静脉血栓栓塞的二级预防:低分子肝素的作用。

Haemostasis Pub Date : 1998-09-01 DOI:10.1159/000022437
M Monreal, F J Roncales, J Ruiz, J Muchart, M Fraile, J Costa, J A Hernandez
{"title":"静脉血栓栓塞的二级预防:低分子肝素的作用。","authors":"M Monreal,&nbsp;F J Roncales,&nbsp;J Ruiz,&nbsp;J Muchart,&nbsp;M Fraile,&nbsp;J Costa,&nbsp;J A Hernandez","doi":"10.1159/000022437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After a short initial course of heparin therapy, patients with venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) require continuing anticoagulant therapy for several months after hospital discharge. At present, two small-scale studies have compared the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) with warfarin in the secondary prevention of VTE.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We studied 654 consecutive patients, 202 with pulmonary embolism (PE) and 452 patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs. 220/654 patients (34%) were considered to have some contraindications to coumarin, and were discharged on LMWH (dalteparin, Fragmin((R)), 10, 000 IU s.c. once daily). The remaining 434/654 patients were asked to choose between either coumarin or LMWH: 190 patients preferred LMWH and 244 coumarin. Patients were followed up for a 3-month (DVT patients) or 6-month (PE patients) period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14/654 patients (2%) developed recurrent VTE while on anticoagulant therapy. One in every three recurrent episodes was PE (which was fatal in 2/5 patients), and half of the recurrent DVT were located in the contralateral leg. We failed to find any differences between patients receiving LMWH and those on coumarin therapy, but recurrences were more common in patients with cancer (hazard ratio: 17.15; 95% CI: 4.0-73.5; p < 0.001). 21 patients (3.3%) bled (major bleeding 5 patients; minor bleeding 16). Bleeding was more common in patients on coumarin therapy (hazard ratio: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.20-8.22; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term LMWH therapy proved to be both effective and safe in the long-term treatment of VTE. Thus, we suggest long-term LMWH therapy should be considered for patients with contraindications to coumarin, or those with difficulties in coming to laboratory control.</p>","PeriodicalId":12910,"journal":{"name":"Haemostasis","volume":"28 5","pages":"236-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000022437","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: A role for low-molecular-weight heparin.\",\"authors\":\"M Monreal,&nbsp;F J Roncales,&nbsp;J Ruiz,&nbsp;J Muchart,&nbsp;M Fraile,&nbsp;J Costa,&nbsp;J A Hernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000022437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After a short initial course of heparin therapy, patients with venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) require continuing anticoagulant therapy for several months after hospital discharge. At present, two small-scale studies have compared the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) with warfarin in the secondary prevention of VTE.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We studied 654 consecutive patients, 202 with pulmonary embolism (PE) and 452 patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs. 220/654 patients (34%) were considered to have some contraindications to coumarin, and were discharged on LMWH (dalteparin, Fragmin((R)), 10, 000 IU s.c. once daily). The remaining 434/654 patients were asked to choose between either coumarin or LMWH: 190 patients preferred LMWH and 244 coumarin. Patients were followed up for a 3-month (DVT patients) or 6-month (PE patients) period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14/654 patients (2%) developed recurrent VTE while on anticoagulant therapy. One in every three recurrent episodes was PE (which was fatal in 2/5 patients), and half of the recurrent DVT were located in the contralateral leg. We failed to find any differences between patients receiving LMWH and those on coumarin therapy, but recurrences were more common in patients with cancer (hazard ratio: 17.15; 95% CI: 4.0-73.5; p < 0.001). 21 patients (3.3%) bled (major bleeding 5 patients; minor bleeding 16). Bleeding was more common in patients on coumarin therapy (hazard ratio: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.20-8.22; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term LMWH therapy proved to be both effective and safe in the long-term treatment of VTE. Thus, we suggest long-term LMWH therapy should be considered for patients with contraindications to coumarin, or those with difficulties in coming to laboratory control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"236-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000022437\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000022437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000022437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)患者在接受肝素短期初始治疗后,出院后需要持续数月的抗凝治疗。目前有两项小规模研究比较了低分子肝素(LMWH)与华法林在静脉血栓栓塞二级预防中的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:我们研究了654例连续患者,202例肺栓塞(PE)和452例下肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。220/654例患者(34%)被认为有香豆素禁忌症,出院时使用低分子肝素(dalteparin, Fragmin(R), 10000 IU s.c.每日1次)。其余434/654名患者被要求在香豆素或低分子肝素之间做出选择:190名患者选择低分子肝素,244名患者选择香豆素。患者随访3个月(DVT患者)或6个月(PE患者)。结果:654例患者中有14例(2%)在抗凝治疗期间发生静脉血栓栓塞复发。每3次复发中就有1次是PE(2/5的患者死亡),一半的复发DVT位于对侧腿。我们没有发现接受低分子肝素治疗的患者与接受香豆素治疗的患者之间有任何差异,但癌症患者的复发更为常见(风险比:17.15;95% ci: 4.0-73.5;P < 0.001)。出血21例(3.3%)(大出血5例;小出血。使用香豆素治疗的患者出血更常见(风险比:3.14;95% ci: 1.20-8.22;P = 0.02)。结论:长期应用低分子肝素治疗静脉血栓栓塞是安全有效的。因此,我们建议对于有香豆素禁忌症或难以进入实验室控制的患者应考虑长期低分子肝素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: A role for low-molecular-weight heparin.

Background: After a short initial course of heparin therapy, patients with venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) require continuing anticoagulant therapy for several months after hospital discharge. At present, two small-scale studies have compared the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) with warfarin in the secondary prevention of VTE.

Patients and methods: We studied 654 consecutive patients, 202 with pulmonary embolism (PE) and 452 patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs. 220/654 patients (34%) were considered to have some contraindications to coumarin, and were discharged on LMWH (dalteparin, Fragmin((R)), 10, 000 IU s.c. once daily). The remaining 434/654 patients were asked to choose between either coumarin or LMWH: 190 patients preferred LMWH and 244 coumarin. Patients were followed up for a 3-month (DVT patients) or 6-month (PE patients) period.

Results: 14/654 patients (2%) developed recurrent VTE while on anticoagulant therapy. One in every three recurrent episodes was PE (which was fatal in 2/5 patients), and half of the recurrent DVT were located in the contralateral leg. We failed to find any differences between patients receiving LMWH and those on coumarin therapy, but recurrences were more common in patients with cancer (hazard ratio: 17.15; 95% CI: 4.0-73.5; p < 0.001). 21 patients (3.3%) bled (major bleeding 5 patients; minor bleeding 16). Bleeding was more common in patients on coumarin therapy (hazard ratio: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.20-8.22; p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Long-term LMWH therapy proved to be both effective and safe in the long-term treatment of VTE. Thus, we suggest long-term LMWH therapy should be considered for patients with contraindications to coumarin, or those with difficulties in coming to laboratory control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信