应用四场门静脉主动脉旁照射治疗宫颈癌的临床疗效。

T Kodaira, K Karasawa, T Shimizu, Y Tanaka, T Matsuda, A Murakami, K Mizutani
{"title":"应用四场门静脉主动脉旁照射治疗宫颈癌的临床疗效。","authors":"T Kodaira,&nbsp;K Karasawa,&nbsp;T Shimizu,&nbsp;Y Tanaka,&nbsp;T Matsuda,&nbsp;A Murakami,&nbsp;K Mizutani","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:3<170::AID-ROI6>3.0.CO;2-R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paraaortic nodal irradiation (PAI) was thought to be useful in the treatment of cervical cancer, but its clinical application has been limited by a relatively high morbidity. To reduce this morbidity, we routinely applied the four-field technique in PAI. To clarify its efficacy, clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Ninety-seven patients with cervical cancer, who received a minimum 40 Gy of paraaortic irradiation between 1976 and 1994, were enrolled in the analysis. The patients were prescribed PAI using four-field portals with 10 MV photons (mean 50.4 Gy, range 40-70 Gy). The 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 32.2%. As for sequelae determined using the French-Italian glossary, G1a/G2a of stomach and duodenum developed in 26.8/1.0%, G2b of small bowel in 3.1%, G1b of nonspecific abdominal symptoms and/or signs in 12.4%, and G2 of bone in 3.1%. The operative history group had a slightly larger incidence of gastrointestinal complications than those without operative history, but the difference was not statistically significant. Application of four-field portals in PAI was useful, with acceptably low toxicity and successful compliance for moderate-to-high dose irradiation. This suggests that PAI may greatly contribute to the improvement of the therapeutic outcome of cervical carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":20894,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology investigations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:3<170::AID-ROI6>3.0.CO;2-R","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy of applying four-field portals to paraaortic irradiation in the treatment of cervical carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"T Kodaira,&nbsp;K Karasawa,&nbsp;T Shimizu,&nbsp;Y Tanaka,&nbsp;T Matsuda,&nbsp;A Murakami,&nbsp;K Mizutani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:3<170::AID-ROI6>3.0.CO;2-R\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Paraaortic nodal irradiation (PAI) was thought to be useful in the treatment of cervical cancer, but its clinical application has been limited by a relatively high morbidity. To reduce this morbidity, we routinely applied the four-field technique in PAI. To clarify its efficacy, clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Ninety-seven patients with cervical cancer, who received a minimum 40 Gy of paraaortic irradiation between 1976 and 1994, were enrolled in the analysis. The patients were prescribed PAI using four-field portals with 10 MV photons (mean 50.4 Gy, range 40-70 Gy). The 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 32.2%. As for sequelae determined using the French-Italian glossary, G1a/G2a of stomach and duodenum developed in 26.8/1.0%, G2b of small bowel in 3.1%, G1b of nonspecific abdominal symptoms and/or signs in 12.4%, and G2 of bone in 3.1%. The operative history group had a slightly larger incidence of gastrointestinal complications than those without operative history, but the difference was not statistically significant. Application of four-field portals in PAI was useful, with acceptably low toxicity and successful compliance for moderate-to-high dose irradiation. This suggests that PAI may greatly contribute to the improvement of the therapeutic outcome of cervical carcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation oncology investigations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:3<170::AID-ROI6>3.0.CO;2-R\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation oncology investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:3<170::AID-ROI6>3.0.CO;2-R\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:3<170::AID-ROI6>3.0.CO;2-R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

paraortic nodal照射(PAI)被认为是治疗宫颈癌的有效方法,但其较高的发病率限制了其临床应用。为了减少这种发病率,我们在PAI中常规应用四场技术。为明确其疗效,回顾性分析临床资料。在1976年至1994年间接受过至少40戈瑞的主动脉旁辐射的97名宫颈癌患者被纳入分析。采用10 MV光子(平均50.4 Gy,范围40-70 Gy)的四场通道进行PAI治疗。5年病因特异性生存率为32.2%。在使用法语-意大利语词汇表确定的后遗症中,胃和十二指肠的G1a/G2a发生率为26.8/1.0%,小肠的G2b发生率为3.1%,非特异性腹部症状和/或体征的G1b发生率为12.4%,骨骼的G2发生率为3.1%。有手术史组胃肠道并发症发生率略高于无手术史组,但差异无统计学意义。在PAI中应用四场通道是有用的,具有可接受的低毒性和中至高剂量照射的成功依从性。这表明PAI可能对改善宫颈癌的治疗效果有很大的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical efficacy of applying four-field portals to paraaortic irradiation in the treatment of cervical carcinoma.

Paraaortic nodal irradiation (PAI) was thought to be useful in the treatment of cervical cancer, but its clinical application has been limited by a relatively high morbidity. To reduce this morbidity, we routinely applied the four-field technique in PAI. To clarify its efficacy, clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Ninety-seven patients with cervical cancer, who received a minimum 40 Gy of paraaortic irradiation between 1976 and 1994, were enrolled in the analysis. The patients were prescribed PAI using four-field portals with 10 MV photons (mean 50.4 Gy, range 40-70 Gy). The 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 32.2%. As for sequelae determined using the French-Italian glossary, G1a/G2a of stomach and duodenum developed in 26.8/1.0%, G2b of small bowel in 3.1%, G1b of nonspecific abdominal symptoms and/or signs in 12.4%, and G2 of bone in 3.1%. The operative history group had a slightly larger incidence of gastrointestinal complications than those without operative history, but the difference was not statistically significant. Application of four-field portals in PAI was useful, with acceptably low toxicity and successful compliance for moderate-to-high dose irradiation. This suggests that PAI may greatly contribute to the improvement of the therapeutic outcome of cervical carcinoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信