采用中窝入路改善人工耳蜗患者听觉表现。

V Colletti, F G Fiorino, L Saccetto, N Giarbini, M Carner
{"title":"采用中窝入路改善人工耳蜗患者听觉表现。","authors":"V Colletti,&nbsp;F G Fiorino,&nbsp;L Saccetto,&nbsp;N Giarbini,&nbsp;M Carner","doi":"10.3109/00206099909073026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The preliminary results of insertion of a cochlear implant via the middle fossa in nine patients with profound bilateral hearing loss are described. Aetiologies included a bilateral radical mastoidectomy cavity, adhesive otitis media, autoimmune inner ear disease, previous cranial trauma, genetic pre-lingual deafness, and otosclerosis. A classic middle fossa approach was adopted. A small cochleostomy measuring 1.5 mm in diameter was performed on the most superficial part of the basal turn. A Nucleus 24M cochlear implant system (Cochlear Corporation) was inserted in four patients, a Lauraflex implant (Philips Hearing Implants) was used in three patients and a Combi 40+ (Med-el) with a double electrode array in two. Single electrode arrays were inserted from the cochleostomy to the cochlear apex and occupied a portion of the basal turn, as well as the middle and apical turns. Double electrode arrays were inserted, one towards the apex and one into the basal turn of the cochlea towards the round window. The receiver stimulator was positioned in a bone well previously drilled in the temporal squama and the electrode carrier was inserted in the fenestrated cochlea. The activity of the inserted electrodes was tested by means of telemetry and intraoperative recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR). Speech recognition tests, performed over a period of time ranging from one to six months after cochlear implant activation, yielded better results in these patients compared with those obtained in postlingually deaf patients operated on via the traditional transmastoid route. Cochlear implant insertion via the middle fossa approach is a technique which is suitable for the implantation of patients with bilateral radical mastoidectomy cavities, chronic middle ear disease, middle ear malformations, or with partial obliteration of the cochlea in the basal turn. However, the main advantage of inserting the implant through the middle fossa cochleostomy consists in the possibility of stimulating, with the single array, areas of the cochlea, i.e. part of the basal, middle and apical turns, where a greater survival rate of spiral ganglion cells is known to occur. In addition, with the double array total occupation of the cochlea is possible, providing the possibility of replicating the tonotopic organization of the cochlea. This new approach has led to major improvements in speech recognition in all patients compared with patients operated on via the transmastoid approach and, given the present state of the art, may be the elective approach for optimal implantation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"38 4","pages":"225-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206099909073026","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved auditory performance of cochlear implant patients using the middle fossa approach.\",\"authors\":\"V Colletti,&nbsp;F G Fiorino,&nbsp;L Saccetto,&nbsp;N Giarbini,&nbsp;M Carner\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/00206099909073026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The preliminary results of insertion of a cochlear implant via the middle fossa in nine patients with profound bilateral hearing loss are described. Aetiologies included a bilateral radical mastoidectomy cavity, adhesive otitis media, autoimmune inner ear disease, previous cranial trauma, genetic pre-lingual deafness, and otosclerosis. A classic middle fossa approach was adopted. A small cochleostomy measuring 1.5 mm in diameter was performed on the most superficial part of the basal turn. A Nucleus 24M cochlear implant system (Cochlear Corporation) was inserted in four patients, a Lauraflex implant (Philips Hearing Implants) was used in three patients and a Combi 40+ (Med-el) with a double electrode array in two. Single electrode arrays were inserted from the cochleostomy to the cochlear apex and occupied a portion of the basal turn, as well as the middle and apical turns. Double electrode arrays were inserted, one towards the apex and one into the basal turn of the cochlea towards the round window. The receiver stimulator was positioned in a bone well previously drilled in the temporal squama and the electrode carrier was inserted in the fenestrated cochlea. The activity of the inserted electrodes was tested by means of telemetry and intraoperative recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR). Speech recognition tests, performed over a period of time ranging from one to six months after cochlear implant activation, yielded better results in these patients compared with those obtained in postlingually deaf patients operated on via the traditional transmastoid route. Cochlear implant insertion via the middle fossa approach is a technique which is suitable for the implantation of patients with bilateral radical mastoidectomy cavities, chronic middle ear disease, middle ear malformations, or with partial obliteration of the cochlea in the basal turn. However, the main advantage of inserting the implant through the middle fossa cochleostomy consists in the possibility of stimulating, with the single array, areas of the cochlea, i.e. part of the basal, middle and apical turns, where a greater survival rate of spiral ganglion cells is known to occur. In addition, with the double array total occupation of the cochlea is possible, providing the possibility of replicating the tonotopic organization of the cochlea. This new approach has led to major improvements in speech recognition in all patients compared with patients operated on via the transmastoid approach and, given the present state of the art, may be the elective approach for optimal implantation outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"225-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206099909073026\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099909073026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099909073026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

