重症监护病房的睡眠镇静算法评估。

G Brown, W Scott
{"title":"重症监护病房的睡眠镇静算法评估。","authors":"G Brown,&nbsp;W Scott","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The difficulty for intensive care unit (ICU) patients to obtain frequent and extensive sleep has been well-documented. This project assessed the benefit of an algorithm of pharmacological assistance (lorazepam and methotrimeprazine) on sedation level and sleep duration in the ICU. The setting was a 15-bed closed ICU dealing with medical and surgical patients in a tertiary care, teaching hospital. Desired and actual levels of sedation for individual patients were determined hourly by the bedside nurse. Medications could be administered to facilitate achieving the desired level of sedation. Our results should no difference occurred in the achievement of the target sedation or duration of sleep with the implementation of the sedation algorithm. The amount of additional medication required during the night did change with the implementation of the sedation algorithm. A reduction in the amount of diazepam, morphine, and additional methotrimeprazine was noted. Efforts to change nursing practice will be required to improve the quality and quantity of sleep in ICU patients. This clinical evaluation demonstrates that the implementation of an algorithm for medication use is not effective alone in obtaining the desired level and duration of sleep in ICU patients. Nursing practice should continue to look at non-pharmacological factors, such as environmental noise, patient interruptions, and patient care practice to determine strategies in addition to medications which would aid the critically ill patient in achieving adequate sleep.</p>","PeriodicalId":79699,"journal":{"name":"Official journal of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses","volume":"9 4","pages":"20-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of a sedative algorithm for sleep in an intensive care unit.\",\"authors\":\"G Brown,&nbsp;W Scott\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The difficulty for intensive care unit (ICU) patients to obtain frequent and extensive sleep has been well-documented. This project assessed the benefit of an algorithm of pharmacological assistance (lorazepam and methotrimeprazine) on sedation level and sleep duration in the ICU. The setting was a 15-bed closed ICU dealing with medical and surgical patients in a tertiary care, teaching hospital. Desired and actual levels of sedation for individual patients were determined hourly by the bedside nurse. Medications could be administered to facilitate achieving the desired level of sedation. Our results should no difference occurred in the achievement of the target sedation or duration of sleep with the implementation of the sedation algorithm. The amount of additional medication required during the night did change with the implementation of the sedation algorithm. A reduction in the amount of diazepam, morphine, and additional methotrimeprazine was noted. Efforts to change nursing practice will be required to improve the quality and quantity of sleep in ICU patients. This clinical evaluation demonstrates that the implementation of an algorithm for medication use is not effective alone in obtaining the desired level and duration of sleep in ICU patients. Nursing practice should continue to look at non-pharmacological factors, such as environmental noise, patient interruptions, and patient care practice to determine strategies in addition to medications which would aid the critically ill patient in achieving adequate sleep.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Official journal of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"20-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Official journal of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Official journal of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重症监护病房(ICU)患者难以获得频繁和广泛的睡眠已经得到了充分的证明。本项目评估了药物辅助算法(劳拉西泮和甲氨美嗪)对ICU镇静水平和睡眠时间的益处。这是一个15张床位的封闭ICU,在三级护理教学医院处理内科和外科病人。每个病人的期望和实际镇静水平每小时由床边护士决定。可以使用药物来促进达到所需的镇静水平。我们的结果应该在实现目标镇静或睡眠持续时间与镇静算法的实施没有差异。夜间所需的额外药物量确实随着镇静算法的实施而改变。注意到地西泮、吗啡和额外的甲氨美嗪的用量减少。需要努力改变护理实践,以改善ICU患者的睡眠质量和数量。这项临床评估表明,单独实施药物使用算法在获得ICU患者所需的睡眠水平和持续时间方面并不有效。护理实践应继续关注非药物因素,如环境噪音、患者干扰和患者护理实践,以确定除药物外有助于危重患者获得充足睡眠的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of a sedative algorithm for sleep in an intensive care unit.

The difficulty for intensive care unit (ICU) patients to obtain frequent and extensive sleep has been well-documented. This project assessed the benefit of an algorithm of pharmacological assistance (lorazepam and methotrimeprazine) on sedation level and sleep duration in the ICU. The setting was a 15-bed closed ICU dealing with medical and surgical patients in a tertiary care, teaching hospital. Desired and actual levels of sedation for individual patients were determined hourly by the bedside nurse. Medications could be administered to facilitate achieving the desired level of sedation. Our results should no difference occurred in the achievement of the target sedation or duration of sleep with the implementation of the sedation algorithm. The amount of additional medication required during the night did change with the implementation of the sedation algorithm. A reduction in the amount of diazepam, morphine, and additional methotrimeprazine was noted. Efforts to change nursing practice will be required to improve the quality and quantity of sleep in ICU patients. This clinical evaluation demonstrates that the implementation of an algorithm for medication use is not effective alone in obtaining the desired level and duration of sleep in ICU patients. Nursing practice should continue to look at non-pharmacological factors, such as environmental noise, patient interruptions, and patient care practice to determine strategies in addition to medications which would aid the critically ill patient in achieving adequate sleep.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信