{"title":"尸检诊断可增加DRG报销。","authors":"J Holmes, D M Baer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine how missed clinical diagnoses revealed at autopsy might affect third-party payment through DRGs, the authors performed a retrospective comparison of clinical and pathologic diagnoses in 100 consecutive cases that came to autopsy. In 13 of these cases, the autopsy findings resulted in a change in DRG assignment, which could have produced an additional $14,235 for the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":80113,"journal":{"name":"Pathologist","volume":"40 9","pages":"36-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autopsy diagnoses can increase DRG reimbursement.\",\"authors\":\"J Holmes, D M Baer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To determine how missed clinical diagnoses revealed at autopsy might affect third-party payment through DRGs, the authors performed a retrospective comparison of clinical and pathologic diagnoses in 100 consecutive cases that came to autopsy. In 13 of these cases, the autopsy findings resulted in a change in DRG assignment, which could have produced an additional $14,235 for the hospital.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathologist\",\"volume\":\"40 9\",\"pages\":\"36-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
To determine how missed clinical diagnoses revealed at autopsy might affect third-party payment through DRGs, the authors performed a retrospective comparison of clinical and pathologic diagnoses in 100 consecutive cases that came to autopsy. In 13 of these cases, the autopsy findings resulted in a change in DRG assignment, which could have produced an additional $14,235 for the hospital.