MLL基因探针对微量残留病中期和间期FISH监测的比较:以t型AML为例(9;11)。

Annales de genetique Pub Date : 1999-01-01
J H Gallo, L G Robson, N W Watson, P Sharma, A Smith
{"title":"MLL基因探针对微量残留病中期和间期FISH监测的比较:以t型AML为例(9;11)。","authors":"J H Gallo,&nbsp;L G Robson,&nbsp;N W Watson,&nbsp;P Sharma,&nbsp;A Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The place of FISH in the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) is yet to be fully characterised. Routine bone marrow cytogenetics at diagnosis in a 22 year old patient with acute myeloid leukemia FAB type M5 detected a translocation t(9;11)(p22;q23). We report our investigations to assess residual levels of translocation using a FISH probe designed to detect a gene split by the translocation. We used MLL (Oncor), a probe which spans the MLL gene at 11q23, in both metaphase and interphase preparations. At diagnosis, metaphase FISH showed 3 distinct cell lines-normal with 2 signals, abnormal with 3 signals and abnormal with 2 signals, while interphase FISH showed only 2 cell lines, one with 2 signals (which could be normal or abnormal) and one with 3 signals (split MLL). Following treatment, with the patient in clinical remission, 7 further cytogenetic analyses and 2 further FISH analyses were compared. Our results suggest that monitoring of the t(9;11) by metaphase FISH is feasible and straightforward compared to cytogenetics but interphase FISH may be problematic.</p>","PeriodicalId":7908,"journal":{"name":"Annales de genetique","volume":"42 2","pages":"109-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of metaphase and interphase FISH monitoring of minimal residual disease with MLL gene probe: case study of AML with t(9;11).\",\"authors\":\"J H Gallo,&nbsp;L G Robson,&nbsp;N W Watson,&nbsp;P Sharma,&nbsp;A Smith\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The place of FISH in the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) is yet to be fully characterised. Routine bone marrow cytogenetics at diagnosis in a 22 year old patient with acute myeloid leukemia FAB type M5 detected a translocation t(9;11)(p22;q23). We report our investigations to assess residual levels of translocation using a FISH probe designed to detect a gene split by the translocation. We used MLL (Oncor), a probe which spans the MLL gene at 11q23, in both metaphase and interphase preparations. At diagnosis, metaphase FISH showed 3 distinct cell lines-normal with 2 signals, abnormal with 3 signals and abnormal with 2 signals, while interphase FISH showed only 2 cell lines, one with 2 signals (which could be normal or abnormal) and one with 3 signals (split MLL). Following treatment, with the patient in clinical remission, 7 further cytogenetic analyses and 2 further FISH analyses were compared. Our results suggest that monitoring of the t(9;11) by metaphase FISH is feasible and straightforward compared to cytogenetics but interphase FISH may be problematic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de genetique\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"109-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de genetique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de genetique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

FISH在微小残留病(MRD)监测中的地位尚未得到充分表征。22岁急性髓系白血病FAB型M5患者诊断时常规骨髓细胞遗传学检测到t易位(9;11)(p22;q23)。我们报告了我们的调查,以评估剩余水平的易位使用FISH探针设计检测基因分裂的易位。我们在中期和间期制备中使用了横跨MLL基因11q23的探针MLL (Oncor)。诊断时,中期FISH显示3个不同的细胞系,正常带2个信号、异常带3个信号、异常带2个信号,而间期FISH仅显示2个细胞系,1个带2个信号(正常或异常),1个带3个信号(分裂MLL)。治疗后,患者临床缓解,7个进一步的细胞遗传学分析和2个进一步的FISH分析进行比较。我们的研究结果表明,与细胞遗传学相比,中期FISH监测t(9;11)是可行且直接的,但间期FISH可能存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of metaphase and interphase FISH monitoring of minimal residual disease with MLL gene probe: case study of AML with t(9;11).

The place of FISH in the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) is yet to be fully characterised. Routine bone marrow cytogenetics at diagnosis in a 22 year old patient with acute myeloid leukemia FAB type M5 detected a translocation t(9;11)(p22;q23). We report our investigations to assess residual levels of translocation using a FISH probe designed to detect a gene split by the translocation. We used MLL (Oncor), a probe which spans the MLL gene at 11q23, in both metaphase and interphase preparations. At diagnosis, metaphase FISH showed 3 distinct cell lines-normal with 2 signals, abnormal with 3 signals and abnormal with 2 signals, while interphase FISH showed only 2 cell lines, one with 2 signals (which could be normal or abnormal) and one with 3 signals (split MLL). Following treatment, with the patient in clinical remission, 7 further cytogenetic analyses and 2 further FISH analyses were compared. Our results suggest that monitoring of the t(9;11) by metaphase FISH is feasible and straightforward compared to cytogenetics but interphase FISH may be problematic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信