六种呼吸器适合性测试方法与模拟医疗保健环境中实际暴露测量的比较:第三部分——验证

C C Coffey, D L Campbell, W R Myers
{"title":"六种呼吸器适合性测试方法与模拟医疗保健环境中实际暴露测量的比较:第三部分——验证","authors":"C C Coffey,&nbsp;D L Campbell,&nbsp;W R Myers","doi":"10.1080/00028899908984454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article, the last in a series of three, describes the validation phase of a study conducted to test the correlation of respirator fit factors to the subject's actual exposure using biological sampling. The study consisted of three phases: protocol development, method comparison testing, and validation. Six quantitative fit-test methods were evaluated in the method comparison testing phase. The two fit methods with the highest correlation with the wearers' measured exposure were a corn oil method (R2 = 0.81) and an ambient aerosol method (R2 = 0.78). Because the ambient aerosol method is more commonly used in the workplace, it was selected for further analysis. In this validation phase, the fit factors measured during the ambient aerosol fit-test were used to calculate the exposures to Freon-113 by using the model determined in the method comparison testing phase of the study. The actual Freon-113 exposures were then measured and compared with the predicted exposures. The results verified that the ambient aerosol method fit factors are highly correlated to the total Freon-113 exposure dose and thus that the model had a predictive ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7930,"journal":{"name":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","volume":"60 3","pages":"363-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00028899908984454","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part III--Validation.\",\"authors\":\"C C Coffey,&nbsp;D L Campbell,&nbsp;W R Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00028899908984454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article, the last in a series of three, describes the validation phase of a study conducted to test the correlation of respirator fit factors to the subject's actual exposure using biological sampling. The study consisted of three phases: protocol development, method comparison testing, and validation. Six quantitative fit-test methods were evaluated in the method comparison testing phase. The two fit methods with the highest correlation with the wearers' measured exposure were a corn oil method (R2 = 0.81) and an ambient aerosol method (R2 = 0.78). Because the ambient aerosol method is more commonly used in the workplace, it was selected for further analysis. In this validation phase, the fit factors measured during the ambient aerosol fit-test were used to calculate the exposures to Freon-113 by using the model determined in the method comparison testing phase of the study. The actual Freon-113 exposures were then measured and compared with the predicted exposures. The results verified that the ambient aerosol method fit factors are highly correlated to the total Freon-113 exposure dose and thus that the model had a predictive ability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"363-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00028899908984454\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文是三篇系列文章中的最后一篇,描述了一项研究的验证阶段,该研究使用生物采样来测试呼吸器适合因素与受试者实际暴露的相关性。研究分为三个阶段:方案制定、方法比较测试和验证。在方法比较检验阶段对6种定量拟合检验方法进行评价。与佩戴者暴露量相关性最高的两种拟合方法是玉米油法(R2 = 0.81)和环境气溶胶法(R2 = 0.78)。由于环境气溶胶法在工作场所更常用,因此选择它进行进一步分析。在此验证阶段,使用在研究方法比较测试阶段确定的模型,使用在环境气溶胶拟合试验期间测量的拟合因子来计算氟利昂-113的暴露量。然后测量实际的氟利昂-113暴露量,并与预测暴露量进行比较。结果表明,环境气溶胶法拟合因子与氟利昂-113总暴露剂量高度相关,模型具有一定的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part III--Validation.

This article, the last in a series of three, describes the validation phase of a study conducted to test the correlation of respirator fit factors to the subject's actual exposure using biological sampling. The study consisted of three phases: protocol development, method comparison testing, and validation. Six quantitative fit-test methods were evaluated in the method comparison testing phase. The two fit methods with the highest correlation with the wearers' measured exposure were a corn oil method (R2 = 0.81) and an ambient aerosol method (R2 = 0.78). Because the ambient aerosol method is more commonly used in the workplace, it was selected for further analysis. In this validation phase, the fit factors measured during the ambient aerosol fit-test were used to calculate the exposures to Freon-113 by using the model determined in the method comparison testing phase of the study. The actual Freon-113 exposures were then measured and compared with the predicted exposures. The results verified that the ambient aerosol method fit factors are highly correlated to the total Freon-113 exposure dose and thus that the model had a predictive ability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信