良性病理的子宫切除术:腹腔镜手术是否有一席之地?

C Anquetil, S Capella-Alouc, H Fernandez
{"title":"良性病理的子宫切除术:腹腔镜手术是否有一席之地?","authors":"C Anquetil,&nbsp;S Capella-Alouc,&nbsp;H Fernandez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To investigate the alternative routes for hysterectomy for benign disease and the appropriate role of laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study of hysterectomies performed between August 1991 and July 1997.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Hysterectomy for benign disease without prolapse, pelvic floor relaxation.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>359 hysterectomies: vaginal (n = 211), laparoscopically-assisted vaginal (n = 56), and abdominal (n = 92).</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Uterine volume was the principal indication for laparotomy. Laparoscopy was required only in cases of adnexal disorders or when the vaginal access was limited or associated with extensive adhesions. The rate of laparotomies and laparoscopies dropped steadily over the six-year study period: during the last two years, 75% of all hysterectomies were vaginal, and 90% of those for patients without a previous vaginal birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With experienced surgeons, the number of cases in which there appears to be poor vaginal accessibility experience decreases, and indications for vaginal hysterectomies increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":79332,"journal":{"name":"Contraception, fertilite, sexualite (1992)","volume":"27 4","pages":"291-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Hysterectomies for benign pathology: is there a place for laparoscopic surgery?].\",\"authors\":\"C Anquetil,&nbsp;S Capella-Alouc,&nbsp;H Fernandez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To investigate the alternative routes for hysterectomy for benign disease and the appropriate role of laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study of hysterectomies performed between August 1991 and July 1997.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Hysterectomy for benign disease without prolapse, pelvic floor relaxation.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>359 hysterectomies: vaginal (n = 211), laparoscopically-assisted vaginal (n = 56), and abdominal (n = 92).</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Uterine volume was the principal indication for laparotomy. Laparoscopy was required only in cases of adnexal disorders or when the vaginal access was limited or associated with extensive adhesions. The rate of laparotomies and laparoscopies dropped steadily over the six-year study period: during the last two years, 75% of all hysterectomies were vaginal, and 90% of those for patients without a previous vaginal birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With experienced surgeons, the number of cases in which there appears to be poor vaginal accessibility experience decreases, and indications for vaginal hysterectomies increase.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception, fertilite, sexualite (1992)\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"291-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception, fertilite, sexualite (1992)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception, fertilite, sexualite (1992)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:探讨良性疾病子宫切除术的选择途径及腹腔镜手术的适当作用。设计:回顾性研究1991年8月至1997年7月间进行的子宫切除术。单位:大学医院。患者:良性疾病无脱垂、盆底松弛者行子宫切除术。干预:359例子宫切除术:阴道(211例)、腹腔镜辅助下阴道(56例)和腹部(92例)。测量和主要结果:子宫体积是剖腹手术的主要指征。只有在附件疾病或阴道通道受限或伴有广泛粘连的情况下才需要腹腔镜检查。在六年的研究期间,剖腹手术和腹腔镜手术的比例稳步下降:在过去两年中,75%的子宫切除术是阴道手术,90%的子宫切除术是没有阴道分娩的患者。结论:有了经验丰富的外科医生,阴道可达性差的病例减少,阴道子宫切除术的指征增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Hysterectomies for benign pathology: is there a place for laparoscopic surgery?].

Study objective: To investigate the alternative routes for hysterectomy for benign disease and the appropriate role of laparoscopic surgery.

Design: Retrospective study of hysterectomies performed between August 1991 and July 1997.

Setting: University hospital.

Patients: Hysterectomy for benign disease without prolapse, pelvic floor relaxation.

Intervention: 359 hysterectomies: vaginal (n = 211), laparoscopically-assisted vaginal (n = 56), and abdominal (n = 92).

Measurements and main results: Uterine volume was the principal indication for laparotomy. Laparoscopy was required only in cases of adnexal disorders or when the vaginal access was limited or associated with extensive adhesions. The rate of laparotomies and laparoscopies dropped steadily over the six-year study period: during the last two years, 75% of all hysterectomies were vaginal, and 90% of those for patients without a previous vaginal birth.

Conclusion: With experienced surgeons, the number of cases in which there appears to be poor vaginal accessibility experience decreases, and indications for vaginal hysterectomies increase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信