{"title":"提供初级保健的费用:学术全科医学实践与MGMA基准的比较。","authors":"R P Wenzel, J Girtman, D Costello, M D Nettleman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Market-based healthcare reform has placed great financial pressures on academic departments of internal medicine. The current emphasis and increased recruiting for primary care have not been accompanied by a financially supportive institutional culture or favorable third-party reimbursement system for the generalist practitioners. In one department's analysis, there was a large difference in revenue (-$130,000) compared to a Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) standard, yet a reduced level of compensation for primary-care physicians, $61,000 less per full-time equivalent (FTE). Total overhead per FTE in our department was $80,000 greater than comparable practices of the MGMA standard. We have estimated the institutional strategic costs of having primary-care clinics in three separate locations in the city of Richmond ($74,000/FTE). No viable cost-cutting options placed the primary-care program in positive balance, but the analysis contributed to a creative institutional approach for a solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"7 1","pages":"43-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Costs of providing primary care: comparison of an academic general medicine practice with an MGMA benchmark.\",\"authors\":\"R P Wenzel, J Girtman, D Costello, M D Nettleman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Market-based healthcare reform has placed great financial pressures on academic departments of internal medicine. The current emphasis and increased recruiting for primary care have not been accompanied by a financially supportive institutional culture or favorable third-party reimbursement system for the generalist practitioners. In one department's analysis, there was a large difference in revenue (-$130,000) compared to a Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) standard, yet a reduced level of compensation for primary-care physicians, $61,000 less per full-time equivalent (FTE). Total overhead per FTE in our department was $80,000 greater than comparable practices of the MGMA standard. We have estimated the institutional strategic costs of having primary-care clinics in three separate locations in the city of Richmond ($74,000/FTE). No viable cost-cutting options placed the primary-care program in positive balance, but the analysis contributed to a creative institutional approach for a solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical performance and quality health care\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"43-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical performance and quality health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Costs of providing primary care: comparison of an academic general medicine practice with an MGMA benchmark.
Market-based healthcare reform has placed great financial pressures on academic departments of internal medicine. The current emphasis and increased recruiting for primary care have not been accompanied by a financially supportive institutional culture or favorable third-party reimbursement system for the generalist practitioners. In one department's analysis, there was a large difference in revenue (-$130,000) compared to a Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) standard, yet a reduced level of compensation for primary-care physicians, $61,000 less per full-time equivalent (FTE). Total overhead per FTE in our department was $80,000 greater than comparable practices of the MGMA standard. We have estimated the institutional strategic costs of having primary-care clinics in three separate locations in the city of Richmond ($74,000/FTE). No viable cost-cutting options placed the primary-care program in positive balance, but the analysis contributed to a creative institutional approach for a solution.