刷眼睑对眼睑边缘的影响。

J V Greiner, C D Leahy, T Glonek, S L Hearn, D Auerbach, L Davies
{"title":"刷眼睑对眼睑边缘的影响。","authors":"J V Greiner,&nbsp;C D Leahy,&nbsp;T Glonek,&nbsp;S L Hearn,&nbsp;D Auerbach,&nbsp;L Davies","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of eyelid scrubbing with an eyelid cleansing solution (ECS) to eyelid scrubbing with ECS and the addition of antibacterial or anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals on the clinical appearance, microbial status, tissue histology, and the inflammatory cell profile of the normal eyelid margin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyelid scrubbing was performed twice daily using ECS; ECS with the antibacterial sulfacetamide (ECS+); and ECS with sulfacetamide and prednisolone acetate (ECS++) over a 21 day period on three groups of 16 rabbits with clinically normal eyelids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant hyperemia of the margin occurred in all three groups over the 3 week period; however, the degree of hyperemia was less with ECS+ (P<0.05) and ECS++ (P<0.05). Chemosis, tearing, mucus discharge, and the microbial status were not significantly different than controls. There were no marked histologic differences in the tissues, except for increased red blood cell packing in the small vessels near the lid margins in scrubbed eyelids, consistent with hyperemia. The inflammatory cell profile showed minimal changes that were not statistically significant in any of the three groups, except that >50% of mast cells showed evidence of degranulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of ECS with an antibiotic, or an antibiotic and steroid solution, resulted in less inflammation than scrubbing with ECS alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"25 2","pages":"109-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of eyelid scrubbing on the lid margin.\",\"authors\":\"J V Greiner,&nbsp;C D Leahy,&nbsp;T Glonek,&nbsp;S L Hearn,&nbsp;D Auerbach,&nbsp;L Davies\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of eyelid scrubbing with an eyelid cleansing solution (ECS) to eyelid scrubbing with ECS and the addition of antibacterial or anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals on the clinical appearance, microbial status, tissue histology, and the inflammatory cell profile of the normal eyelid margin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyelid scrubbing was performed twice daily using ECS; ECS with the antibacterial sulfacetamide (ECS+); and ECS with sulfacetamide and prednisolone acetate (ECS++) over a 21 day period on three groups of 16 rabbits with clinically normal eyelids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant hyperemia of the margin occurred in all three groups over the 3 week period; however, the degree of hyperemia was less with ECS+ (P<0.05) and ECS++ (P<0.05). Chemosis, tearing, mucus discharge, and the microbial status were not significantly different than controls. There were no marked histologic differences in the tissues, except for increased red blood cell packing in the small vessels near the lid margins in scrubbed eyelids, consistent with hyperemia. The inflammatory cell profile showed minimal changes that were not statistically significant in any of the three groups, except that >50% of mast cells showed evidence of degranulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of ECS with an antibiotic, or an antibiotic and steroid solution, resulted in less inflammation than scrubbing with ECS alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"109-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较用眼睑清洁液(ECS)擦洗眼睑与用ECS擦洗眼睑并添加抗菌或抗炎药物对正常眼睑缘的临床外观、微生物状态、组织组织学和炎症细胞谱的影响。方法:采用ECS刷眼睑,每日2次;ECS与抗菌磺胺(ECS+);三组16只眼睑临床正常的家兔,分别用磺胺和醋酸泼尼松龙(ecs++)进行ECS治疗,疗程21 d。结果:3周内三组均出现明显的切缘充血;然而,ECS+的充血程度较轻(P50%的肥大细胞显示脱颗粒的证据)。结论:与单独使用ECS擦洗相比,使用ECS联合抗生素或抗生素和类固醇溶液导致的炎症更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of eyelid scrubbing on the lid margin.

Purpose: To compare the effects of eyelid scrubbing with an eyelid cleansing solution (ECS) to eyelid scrubbing with ECS and the addition of antibacterial or anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals on the clinical appearance, microbial status, tissue histology, and the inflammatory cell profile of the normal eyelid margin.

Methods: Eyelid scrubbing was performed twice daily using ECS; ECS with the antibacterial sulfacetamide (ECS+); and ECS with sulfacetamide and prednisolone acetate (ECS++) over a 21 day period on three groups of 16 rabbits with clinically normal eyelids.

Results: Significant hyperemia of the margin occurred in all three groups over the 3 week period; however, the degree of hyperemia was less with ECS+ (P<0.05) and ECS++ (P<0.05). Chemosis, tearing, mucus discharge, and the microbial status were not significantly different than controls. There were no marked histologic differences in the tissues, except for increased red blood cell packing in the small vessels near the lid margins in scrubbed eyelids, consistent with hyperemia. The inflammatory cell profile showed minimal changes that were not statistically significant in any of the three groups, except that >50% of mast cells showed evidence of degranulation.

Conclusions: Use of ECS with an antibiotic, or an antibiotic and steroid solution, resulted in less inflammation than scrubbing with ECS alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信