1988年的医疗灾难保险法案及其对雇主资助的退休人员医疗计划的影响。

Employee relations law journal Pub Date : 1988-12-01
M S Melbinger, T O'Donnell
{"title":"1988年的医疗灾难保险法案及其对雇主资助的退休人员医疗计划的影响。","authors":"M S Melbinger,&nbsp;T O'Donnell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988 (MECCA) significantly enlarges the scope of federally funded health care benefits for elderly Americans. Since Medicare's inception in 1965, several inadequacies have become apparent, especially the absence of coverage for catastrophic illnesses. Now MECCA inhibits the potential financial ruin of elderly Americans faced with overwhelming, extended medical costs. The Act is budget-neutral and can reduce employers' Social Security payroll tax costs. However, the costs and complications of the maintenance-of-effort provision refunds and potential employee resistance to raised Medicare premiums, which could force some beneficiaries to cancel Part B participation and increase reliance on employer-sponsored plans, do pose problems for employers. Options and alternatives to these new opportunities and concerns are detailed herein.</p>","PeriodicalId":79590,"journal":{"name":"Employee relations law journal","volume":"14 3","pages":"399-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988 and its impact on employer-sponsored retiree medical plans.\",\"authors\":\"M S Melbinger,&nbsp;T O'Donnell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988 (MECCA) significantly enlarges the scope of federally funded health care benefits for elderly Americans. Since Medicare's inception in 1965, several inadequacies have become apparent, especially the absence of coverage for catastrophic illnesses. Now MECCA inhibits the potential financial ruin of elderly Americans faced with overwhelming, extended medical costs. The Act is budget-neutral and can reduce employers' Social Security payroll tax costs. However, the costs and complications of the maintenance-of-effort provision refunds and potential employee resistance to raised Medicare premiums, which could force some beneficiaries to cancel Part B participation and increase reliance on employer-sponsored plans, do pose problems for employers. Options and alternatives to these new opportunities and concerns are detailed herein.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employee relations law journal\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"399-406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employee relations law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee relations law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1988年的《医疗保险灾难覆盖法案》(MECCA)大大扩大了美国老年人联邦资助的医疗保健福利的范围。自1965年医疗保险成立以来,几个不足之处已经变得明显,尤其是对灾难性疾病的覆盖范围的缺失。现在,麦加抑制了美国老年人面临巨大的、延长的医疗费用的潜在经济损失。该法案是预算中性的,可以减少雇主的社会保障工资税成本。然而,成本和复杂性的努力维持条款退款和潜在的员工抵制提高医疗保险保费,这可能迫使一些受益人取消参加B部分,增加对雇主赞助计划的依赖,确实给雇主带来了问题。这些新机会和问题的选择和替代方案在此详细说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988 and its impact on employer-sponsored retiree medical plans.

The Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988 (MECCA) significantly enlarges the scope of federally funded health care benefits for elderly Americans. Since Medicare's inception in 1965, several inadequacies have become apparent, especially the absence of coverage for catastrophic illnesses. Now MECCA inhibits the potential financial ruin of elderly Americans faced with overwhelming, extended medical costs. The Act is budget-neutral and can reduce employers' Social Security payroll tax costs. However, the costs and complications of the maintenance-of-effort provision refunds and potential employee resistance to raised Medicare premiums, which could force some beneficiaries to cancel Part B participation and increase reliance on employer-sponsored plans, do pose problems for employers. Options and alternatives to these new opportunities and concerns are detailed herein.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信