肝素和低分子肝素在静脉血栓栓塞治疗中的作用

MD, FRCP(C), FACP, FCCP Graham F. Pineo (Professor of Medicine and Oncology, Director, Thrombosis Research Unit) , MB BS, MSc, FRCP(C), FACP, FCCP Russell D. Hull (Professor of Medicine and Director, Thrombosis Research Unit)
{"title":"肝素和低分子肝素在静脉血栓栓塞治疗中的作用","authors":"MD, FRCP(C), FACP, FCCP Graham F. Pineo (Professor of Medicine and Oncology, Director, Thrombosis Research Unit) ,&nbsp;MB BS, MSc, FRCP(C), FACP, FCCP Russell D. Hull (Professor of Medicine and Director, Thrombosis Research Unit)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3536(98)80086-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) continues to constitute a major clinical challenge. Effective and safe prophylactic measures against venous thromboembolism are now available for most high risk patients. In spite of this, pulmonary embolism is responsible for approximately 150 000 to 200 000 deaths per year in the United States alone. Over the past 20 years, based on a number of high quality (Level I) clinical trials, patterns of practice with respect to the treatment of venous thromboembolism have changed dramatically. The standard treatment of venous thromboembolism has been the use of unfractionated heparin by continuous intravenous infusion, with laboratory monitoring using the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), with warfarin starting on day 1 or 2 and continued for 3 months. Unfractionated heparin has withstood the test of time and has been shown to be safe and effective in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism and death in numerous clinical trials. The response of individual patients to heparin is highly variable, requiring frequent laboratory monitoring. Heparin has a number of other troublesome side effects including bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis. The low-molecular-weight heparins have a number of advantages over unfractionated heparin. In particular, their increased bioavailability and prolonged half-life permit once daily subcutaneous injections and their predictable antithrombotic response based on body weight permits treatment without laboratory monitoring. Low-molecular-weight heparin in therapeutic doses causes less bleeding than unfractionated heparin and evidence is accumulating that the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis are decreased as well. In individual clinical trials and meta-analyses, low-molecular-weight heparin treatment results in decreased recurrent thromboembolism, major bleeding and death when compared with unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. These agents have also been shown to be both effective and safe for the out-of-hospital treatment of venous thrombosis. Therefore, in many countries, low-molecular-weight heparin has replaced unfractionated heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77029,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical haematology","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 621-637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3536(98)80086-3","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5 Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism\",\"authors\":\"MD, FRCP(C), FACP, FCCP Graham F. Pineo (Professor of Medicine and Oncology, Director, Thrombosis Research Unit) ,&nbsp;MB BS, MSc, FRCP(C), FACP, FCCP Russell D. Hull (Professor of Medicine and Director, Thrombosis Research Unit)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0950-3536(98)80086-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) continues to constitute a major clinical challenge. Effective and safe prophylactic measures against venous thromboembolism are now available for most high risk patients. In spite of this, pulmonary embolism is responsible for approximately 150 000 to 200 000 deaths per year in the United States alone. Over the past 20 years, based on a number of high quality (Level I) clinical trials, patterns of practice with respect to the treatment of venous thromboembolism have changed dramatically. The standard treatment of venous thromboembolism has been the use of unfractionated heparin by continuous intravenous infusion, with laboratory monitoring using the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), with warfarin starting on day 1 or 2 and continued for 3 months. Unfractionated heparin has withstood the test of time and has been shown to be safe and effective in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism and death in numerous clinical trials. The response of individual patients to heparin is highly variable, requiring frequent laboratory monitoring. Heparin has a number of other troublesome side effects including bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis. The low-molecular-weight heparins have a number of advantages over unfractionated heparin. In particular, their increased bioavailability and prolonged half-life permit once daily subcutaneous injections and their predictable antithrombotic response based on body weight permits treatment without laboratory monitoring. Low-molecular-weight heparin in therapeutic doses causes less bleeding than unfractionated heparin and evidence is accumulating that the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis are decreased as well. In individual clinical trials and meta-analyses, low-molecular-weight heparin treatment results in decreased recurrent thromboembolism, major bleeding and death when compared with unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. These agents have also been shown to be both effective and safe for the out-of-hospital treatment of venous thrombosis. Therefore, in many countries, low-molecular-weight heparin has replaced unfractionated heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bailliere's clinical haematology\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 621-637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3536(98)80086-3\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bailliere's clinical haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950353698800863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950353698800863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

静脉血栓栓塞(深静脉血栓和肺栓塞)仍然是一个主要的临床挑战。针对静脉血栓栓塞的有效和安全的预防措施现在可用于大多数高危患者。尽管如此,仅在美国,肺栓塞每年就造成大约15万至20万人死亡。在过去的20年里,基于一些高质量的(一级)临床试验,静脉血栓栓塞治疗的实践模式发生了巨大变化。静脉血栓栓塞的标准治疗方法是持续静脉输注未分离肝素,使用活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)进行实验室监测,华法林从第1天或第2天开始,持续3个月。未分离肝素经受住了时间的考验,在许多临床试验中已被证明在预防静脉血栓栓塞复发和死亡方面是安全有效的。个别患者对肝素的反应变化很大,需要经常进行实验室监测。肝素还有其他一些麻烦的副作用,包括出血、肝素引起的血小板减少症和骨质疏松症。与未分离的肝素相比,低分子量肝素具有许多优点。特别是,它们增加的生物利用度和延长的半衰期允许每天一次皮下注射,并且基于体重的可预测的抗血栓反应允许无需实验室监测治疗。治疗剂量的低分子量肝素比未分离肝素引起的出血少,并且越来越多的证据表明肝素引起的血小板减少症和骨质疏松症的发生率也降低了。在个体临床试验和荟萃分析中,与未分离肝素治疗深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞相比,低分子肝素治疗可减少复发性血栓栓塞、大出血和死亡。这些药物也被证明是有效和安全的院外治疗静脉血栓形成。因此,在许多国家,低分子肝素已取代未分离肝素用于静脉血栓栓塞的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
5 Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) continues to constitute a major clinical challenge. Effective and safe prophylactic measures against venous thromboembolism are now available for most high risk patients. In spite of this, pulmonary embolism is responsible for approximately 150 000 to 200 000 deaths per year in the United States alone. Over the past 20 years, based on a number of high quality (Level I) clinical trials, patterns of practice with respect to the treatment of venous thromboembolism have changed dramatically. The standard treatment of venous thromboembolism has been the use of unfractionated heparin by continuous intravenous infusion, with laboratory monitoring using the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), with warfarin starting on day 1 or 2 and continued for 3 months. Unfractionated heparin has withstood the test of time and has been shown to be safe and effective in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism and death in numerous clinical trials. The response of individual patients to heparin is highly variable, requiring frequent laboratory monitoring. Heparin has a number of other troublesome side effects including bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis. The low-molecular-weight heparins have a number of advantages over unfractionated heparin. In particular, their increased bioavailability and prolonged half-life permit once daily subcutaneous injections and their predictable antithrombotic response based on body weight permits treatment without laboratory monitoring. Low-molecular-weight heparin in therapeutic doses causes less bleeding than unfractionated heparin and evidence is accumulating that the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis are decreased as well. In individual clinical trials and meta-analyses, low-molecular-weight heparin treatment results in decreased recurrent thromboembolism, major bleeding and death when compared with unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. These agents have also been shown to be both effective and safe for the out-of-hospital treatment of venous thrombosis. Therefore, in many countries, low-molecular-weight heparin has replaced unfractionated heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信