prothrombin time determination system, as well as with the reference manual technique and two thromboplastins of high sensitivity, Manchester Reagent and one manufactured in our center, Thromboplastin Bilbao, in a group of patients on oral anticoagulant treatment. Although a correlation of r = 0.9271 was found between international normalized ratio (INR) values of Coaguchek and our routine method, Neoplastine/STA analyzer, the difference of the INR scatter increased with the magnitude of measurement, being lowest for INR between the portable monitor and Manchester Reagent and Thromboplastin Bilbao, with a similar coefficient of correlation, r = 0.8948 and r = 0.8905, respectively. A test was performed showing a 65.6% agreement with the INR values of the STA analyzer, 66.4% with Manchester Reagent and 73.4% with Thromboplastin Bilbao. On the basis of this correspondence with laboratory prothrombin time results Coaguchek may be considered as a possible option for monitoring anticoagulated patients even though patients should be given instructions and advice as regards the management and interpretation of the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"321-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000022449\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000022449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000022449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

口服抗凝自检是便携式毛细管全血凝血酶原时间监测仪发展的一种新的可能性。本研究的目的是评估其中一种监测仪Coaguchek与我们常规凝血酶原时间测定系统的可比性,以及与参考手册技术和两种高灵敏度凝血酶(Manchester Reagent)和我们中心生产的凝血酶(Thromboplastin Bilbao)在口服抗凝治疗患者中的可比性。Coaguchek的国际标准化比值(INR)值与我们的常规方法Neoplastine/STA分析仪之间的相关性为r = 0.9271,但INR散射值的差异随着测量量的增加而增加,便携式监护仪与曼彻斯特试剂和凝血活素毕尔巴鄂之间的INR最低,相关系数相似,分别为r = 0.8948和r = 0.8905。结果表明,STA分析仪的INR值与STA分析仪的INR值的一致性为65.6%,与曼彻斯特试剂的INR值的一致性为66.4%,与凝血活蛋白毕尔巴鄂的INR值的一致性为73.4%。基于与实验室凝血酶原时间结果的一致性,Coaguchek可以被认为是监测抗凝患者的一种可能选择,尽管患者应该得到有关结果管理和解释的指导和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of a portable monitor for prothrombin time determination, Coaguchek, with three systems for control of oral anticoagulant treatment.

Self-testing of oral anticoagulation is a new possibility related to the development of portable capillary whole blood prothrombin time monitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate one of this monitors, Coaguchek, with respect to its comparability with our routine prothrombin time determination system, as well as with the reference manual technique and two thromboplastins of high sensitivity, Manchester Reagent and one manufactured in our center, Thromboplastin Bilbao, in a group of patients on oral anticoagulant treatment. Although a correlation of r = 0.9271 was found between international normalized ratio (INR) values of Coaguchek and our routine method, Neoplastine/STA analyzer, the difference of the INR scatter increased with the magnitude of measurement, being lowest for INR between the portable monitor and Manchester Reagent and Thromboplastin Bilbao, with a similar coefficient of correlation, r = 0.8948 and r = 0.8905, respectively. A test was performed showing a 65.6% agreement with the INR values of the STA analyzer, 66.4% with Manchester Reagent and 73.4% with Thromboplastin Bilbao. On the basis of this correspondence with laboratory prothrombin time results Coaguchek may be considered as a possible option for monitoring anticoagulated patients even though patients should be given instructions and advice as regards the management and interpretation of the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信