诊断,客观评估严重程度,和管理急性胰腺炎。圣托里尼共识会议。

C Dervenis, C D Johnson, C Bassi, E Bradley, C W Imrie, M J McMahon, I Modlin
{"title":"诊断,客观评估严重程度,和管理急性胰腺炎。圣托里尼共识会议。","authors":"C Dervenis,&nbsp;C D Johnson,&nbsp;C Bassi,&nbsp;E Bradley,&nbsp;C W Imrie,&nbsp;M J McMahon,&nbsp;I Modlin","doi":"10.1007/BF02925968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis, early assessment, and management of severe acute pancreatitis remain difficult clinical problems. This article presents the consensus obtained at a meeting convened to consider the evidence in these areas. The aim of the article is to provide outcome statements to guide clinical practice, with an assessment of the supporting evidence for each statement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Working groups considered the published evidence in the areas of diagnosis, assessment of severity, nonoperative treatment, and surgical treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Outcome statements were defined to summarize the conclusions on each point considered. The findings were discussed and agreed on by all participants. A careful assessment was made of the strength of the available evidence (proven, probable, possible, unproven, or inappropriate).</p><p><strong>Findings and conclusions: </strong>There is reliable evidence to support much current practice. Clear guidance can be given in most areas examined, and several areas were identified where further investigation would be helpful. Diagnosis using plasma concentrations of pancreatic enzymes is reliable. Rapid advances are taking place in the assessment of severity. Several new therapeutic strategies show real promise for the reduction of morbidity and mortality rates. Surgical debridement is required for infected pancreatic necrosis, but is less often necessary for sterile necrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73464,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02925968","citationCount":"174","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini consensus conference.\",\"authors\":\"C Dervenis,&nbsp;C D Johnson,&nbsp;C Bassi,&nbsp;E Bradley,&nbsp;C W Imrie,&nbsp;M J McMahon,&nbsp;I Modlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02925968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis, early assessment, and management of severe acute pancreatitis remain difficult clinical problems. This article presents the consensus obtained at a meeting convened to consider the evidence in these areas. The aim of the article is to provide outcome statements to guide clinical practice, with an assessment of the supporting evidence for each statement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Working groups considered the published evidence in the areas of diagnosis, assessment of severity, nonoperative treatment, and surgical treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Outcome statements were defined to summarize the conclusions on each point considered. The findings were discussed and agreed on by all participants. A careful assessment was made of the strength of the available evidence (proven, probable, possible, unproven, or inappropriate).</p><p><strong>Findings and conclusions: </strong>There is reliable evidence to support much current practice. Clear guidance can be given in most areas examined, and several areas were identified where further investigation would be helpful. Diagnosis using plasma concentrations of pancreatic enzymes is reliable. Rapid advances are taking place in the assessment of severity. Several new therapeutic strategies show real promise for the reduction of morbidity and mortality rates. Surgical debridement is required for infected pancreatic necrosis, but is less often necessary for sterile necrosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02925968\",\"citationCount\":\"174\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02925968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 174

摘要

背景:重症急性胰腺炎的诊断、早期评估和治疗仍然是临床难题。本文介绍了在一次会议上获得的共识,该会议是为了考虑这些领域的证据而召开的。本文的目的是提供指导临床实践的结果陈述,并对每个陈述的支持证据进行评估。方法:工作组考虑了在重症急性胰腺炎的诊断、严重程度评估、非手术治疗和手术治疗领域发表的证据。结果陈述被定义为总结所考虑的每一点的结论。所有参与者都讨论并同意了调查结果。对现有证据的强度(已证实的、可能的、可能的、未证实的或不适当的)进行了仔细的评估。发现和结论:有可靠的证据支持目前的许多做法。在审查的大多数领域可以提供明确的指导,并确定了几个领域,其中进一步调查将有所帮助。使用血浆胰酶浓度诊断是可靠的。在评估严重程度方面正在取得迅速进展。一些新的治疗策略显示出降低发病率和死亡率的真正希望。对于感染性胰腺坏死需要手术清创,但对于无菌性坏死则不太需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini consensus conference.

Background: The diagnosis, early assessment, and management of severe acute pancreatitis remain difficult clinical problems. This article presents the consensus obtained at a meeting convened to consider the evidence in these areas. The aim of the article is to provide outcome statements to guide clinical practice, with an assessment of the supporting evidence for each statement.

Method: Working groups considered the published evidence in the areas of diagnosis, assessment of severity, nonoperative treatment, and surgical treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Outcome statements were defined to summarize the conclusions on each point considered. The findings were discussed and agreed on by all participants. A careful assessment was made of the strength of the available evidence (proven, probable, possible, unproven, or inappropriate).

Findings and conclusions: There is reliable evidence to support much current practice. Clear guidance can be given in most areas examined, and several areas were identified where further investigation would be helpful. Diagnosis using plasma concentrations of pancreatic enzymes is reliable. Rapid advances are taking place in the assessment of severity. Several new therapeutic strategies show real promise for the reduction of morbidity and mortality rates. Surgical debridement is required for infected pancreatic necrosis, but is less often necessary for sterile necrosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信