三维超声心动图计算左室流出道面积。对主动脉瓣狭窄量化的影响。

T Menzel, S Mohr-Kahaly, S Wagner, T Fischer, A Brückner, J Meyer
{"title":"三维超声心动图计算左室流出道面积。对主动脉瓣狭窄量化的影响。","authors":"T Menzel,&nbsp;S Mohr-Kahaly,&nbsp;S Wagner,&nbsp;T Fischer,&nbsp;A Brückner,&nbsp;J Meyer","doi":"10.1023/a:1006045303442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 23 patients with aortic valve stenosis (14 male, 9 female, mean age 66 +/- 21.5 years) left ventricular outflow tract cross-sectional area was determined in planimetric fashion using three-dimensional echocardiography. The 3-D data-set for each patient had been acquired in the course of a multiplane transesophageal examination. Aortic valve area was determined using the continuity equation. Results obtained were compared to those calculated by continuity equation using to the conventionally determined LVOT area (a = pi [d/2]2). As reference method the results were compared to invasive measurements. 3-D planimetric determination of LVOT cross-sectional area was possible in 20 of 23 patients. In three patients, this method failed due to artefacts. The mean difference to the conventionally calculated LVOT area amounted to 0.18 cm2 (SD = 0.46). The comparison of AVA determined by continuity equation and by invasive measurement showed a mean difference of -0.074 cm2 (SD = 0.21) for the conventionally calculated LVOT area; for the planimetrically determined LVOT area the mean difference of AVA amounted to -0.03 cm2 (SD = 0.14) (p < 0.05). Planimetric determination of LVOT area using 3-D echocardiography improves the agreement of the continuity equation with invasive measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":77179,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiac imaging","volume":"14 6","pages":"373-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006045303442","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculation of left ventricular outflow tract area using three-dimensional echocardiography. Influence on quantification of aortic valve stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"T Menzel,&nbsp;S Mohr-Kahaly,&nbsp;S Wagner,&nbsp;T Fischer,&nbsp;A Brückner,&nbsp;J Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1006045303442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 23 patients with aortic valve stenosis (14 male, 9 female, mean age 66 +/- 21.5 years) left ventricular outflow tract cross-sectional area was determined in planimetric fashion using three-dimensional echocardiography. The 3-D data-set for each patient had been acquired in the course of a multiplane transesophageal examination. Aortic valve area was determined using the continuity equation. Results obtained were compared to those calculated by continuity equation using to the conventionally determined LVOT area (a = pi [d/2]2). As reference method the results were compared to invasive measurements. 3-D planimetric determination of LVOT cross-sectional area was possible in 20 of 23 patients. In three patients, this method failed due to artefacts. The mean difference to the conventionally calculated LVOT area amounted to 0.18 cm2 (SD = 0.46). The comparison of AVA determined by continuity equation and by invasive measurement showed a mean difference of -0.074 cm2 (SD = 0.21) for the conventionally calculated LVOT area; for the planimetrically determined LVOT area the mean difference of AVA amounted to -0.03 cm2 (SD = 0.14) (p < 0.05). Planimetric determination of LVOT area using 3-D echocardiography improves the agreement of the continuity equation with invasive measurement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiac imaging\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"373-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006045303442\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiac imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006045303442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiac imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006045303442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

对23例主动脉瓣狭窄患者(男14例,女9例,平均年龄66±21.5岁)采用三维超声心动图平面法测定左室流出道横截面积。每位患者的三维数据集是在多平面经食管检查过程中获得的。采用连续性方程确定主动脉瓣面积。将得到的结果与使用常规确定的LVOT面积(a = pi [d/2]2)的连续性方程计算结果进行比较。作为参考方法,将结果与有创测量结果进行比较。23例患者中有20例可以三维平面测量LVOT横截面积。在3例患者中,该方法因假影而失败。与常规计算的LVOT面积的平均差异为0.18 cm2 (SD = 0.46)。连续性方程计算的AVA与有创测量的AVA比较,常规计算的LVOT面积平均差值为-0.074 cm2 (SD = 0.21);对于平面测量的LVOT面积,AVA的平均差异为-0.03 cm2 (SD = 0.14) (p < 0.05)。利用三维超声心动图平面确定左心室面积,提高了连续性方程与有创测量的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calculation of left ventricular outflow tract area using three-dimensional echocardiography. Influence on quantification of aortic valve stenosis.

In 23 patients with aortic valve stenosis (14 male, 9 female, mean age 66 +/- 21.5 years) left ventricular outflow tract cross-sectional area was determined in planimetric fashion using three-dimensional echocardiography. The 3-D data-set for each patient had been acquired in the course of a multiplane transesophageal examination. Aortic valve area was determined using the continuity equation. Results obtained were compared to those calculated by continuity equation using to the conventionally determined LVOT area (a = pi [d/2]2). As reference method the results were compared to invasive measurements. 3-D planimetric determination of LVOT cross-sectional area was possible in 20 of 23 patients. In three patients, this method failed due to artefacts. The mean difference to the conventionally calculated LVOT area amounted to 0.18 cm2 (SD = 0.46). The comparison of AVA determined by continuity equation and by invasive measurement showed a mean difference of -0.074 cm2 (SD = 0.21) for the conventionally calculated LVOT area; for the planimetrically determined LVOT area the mean difference of AVA amounted to -0.03 cm2 (SD = 0.14) (p < 0.05). Planimetric determination of LVOT area using 3-D echocardiography improves the agreement of the continuity equation with invasive measurement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信