医院血压测量:工作人员和设备评估

Sl Carney MBBS, PhD, FRACP, Ahb Gillies MB, ChB, PhD, FRACP, Sl Green RN, FAFPHM, O Paterson RN, Ms Taylor RN, Aj Smith DM, FRCP
{"title":"医院血压测量:工作人员和设备评估","authors":"Sl Carney MBBS, PhD, FRACP,&nbsp;Ahb Gillies MB, ChB, PhD, FRACP,&nbsp;Sl Green RN, FAFPHM,&nbsp;O Paterson RN,&nbsp;Ms Taylor RN,&nbsp;Aj Smith DM, FRCP","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00308.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> Evaluation of the ability of clinical staff to measure blood pressure as well as the functional state of hospital sphygmomanometers has consistently demonstrated marked deficiencies. In this study, the working order of all sphygmomanometers (manual and automated) in a teaching hospital was evaluated. Nursing staff were tested on their knowledge and use of such devices and were also asked to estimate the blood pressure from videotape. The accuracy of a commonly used automated device, Dinamap 8100, was also measured. Of 543 manual sphygmomanometers, 14% were in perfect working order although portable devices were more likely to be functional (47% of 36 units). In contrast, all 135 automated portable devices were in perfect working order although service requirements were seldom met. The mean time since last service was 18 months. There appeared to be an inverse correlation between the availability of automated and manual devices and the maintenance of wall-mounted bedside sphygmomanometers. Staff knowledge about manual devices was adequate as was their ability to accurately measure blood pressure using standardised videotape. Forty-two per cent of 31 nurses who completed the test were correct in 9 of 12 blood pressures. A comparison of this result with a comparable group of nurses tested in 1990 did not detect a significant change in competence. Direct evaluation of the commonly used Dinamap 8100 in 47 hospital patients demonstrated a poor correlation with a mercury sphygmomanometer with a D grade (fail) for systolic and a C grade for diastolic pressure. In summary, maintenance of manual sphygmomanometers was very poor, probably due to their lack of use by clinical staff. This was particularly true for units attached to bedside walls. Nursing staff demonstrated significant deficiencies in manual sphygmomanometer use although their skills were similar to those measured several years earlier. Because of the demonstrated inaccuracy of the Dinamap 8100 automated device, the strong trend towards the use of automated devices instead of manual sphygmomanometers within hospitals cannot be supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"19 2","pages":"95-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00308.x","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital blood pressure measurement: Staff and device assessment\",\"authors\":\"Sl Carney MBBS, PhD, FRACP,&nbsp;Ahb Gillies MB, ChB, PhD, FRACP,&nbsp;Sl Green RN, FAFPHM,&nbsp;O Paterson RN,&nbsp;Ms Taylor RN,&nbsp;Aj Smith DM, FRCP\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00308.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <b>Abstract</b> Evaluation of the ability of clinical staff to measure blood pressure as well as the functional state of hospital sphygmomanometers has consistently demonstrated marked deficiencies. In this study, the working order of all sphygmomanometers (manual and automated) in a teaching hospital was evaluated. Nursing staff were tested on their knowledge and use of such devices and were also asked to estimate the blood pressure from videotape. The accuracy of a commonly used automated device, Dinamap 8100, was also measured. Of 543 manual sphygmomanometers, 14% were in perfect working order although portable devices were more likely to be functional (47% of 36 units). In contrast, all 135 automated portable devices were in perfect working order although service requirements were seldom met. The mean time since last service was 18 months. There appeared to be an inverse correlation between the availability of automated and manual devices and the maintenance of wall-mounted bedside sphygmomanometers. Staff knowledge about manual devices was adequate as was their ability to accurately measure blood pressure using standardised videotape. Forty-two per cent of 31 nurses who completed the test were correct in 9 of 12 blood pressures. A comparison of this result with a comparable group of nurses tested in 1990 did not detect a significant change in competence. Direct evaluation of the commonly used Dinamap 8100 in 47 hospital patients demonstrated a poor correlation with a mercury sphygmomanometer with a D grade (fail) for systolic and a C grade for diastolic pressure. In summary, maintenance of manual sphygmomanometers was very poor, probably due to their lack of use by clinical staff. This was particularly true for units attached to bedside walls. Nursing staff demonstrated significant deficiencies in manual sphygmomanometer use although their skills were similar to those measured several years earlier. Because of the demonstrated inaccuracy of the Dinamap 8100 automated device, the strong trend towards the use of automated devices instead of manual sphygmomanometers within hospitals cannot be supported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"95-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00308.x\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00308.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00308.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