本文描述了9例重度双侧听力损失患者经中窝植入人工耳蜗的初步结果。病因包括双侧根治性乳突切除术腔、粘连性中耳炎、自身免疫性内耳疾病、既往颅脑创伤、遗传性语前耳聋和耳硬化。采用经典的中窝入路。在基底匝最浅层处行直径1.5 mm的小耳蜗造口术。4例患者使用Nucleus 24M人工耳蜗系统(cochlear Corporation), 3例患者使用Lauraflex人工耳蜗(Philips Hearing implant), 2例患者使用Combi 40+双电极阵列人工耳蜗(Med-el)。从耳蜗造口至耳蜗尖处置入单电极阵列,占据部分耳蜗基圈、中圈和耳蜗尖圈。双电极阵列插入,一个指向耳蜗顶点,一个指向耳蜗基侧圆窗。接收器刺激器放置在颞骨鳞片上钻孔的骨孔中,电极载体插入有孔耳蜗。通过遥测和术中记录电诱发听觉脑干反应(EABR)来检测插入电极的活动。在人工耳蜗激活后一至六个月的时间内进行的语音识别测试,与通过传统的经乳突途径进行手术的语后聋患者相比,在这些患者中取得了更好的结果。中窝入路人工耳蜗植入术是一种适用于双侧乳突根治性切除空腔、慢性中耳疾病、中耳畸形或基底转部分耳蜗闭塞患者的植入术。然而,通过中窝耳蜗造口置入人工耳蜗的主要优势在于,可以用单一阵列刺激耳蜗的部分区域,即部分基底、中间和根尖弯,已知螺旋神经节细胞在这些区域存活率更高。此外,双阵列完全占据耳蜗是可能的,提供了复制耳蜗同种异位组织的可能性。与经乳突肌入路手术的患者相比,这种新入路在所有患者的语音识别方面都有了重大改善,鉴于目前的技术水平,这种新入路可能是获得最佳植入结果的首选入路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved auditory performance of cochlear implant patients using the middle fossa approach.

The preliminary results of insertion of a cochlear implant via the middle fossa in nine patients with profound bilateral hearing loss are described. Aetiologies included a bilateral radical mastoidectomy cavity, adhesive otitis media, autoimmune inner ear disease, previous cranial trauma, genetic pre-lingual deafness, and otosclerosis. A classic middle fossa approach was adopted. A small cochleostomy measuring 1.5 mm in diameter was performed on the most superficial part of the basal turn. A Nucleus 24M cochlear implant system (Cochlear Corporation) was inserted in four patients, a Lauraflex implant (Philips Hearing Implants) was used in three patients and a Combi 40+ (Med-el) with a double electrode array in two. Single electrode arrays were inserted from the cochleostomy to the cochlear apex and occupied a portion of the basal turn, as well as the middle and apical turns. Double electrode arrays were inserted, one towards the apex and one into the basal turn of the cochlea towards the round window. The receiver stimulator was positioned in a bone well previously drilled in the temporal squama and the electrode carrier was inserted in the fenestrated cochlea. The activity of the inserted electrodes was tested by means of telemetry and intraoperative recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR). Speech recognition tests, performed over a period of time ranging from one to six months after cochlear implant activation, yielded better results in these patients compared with those obtained in postlingually deaf patients operated on via the traditional transmastoid route. Cochlear implant insertion via the middle fossa approach is a technique which is suitable for the implantation of patients with bilateral radical mastoidectomy cavities, chronic middle ear disease, middle ear malformations, or with partial obliteration of the cochlea in the basal turn. However, the main advantage of inserting the implant through the middle fossa cochleostomy consists in the possibility of stimulating, with the single array, areas of the cochlea, i.e. part of the basal, middle and apical turns, where a greater survival rate of spiral ganglion cells is known to occur. In addition, with the double array total occupation of the cochlea is possible, providing the possibility of replicating the tonotopic organization of the cochlea. This new approach has led to major improvements in speech recognition in all patients compared with patients operated on via the transmastoid approach and, given the present state of the art, may be the elective approach for optimal implantation outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信