[局麻药对全静脉麻醉神经外科Mayfield颅骨钳固定血流动力学的影响]。

Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation Pub Date : 1999-01-01
L Schaffranietz, H Rüffert, C Trantakis, V Seifert
{"title":"[局麻药对全静脉麻醉神经外科Mayfield颅骨钳固定血流动力学的影响]。","authors":"L Schaffranietz,&nbsp;H Rüffert,&nbsp;C Trantakis,&nbsp;V Seifert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For neurosurgical procedures, the association between insertion of the Mayfield skull clamp and haemodynamic changes is generally recognized. We investigated the protective effect of two local anaesthetic substances (lidocaine and bupivacaine) under the conditions of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and alfentanil. Forty-two patients undergoing an elective craniotomy (tumor resection) were included in the study and randomly divided into three groups. All patients were given a total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and aflfentanil. After induction, the skin areas for the pin were infiltrated with 0.9% sodium chloride (n = 14, control group 1), 1% lidocain (n = 14, group 2) or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 14, group 3). After an interval of 1 to 2 minutes the pins were inserted. The intra-arterial line was inserted before induction. The haemodynamic parameters heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored continuously. The haemodynamic parameters were recorded at four set times: (1) after induction of anaesthesia, (2) at the onset of the local anaesthesia, (3) at the insertion of the pin-holder, (4) five minutes after insertion. Insertion of the pins led to a significant increase in HR, SAP, MAP and DAP in the control group. These haemodynamic changes can be reduced by local infiltration with lidocaine or bupivacaine. The effect of both substances was the same in our study. Our results suggest that a significant reduction of the haemodynamic effects caused by insertion of the Mayfield skull clamp can be achieved by the use of local anaesthesia. Total intravenous anaesthesia alone with propofol and alfentanil cannot protect against these haemodynamic stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":76993,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","volume":"24 2","pages":"51-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of local anesthetics on hemodynamic effects during Mayfield skull clamp fixation in neurosurgery using total intravenous anesthesia].\",\"authors\":\"L Schaffranietz,&nbsp;H Rüffert,&nbsp;C Trantakis,&nbsp;V Seifert\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For neurosurgical procedures, the association between insertion of the Mayfield skull clamp and haemodynamic changes is generally recognized. We investigated the protective effect of two local anaesthetic substances (lidocaine and bupivacaine) under the conditions of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and alfentanil. Forty-two patients undergoing an elective craniotomy (tumor resection) were included in the study and randomly divided into three groups. All patients were given a total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and aflfentanil. After induction, the skin areas for the pin were infiltrated with 0.9% sodium chloride (n = 14, control group 1), 1% lidocain (n = 14, group 2) or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 14, group 3). After an interval of 1 to 2 minutes the pins were inserted. The intra-arterial line was inserted before induction. The haemodynamic parameters heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored continuously. The haemodynamic parameters were recorded at four set times: (1) after induction of anaesthesia, (2) at the onset of the local anaesthesia, (3) at the insertion of the pin-holder, (4) five minutes after insertion. Insertion of the pins led to a significant increase in HR, SAP, MAP and DAP in the control group. These haemodynamic changes can be reduced by local infiltration with lidocaine or bupivacaine. The effect of both substances was the same in our study. Our results suggest that a significant reduction of the haemodynamic effects caused by insertion of the Mayfield skull clamp can be achieved by the use of local anaesthesia. Total intravenous anaesthesia alone with propofol and alfentanil cannot protect against these haemodynamic stimuli.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"51-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于神经外科手术,Mayfield颅骨钳插入与血流动力学改变之间的关系是公认的。在异丙酚和阿芬太尼全静脉麻醉(TIVA)条件下,观察两种局部麻醉物质(利多卡因和布比卡因)的保护作用。42例择期开颅(肿瘤切除)患者纳入研究,随机分为三组。所有患者均给予异丙酚和阿芬太尼全静脉麻醉。诱导后,用0.9%氯化钠(n = 14,对照组1)、1%利多卡因(n = 14,组2)或0.5%布比卡因(n = 14,组3)浸润针的皮肤区域。间隔1 ~ 2分钟后插入针。诱导前插入动脉内导管。连续监测血流动力学参数心率(HR)、收缩压(SAP)、舒张压(DAP)和平均动脉压(MAP)。在四个设定时间记录血流动力学参数:(1)麻醉诱导后,(2)局部麻醉开始时,(3)针夹插入时,(4)插入后5分钟。针的插入导致对照组的HR、SAP、MAP和DAP显著增加。利多卡因或布比卡因局部浸润可减轻这些血流动力学变化。在我们的研究中,这两种物质的效果是一样的。我们的结果表明,通过局部麻醉可以显著减少梅菲尔德颅骨钳插入引起的血流动力学影响。全静脉麻醉单独使用异丙酚和阿芬太尼不能防止这些血流动力学刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Effect of local anesthetics on hemodynamic effects during Mayfield skull clamp fixation in neurosurgery using total intravenous anesthesia].

For neurosurgical procedures, the association between insertion of the Mayfield skull clamp and haemodynamic changes is generally recognized. We investigated the protective effect of two local anaesthetic substances (lidocaine and bupivacaine) under the conditions of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and alfentanil. Forty-two patients undergoing an elective craniotomy (tumor resection) were included in the study and randomly divided into three groups. All patients were given a total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and aflfentanil. After induction, the skin areas for the pin were infiltrated with 0.9% sodium chloride (n = 14, control group 1), 1% lidocain (n = 14, group 2) or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 14, group 3). After an interval of 1 to 2 minutes the pins were inserted. The intra-arterial line was inserted before induction. The haemodynamic parameters heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored continuously. The haemodynamic parameters were recorded at four set times: (1) after induction of anaesthesia, (2) at the onset of the local anaesthesia, (3) at the insertion of the pin-holder, (4) five minutes after insertion. Insertion of the pins led to a significant increase in HR, SAP, MAP and DAP in the control group. These haemodynamic changes can be reduced by local infiltration with lidocaine or bupivacaine. The effect of both substances was the same in our study. Our results suggest that a significant reduction of the haemodynamic effects caused by insertion of the Mayfield skull clamp can be achieved by the use of local anaesthesia. Total intravenous anaesthesia alone with propofol and alfentanil cannot protect against these haemodynamic stimuli.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信