制造过程的病毒验证设计。

D Larzul
{"title":"制造过程的病毒验证设计。","authors":"D Larzul","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many cases, the viral safety evaluation of biological products does not derive solely from direct testing for the presence of contaminants, but also from the demonstration that the manufacturing process is able to inactivate/eliminate them. This is achieved by the voluntary addition of a virus load at various steps of the process and the evaluation of viral reduction during the subsequent steps. The major difficulty for such viral validation studies is less to calculate a reduction factor for each step than to identify clearly and demonstrate the contribution of each in-process parameter to the reduction. Consequently, the first approach consists of the identification of all the parameter which may influence viral reduction. The design of the viral validation needs to take this inventory into account and control experiments must be carried out in parallel with the main spiking experiment, i.e. mainly to: (i) hold controls with and without the biological intermediate product; (ii) control experiments with each individual inactivating/partitioning parameter; (iii) control experiment without stabilizer if necessary. In addition to these process controls, cytotoxicity and interference experiments will allow the use of each in vitro infectivity assay for the testing of processed samples to be validated. For a viral inactivation step, the kinetics of inactivation will be studied and the data will show: (i) a progressive decrease of the viral load over time. If the decrease is too rapid to plot the kinetics, the direct relation between the inactivation and the inactivating parameter has to be demonstrated in complementary experiments; (ii) the reduction obtained when in-process limits are used and (iii) the different phases of inactivation when they exist. Moreover, it is pertinent to evaluate for each treatment the margin of safety derived from the treatment time on the one hand and the strength of the inactivating parameter on the other.</p>","PeriodicalId":11308,"journal":{"name":"Developments in biological standardization","volume":"99 ","pages":"139-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viral validation design of a manufacturing process.\",\"authors\":\"D Larzul\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In many cases, the viral safety evaluation of biological products does not derive solely from direct testing for the presence of contaminants, but also from the demonstration that the manufacturing process is able to inactivate/eliminate them. This is achieved by the voluntary addition of a virus load at various steps of the process and the evaluation of viral reduction during the subsequent steps. The major difficulty for such viral validation studies is less to calculate a reduction factor for each step than to identify clearly and demonstrate the contribution of each in-process parameter to the reduction. Consequently, the first approach consists of the identification of all the parameter which may influence viral reduction. The design of the viral validation needs to take this inventory into account and control experiments must be carried out in parallel with the main spiking experiment, i.e. mainly to: (i) hold controls with and without the biological intermediate product; (ii) control experiments with each individual inactivating/partitioning parameter; (iii) control experiment without stabilizer if necessary. In addition to these process controls, cytotoxicity and interference experiments will allow the use of each in vitro infectivity assay for the testing of processed samples to be validated. For a viral inactivation step, the kinetics of inactivation will be studied and the data will show: (i) a progressive decrease of the viral load over time. If the decrease is too rapid to plot the kinetics, the direct relation between the inactivation and the inactivating parameter has to be demonstrated in complementary experiments; (ii) the reduction obtained when in-process limits are used and (iii) the different phases of inactivation when they exist. Moreover, it is pertinent to evaluate for each treatment the margin of safety derived from the treatment time on the one hand and the strength of the inactivating parameter on the other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developments in biological standardization\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"139-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developments in biological standardization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多情况下,生物制品的病毒安全性评估不仅仅来自对污染物存在的直接测试,还来自制造过程能够灭活/消除它们的证明。这是通过在该过程的各个步骤中自愿添加病毒负荷和在随后步骤中评估病毒减少来实现的。这种病毒验证研究的主要困难不是计算每一步的还原因子,而是清楚地识别和证明每个进程中参数对还原的贡献。因此,第一种方法包括识别可能影响病毒还原的所有参数。病毒验证的设计需要考虑到这个清单,控制实验必须与主要的刺突实验并行进行,即主要是:(i)控制有和不含生物中间产物的控制;(ii)每个个体失活/分区参数的对照实验;(三)必要时进行不加稳定器的控制实验。除了这些过程控制外,细胞毒性和干扰实验将允许使用每种体外感染性试验来验证处理后的样品。对于病毒失活步骤,将研究失活动力学,数据将显示:(i)随着时间的推移,病毒载量逐渐减少。如果下降得太快,无法绘制动力学图,则必须在补充实验中证明失活和失活参数之间的直接关系;(ii)使用进程内限制时获得的减少量;(iii)当它们存在时失活的不同阶段。此外,评估每一种治疗的安全裕度是相关的,这一方面是由治疗时间得出的,另一方面是失活参数的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viral validation design of a manufacturing process.

In many cases, the viral safety evaluation of biological products does not derive solely from direct testing for the presence of contaminants, but also from the demonstration that the manufacturing process is able to inactivate/eliminate them. This is achieved by the voluntary addition of a virus load at various steps of the process and the evaluation of viral reduction during the subsequent steps. The major difficulty for such viral validation studies is less to calculate a reduction factor for each step than to identify clearly and demonstrate the contribution of each in-process parameter to the reduction. Consequently, the first approach consists of the identification of all the parameter which may influence viral reduction. The design of the viral validation needs to take this inventory into account and control experiments must be carried out in parallel with the main spiking experiment, i.e. mainly to: (i) hold controls with and without the biological intermediate product; (ii) control experiments with each individual inactivating/partitioning parameter; (iii) control experiment without stabilizer if necessary. In addition to these process controls, cytotoxicity and interference experiments will allow the use of each in vitro infectivity assay for the testing of processed samples to be validated. For a viral inactivation step, the kinetics of inactivation will be studied and the data will show: (i) a progressive decrease of the viral load over time. If the decrease is too rapid to plot the kinetics, the direct relation between the inactivation and the inactivating parameter has to be demonstrated in complementary experiments; (ii) the reduction obtained when in-process limits are used and (iii) the different phases of inactivation when they exist. Moreover, it is pertinent to evaluate for each treatment the margin of safety derived from the treatment time on the one hand and the strength of the inactivating parameter on the other.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信