D F Sweeney, M D Willcox, N Sansey, C Leitch, N Harmis, R Wong, B A Holden
{"title":"正常使用中保存的生理盐水溶液的污染发生率。","authors":"D F Sweeney, M D Willcox, N Sansey, C Leitch, N Harmis, R Wong, B A Holden","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To ascertain the incidence of microbial contamination of preserved contact lens saline solutions with normal patient use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight different brands of preserved saline were dispensed to 40 patients attending optometric practices in the Sydney area. After specific periods of time (7 to 28 days), the samples were collected and the solution bottle nozzles and contents underwent microbial analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall contamination rate was approximately 26% for contents only and 55% for nozzles of preserved saline solutions. This rate remained constant for all periods of use. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were most frequently isolated. No Acanthamoebae were isolated. Saline preserved with ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in conjunction with sorbic acid showed the highest percentage of sterility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study show that preserved saline became contaminated with gram-positive bacteria. This is in contrast to our previously published paper using unpreserved saline, where contamination was predominantly with gram-negative bacteria. The overall contamination rates with preserved saline were lower than for unpreserved saline.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"25 3","pages":"167-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of contamination of preserved saline solutions during normal use.\",\"authors\":\"D F Sweeney, M D Willcox, N Sansey, C Leitch, N Harmis, R Wong, B A Holden\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To ascertain the incidence of microbial contamination of preserved contact lens saline solutions with normal patient use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight different brands of preserved saline were dispensed to 40 patients attending optometric practices in the Sydney area. After specific periods of time (7 to 28 days), the samples were collected and the solution bottle nozzles and contents underwent microbial analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall contamination rate was approximately 26% for contents only and 55% for nozzles of preserved saline solutions. This rate remained constant for all periods of use. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were most frequently isolated. No Acanthamoebae were isolated. Saline preserved with ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in conjunction with sorbic acid showed the highest percentage of sterility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study show that preserved saline became contaminated with gram-positive bacteria. This is in contrast to our previously published paper using unpreserved saline, where contamination was predominantly with gram-negative bacteria. The overall contamination rates with preserved saline were lower than for unpreserved saline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"167-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incidence of contamination of preserved saline solutions during normal use.
Purpose: To ascertain the incidence of microbial contamination of preserved contact lens saline solutions with normal patient use.
Methods: Eight different brands of preserved saline were dispensed to 40 patients attending optometric practices in the Sydney area. After specific periods of time (7 to 28 days), the samples were collected and the solution bottle nozzles and contents underwent microbial analysis.
Results: The overall contamination rate was approximately 26% for contents only and 55% for nozzles of preserved saline solutions. This rate remained constant for all periods of use. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were most frequently isolated. No Acanthamoebae were isolated. Saline preserved with ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in conjunction with sorbic acid showed the highest percentage of sterility.
Conclusions: The results of this study show that preserved saline became contaminated with gram-positive bacteria. This is in contrast to our previously published paper using unpreserved saline, where contamination was predominantly with gram-negative bacteria. The overall contamination rates with preserved saline were lower than for unpreserved saline.