临床工作人员测量血压的能力评估以及医院血压计的功能状态一直显示出明显的不足。本研究对某教学医院所有血压计(手动血压计和自动血压计)的工作顺序进行了评估。测试了护理人员对这些设备的知识和使用情况,并要求他们从录像带中估计血压。还测量了常用的自动化设备Dinamap 8100的精度。在543个手动血压计中,14%的血压计工作状态良好,尽管便携式设备更有可能发挥作用(36个血压计中有47%)。相比之下,所有135台自动化便携式设备都工作良好,虽然服务要求很少得到满足。上次礼拜的平均时间是18个月。自动和手动设备的可用性与壁挂式床边血压计的维护之间似乎呈负相关。工作人员对手动设备的了解是足够的,他们使用标准化录像带准确测量血压的能力也是足够的。在完成测试的31名护士中,42%的人在12项血压测试中有9项是正确的。将这一结果与1990年接受测试的一组护士进行比较,并没有发现能力方面的显著变化。对47名医院患者常用的Dinamap 8100的直接评估表明,与收缩压为D级(不合格)、舒张压为C级的汞柱血压计相关性较差。总之,手工血压计的维护非常差,可能是由于临床工作人员缺乏使用。对于安装在床头墙上的设备来说尤其如此。护理人员在使用手动血压计方面表现出明显的缺陷,尽管他们的技能与几年前测量的相似。由于Dinamap 8100自动血压计显示不准确,医院内使用自动血压计代替手动血压计的强烈趋势无法得到支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hospital blood pressure measurement: Staff and device assessment

Abstract Evaluation of the ability of clinical staff to measure blood pressure as well as the functional state of hospital sphygmomanometers has consistently demonstrated marked deficiencies. In this study, the working order of all sphygmomanometers (manual and automated) in a teaching hospital was evaluated. Nursing staff were tested on their knowledge and use of such devices and were also asked to estimate the blood pressure from videotape. The accuracy of a commonly used automated device, Dinamap 8100, was also measured. Of 543 manual sphygmomanometers, 14% were in perfect working order although portable devices were more likely to be functional (47% of 36 units). In contrast, all 135 automated portable devices were in perfect working order although service requirements were seldom met. The mean time since last service was 18 months. There appeared to be an inverse correlation between the availability of automated and manual devices and the maintenance of wall-mounted bedside sphygmomanometers. Staff knowledge about manual devices was adequate as was their ability to accurately measure blood pressure using standardised videotape. Forty-two per cent of 31 nurses who completed the test were correct in 9 of 12 blood pressures. A comparison of this result with a comparable group of nurses tested in 1990 did not detect a significant change in competence. Direct evaluation of the commonly used Dinamap 8100 in 47 hospital patients demonstrated a poor correlation with a mercury sphygmomanometer with a D grade (fail) for systolic and a C grade for diastolic pressure. In summary, maintenance of manual sphygmomanometers was very poor, probably due to their lack of use by clinical staff. This was particularly true for units attached to bedside walls. Nursing staff demonstrated significant deficiencies in manual sphygmomanometer use although their skills were similar to those measured several years earlier. Because of the demonstrated inaccuracy of the Dinamap 8100 automated device, the strong trend towards the use of automated devices instead of manual sphygmomanometers within hospitals cannot be supported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信