非肝硬化肝炎患者吲哚菁绿清除率试验:常规采血法与指片监测法的比较分析。

Changgeng yi xue za zhi Pub Date : 1999-03-01
M Y Su, D Y Lin, I S Sheen, C M Chu, C T Chiu, Y F Liaw
{"title":"非肝硬化肝炎患者吲哚菁绿清除率试验:常规采血法与指片监测法的比较分析。","authors":"M Y Su,&nbsp;D Y Lin,&nbsp;I S Sheen,&nbsp;C M Chu,&nbsp;C T Chiu,&nbsp;Y F Liaw","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The indocyanine green (ICG) Finger Piece Monitor system is a non-invasive method for measuring blood ICG concentrations for the evaluation of hepatic function. This study was conducted to determine its clinical usefulness in non-cirrhotic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Traditional liver function tests, alpha-fetoprotein, prothrombin time, and ICG clearance tests, by both blood sampling method and Finger Piece Monitoring method were performed simultaneously on 56 non-cirrhotic hepatitis patients. The plasma clearance rate (K) and 15-minute retention ratio (R15) of ICG were analyzed and compared with traditional liver function test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clearance rate using the Finger Piece Monitoring method was slightly lower than that of the blood sampling method (9.16 +/- 5.00%/min vs. 11.24 +/- 3.56%/min) with good correlation (r = 0.721, p = 0.0003). The 15-minute retention ratio using the Finger Piece Monitoring method showed better correlation with blood sampling method (32.83 +/- 23.99% vs. 28.49 +/- 23.74%, r = 0.944, p = 0.0002). Analysis between traditional laboratory tests and fR15 revealed a higher fR15 value in patients with bilirubin-total-T > or = 3 mg/dl (49.71 +/- 26.22% vs. 22.23 +/- 13.48%), alpha-fetoprotein > or = 100 ng/ml (61.96 +/- 15.84% vs. 28.52 +/- 21.74%), and PT prolongation > or = 3 sec (71.46 +/- 16.80% vs. 29.03 +/- 21.06%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a good correlation between the conventional blood sampling method and the ICG Finger Piece Monitoring system method. The ICG Finger Monitoring system provides an alternative for traditional laboratory tests for the evaluation of hepatic dysfunction in hepatitis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77066,"journal":{"name":"Changgeng yi xue za zhi","volume":"22 1","pages":"17-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indocyanine green clearance test in non-cirrhotic hepatitis patients: a comparison and analysis between conventional blood sampling method and Finger Piece Monitoring method.\",\"authors\":\"M Y Su,&nbsp;D Y Lin,&nbsp;I S Sheen,&nbsp;C M Chu,&nbsp;C T Chiu,&nbsp;Y F Liaw\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The indocyanine green (ICG) Finger Piece Monitor system is a non-invasive method for measuring blood ICG concentrations for the evaluation of hepatic function. This study was conducted to determine its clinical usefulness in non-cirrhotic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Traditional liver function tests, alpha-fetoprotein, prothrombin time, and ICG clearance tests, by both blood sampling method and Finger Piece Monitoring method were performed simultaneously on 56 non-cirrhotic hepatitis patients. The plasma clearance rate (K) and 15-minute retention ratio (R15) of ICG were analyzed and compared with traditional liver function test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clearance rate using the Finger Piece Monitoring method was slightly lower than that of the blood sampling method (9.16 +/- 5.00%/min vs. 11.24 +/- 3.56%/min) with good correlation (r = 0.721, p = 0.0003). The 15-minute retention ratio using the Finger Piece Monitoring method showed better correlation with blood sampling method (32.83 +/- 23.99% vs. 28.49 +/- 23.74%, r = 0.944, p = 0.0002). Analysis between traditional laboratory tests and fR15 revealed a higher fR15 value in patients with bilirubin-total-T > or = 3 mg/dl (49.71 +/- 26.22% vs. 22.23 +/- 13.48%), alpha-fetoprotein > or = 100 ng/ml (61.96 +/- 15.84% vs. 28.52 +/- 21.74%), and PT prolongation > or = 3 sec (71.46 +/- 16.80% vs. 29.03 +/- 21.06%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a good correlation between the conventional blood sampling method and the ICG Finger Piece Monitoring system method. The ICG Finger Monitoring system provides an alternative for traditional laboratory tests for the evaluation of hepatic dysfunction in hepatitis patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Changgeng yi xue za zhi\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"17-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Changgeng yi xue za zhi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changgeng yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吲哚菁绿(ICG)指片监测系统是一种无创测量血液中ICG浓度的方法,用于评估肝功能。本研究旨在确定其在非肝硬化患者中的临床应用。方法:对56例非肝硬化肝炎患者同时进行传统肝功能、甲胎蛋白、凝血酶原时间、ICG清除率检测,采用采血法和指片监测法。分析ICG的血浆清除率(K)和15分钟滞留率(R15),并与传统肝功能检查结果进行比较。结果:指片监测法清除率略低于采血法(9.16 +/- 5.00%/min vs. 11.24 +/- 3.56%/min),相关性较好(r = 0.721, p = 0.0003)。指片监测法测得的15分钟滞留率与采血方法的相关性较好(32.83 +/- 23.99% vs. 28.49 +/- 23.74%, r = 0.944, p = 0.0002)。传统实验室检测与fR15对比分析显示,胆红素-total- t >或= 3 mg/dl (49.71 +/- 26.22% vs 22.23 +/- 13.48%)、甲胎蛋白>或= 100 ng/ml (61.96 +/- 15.84% vs 28.52 +/- 21.74%)、PT延长>或= 3秒(71.46 +/- 16.80% vs 29.03 +/- 21.06%)的患者fR15值较高。结论:常规采血方法与ICG指片监测系统方法具有良好的相关性。ICG手指监测系统为评估肝炎患者肝功能障碍提供了一种替代传统实验室检测的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indocyanine green clearance test in non-cirrhotic hepatitis patients: a comparison and analysis between conventional blood sampling method and Finger Piece Monitoring method.

