提供初级保健的费用:学术全科医学实践与MGMA基准的比较。

R P Wenzel, J Girtman, D Costello, M D Nettleman
{"title":"提供初级保健的费用:学术全科医学实践与MGMA基准的比较。","authors":"R P Wenzel,&nbsp;J Girtman,&nbsp;D Costello,&nbsp;M D Nettleman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Market-based healthcare reform has placed great financial pressures on academic departments of internal medicine. The current emphasis and increased recruiting for primary care have not been accompanied by a financially supportive institutional culture or favorable third-party reimbursement system for the generalist practitioners. In one department's analysis, there was a large difference in revenue (-$130,000) compared to a Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) standard, yet a reduced level of compensation for primary-care physicians, $61,000 less per full-time equivalent (FTE). Total overhead per FTE in our department was $80,000 greater than comparable practices of the MGMA standard. We have estimated the institutional strategic costs of having primary-care clinics in three separate locations in the city of Richmond ($74,000/FTE). No viable cost-cutting options placed the primary-care program in positive balance, but the analysis contributed to a creative institutional approach for a solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"7 1","pages":"43-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Costs of providing primary care: comparison of an academic general medicine practice with an MGMA benchmark.\",\"authors\":\"R P Wenzel,&nbsp;J Girtman,&nbsp;D Costello,&nbsp;M D Nettleman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Market-based healthcare reform has placed great financial pressures on academic departments of internal medicine. The current emphasis and increased recruiting for primary care have not been accompanied by a financially supportive institutional culture or favorable third-party reimbursement system for the generalist practitioners. In one department's analysis, there was a large difference in revenue (-$130,000) compared to a Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) standard, yet a reduced level of compensation for primary-care physicians, $61,000 less per full-time equivalent (FTE). Total overhead per FTE in our department was $80,000 greater than comparable practices of the MGMA standard. We have estimated the institutional strategic costs of having primary-care clinics in three separate locations in the city of Richmond ($74,000/FTE). No viable cost-cutting options placed the primary-care program in positive balance, but the analysis contributed to a creative institutional approach for a solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical performance and quality health care\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"43-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical performance and quality health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

市场化医疗改革给内科学术部门带来了巨大的财政压力。目前对初级保健的重视和增加的招聘并没有伴随着财政支持的机构文化或有利于全科医生的第三方报销制度。在一个部门的分析中,与医疗集团管理协会(MGMA)的标准相比,收入(- 13万美元)差异很大,但初级保健医生的薪酬水平却降低了,全职等效医师(FTE)的薪酬减少了6.1万美元。我们部门每名全职员工的总开销比MGMA标准的可比做法高出80,000美元。我们估计了在里士满市三个不同地点开设初级保健诊所的机构战略成本(74,000美元/FTE)。没有可行的成本削减方案使初级保健项目处于正平衡状态,但分析为解决方案提供了一种创造性的制度方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Costs of providing primary care: comparison of an academic general medicine practice with an MGMA benchmark.

Market-based healthcare reform has placed great financial pressures on academic departments of internal medicine. The current emphasis and increased recruiting for primary care have not been accompanied by a financially supportive institutional culture or favorable third-party reimbursement system for the generalist practitioners. In one department's analysis, there was a large difference in revenue (-$130,000) compared to a Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) standard, yet a reduced level of compensation for primary-care physicians, $61,000 less per full-time equivalent (FTE). Total overhead per FTE in our department was $80,000 greater than comparable practices of the MGMA standard. We have estimated the institutional strategic costs of having primary-care clinics in three separate locations in the city of Richmond ($74,000/FTE). No viable cost-cutting options placed the primary-care program in positive balance, but the analysis contributed to a creative institutional approach for a solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信