胸部战伤。

Acta chirurgica Hungarica Pub Date : 1999-01-01
N Ilić, A Petricević, S Tanfara, Z Mimica, V Radonić, A Tripković, N Frleta Ilić
{"title":"胸部战伤。","authors":"N Ilić,&nbsp;A Petricević,&nbsp;S Tanfara,&nbsp;Z Mimica,&nbsp;V Radonić,&nbsp;A Tripković,&nbsp;N Frleta Ilić","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Presentation of our experiences in the treatment of war injuries to the chest at the Split University Hospital, Croatia, during the 1991-1995 war in Croatia and Bosnia-Hercegovina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of clinical and surgical data on 439 (16.3%) patients with war injuries to the chest among 2693 treated battle casualties in general. The medical data from evacuation unit, transportation, emergency department and follow-up were observed and processed by basic statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were more explosive wounds than gunshot and puncture wounds (ratio 251/158/30). Penetrating injuries were found in 348 (79%) patients and nonpenetrating in 91 (21%) patients. There were 401 (91%) men and 38 (9%) women. Thoracotomy was performed in 98 (22.3%) patients, whereas conservative surgical methods (wound treatment, chest-tube drainage, appropriate fluid therapy, antimicrobial and atelectasis prophylaxis) were used in 341 (77.7%) patients. Mean time elapsed between injury and definitive surgical repair was seven hours (range, 1 to 48 hours). Recovery on discharge was recorded in 411 (93.6%) patients, 19 (4.3%) patients were referred to other institution for further treatment, and 9 (2%) severely wounded persons died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment of respiratory insufficiency and haemorrhage shock, and prevention of infection are the basis of management of these injuries. Prompt transportation, appropriate diagnostic methods and an adequate surgical treatment can markedly reduce mortality and complications rate in war injuries to the chest. Most war wound of the lung can be successfully managed by \"conservative\" surgical treatment. The recovery of lung function was similar in conservatively and operatively treated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":76967,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Hungarica","volume":"38 1","pages":"43-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"War injuries to the chest.\",\"authors\":\"N Ilić,&nbsp;A Petricević,&nbsp;S Tanfara,&nbsp;Z Mimica,&nbsp;V Radonić,&nbsp;A Tripković,&nbsp;N Frleta Ilić\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Presentation of our experiences in the treatment of war injuries to the chest at the Split University Hospital, Croatia, during the 1991-1995 war in Croatia and Bosnia-Hercegovina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of clinical and surgical data on 439 (16.3%) patients with war injuries to the chest among 2693 treated battle casualties in general. The medical data from evacuation unit, transportation, emergency department and follow-up were observed and processed by basic statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were more explosive wounds than gunshot and puncture wounds (ratio 251/158/30). Penetrating injuries were found in 348 (79%) patients and nonpenetrating in 91 (21%) patients. There were 401 (91%) men and 38 (9%) women. Thoracotomy was performed in 98 (22.3%) patients, whereas conservative surgical methods (wound treatment, chest-tube drainage, appropriate fluid therapy, antimicrobial and atelectasis prophylaxis) were used in 341 (77.7%) patients. Mean time elapsed between injury and definitive surgical repair was seven hours (range, 1 to 48 hours). Recovery on discharge was recorded in 411 (93.6%) patients, 19 (4.3%) patients were referred to other institution for further treatment, and 9 (2%) severely wounded persons died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The treatment of respiratory insufficiency and haemorrhage shock, and prevention of infection are the basis of management of these injuries. Prompt transportation, appropriate diagnostic methods and an adequate surgical treatment can markedly reduce mortality and complications rate in war injuries to the chest. Most war wound of the lung can be successfully managed by \\\"conservative\\\" surgical treatment. The recovery of lung function was similar in conservatively and operatively treated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta chirurgica Hungarica\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"43-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta chirurgica Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:介绍1991-1995年克罗地亚和波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那战争期间我们在克罗地亚斯普利特大学医院治疗胸部战伤的经验。方法:回顾性分析2693例普通战斗伤亡者中439例(16.3%)胸部战伤患者的临床及手术资料。对后送单位、运输单位、急诊科和随访的医疗数据进行观察和基本统计分析处理。结果:爆炸伤多于枪击和穿刺伤(比例为251/158/30)。穿透性损伤348例(79%),非穿透性损伤91例(21%)。其中男性401人(91%),女性38人(9%)。98例(22.3%)患者行开胸手术,341例(77.7%)患者采用保守手术方法(伤口处理、胸管引流、适当的液体治疗、抗菌药物和预防肺不张)。从损伤到最终手术修复的平均时间为7小时(范围为1至48小时)。出院后康复411例(93.6%),转院治疗19例(4.3%),重伤死亡9例(2%)。结论:呼吸功能不全和失血性休克的治疗和预防感染是治疗的基础。及时运送、适当的诊断方法和适当的外科治疗可显著降低胸部战伤的死亡率和并发症发生率。大多数肺部战伤可以通过“保守”手术治疗成功。保守治疗与手术治疗患者肺功能恢复相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
War injuries to the chest.

Aim: Presentation of our experiences in the treatment of war injuries to the chest at the Split University Hospital, Croatia, during the 1991-1995 war in Croatia and Bosnia-Hercegovina.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical and surgical data on 439 (16.3%) patients with war injuries to the chest among 2693 treated battle casualties in general. The medical data from evacuation unit, transportation, emergency department and follow-up were observed and processed by basic statistical analysis.

Results: There were more explosive wounds than gunshot and puncture wounds (ratio 251/158/30). Penetrating injuries were found in 348 (79%) patients and nonpenetrating in 91 (21%) patients. There were 401 (91%) men and 38 (9%) women. Thoracotomy was performed in 98 (22.3%) patients, whereas conservative surgical methods (wound treatment, chest-tube drainage, appropriate fluid therapy, antimicrobial and atelectasis prophylaxis) were used in 341 (77.7%) patients. Mean time elapsed between injury and definitive surgical repair was seven hours (range, 1 to 48 hours). Recovery on discharge was recorded in 411 (93.6%) patients, 19 (4.3%) patients were referred to other institution for further treatment, and 9 (2%) severely wounded persons died.

Conclusions: The treatment of respiratory insufficiency and haemorrhage shock, and prevention of infection are the basis of management of these injuries. Prompt transportation, appropriate diagnostic methods and an adequate surgical treatment can markedly reduce mortality and complications rate in war injuries to the chest. Most war wound of the lung can be successfully managed by "conservative" surgical treatment. The recovery of lung function was similar in conservatively and operatively treated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信