Background: The indocyanine green (ICG) Finger Piece Monitor system is a non-invasive method for measuring blood ICG concentrations for the evaluation of hepatic function. This study was conducted to determine its clinical usefulness in non-cirrhotic patients.

Methods: Traditional liver function tests, alpha-fetoprotein, prothrombin time, and ICG clearance tests, by both blood sampling method and Finger Piece Monitoring method were performed simultaneously on 56 non-cirrhotic hepatitis patients. The plasma clearance rate (K) and 15-minute retention ratio (R15) of ICG were analyzed and compared with traditional liver function test results.

Results: The clearance rate using the Finger Piece Monitoring method was slightly lower than that of the blood sampling method (9.16 +/- 5.00%/min vs. 11.24 +/- 3.56%/min) with good correlation (r = 0.721, p = 0.0003). The 15-minute retention ratio using the Finger Piece Monitoring method showed better correlation with blood sampling method (32.83 +/- 23.99% vs. 28.49 +/- 23.74%, r = 0.944, p = 0.0002). Analysis between traditional laboratory tests and fR15 revealed a higher fR15 value in patients with bilirubin-total-T > or = 3 mg/dl (49.71 +/- 26.22% vs. 22.23 +/- 13.48%), alpha-fetoprotein > or = 100 ng/ml (61.96 +/- 15.84% vs. 28.52 +/- 21.74%), and PT prolongation > or = 3 sec (71.46 +/- 16.80% vs. 29.03 +/- 21.06%).

Conclusion: There is a good correlation between the conventional blood sampling method and the ICG Finger Piece Monitoring system method. The ICG Finger Monitoring system provides an alternative for traditional laboratory tests for the evaluation of hepatic dysfunction in hepatitis patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信