{"title":"医疗保险风险合同——成功还是失败?","authors":"F J Wenzel, J Malcolm","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent legislation has led to a new popularity in risk contracting. In 1980 a demonstration was begun by the Health Care Financing Administration that provided input for the current capitation program. Administrators from two groups involved in the demonstration program--the Marshfield Clinic and MedCenters Health Plan--offer the unique perspectives of a medical group practice and a health maintenance organization. Significant issues for any group considering entering a Medicare risk based contract are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":80068,"journal":{"name":"Medical group management","volume":"33 3","pages":"30-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare risk contracts--success or failure?\",\"authors\":\"F J Wenzel, J Malcolm\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent legislation has led to a new popularity in risk contracting. In 1980 a demonstration was begun by the Health Care Financing Administration that provided input for the current capitation program. Administrators from two groups involved in the demonstration program--the Marshfield Clinic and MedCenters Health Plan--offer the unique perspectives of a medical group practice and a health maintenance organization. Significant issues for any group considering entering a Medicare risk based contract are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical group management\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"30-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical group management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical group management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recent legislation has led to a new popularity in risk contracting. In 1980 a demonstration was begun by the Health Care Financing Administration that provided input for the current capitation program. Administrators from two groups involved in the demonstration program--the Marshfield Clinic and MedCenters Health Plan--offer the unique perspectives of a medical group practice and a health maintenance organization. Significant issues for any group considering entering a Medicare risk based contract are discussed.