医疗保健决策,第二部分。无行为能力病人的选择。

K Grant, S R Huntington
{"title":"医疗保健决策,第二部分。无行为能力病人的选择。","authors":"K Grant,&nbsp;S R Huntington","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The traditional, informal approach to making medical decisions for incapacitated patients is often inappropriate today. Guidelines are needed in two major areas: assessing incapacity and seeking surrogate decision makers. Judicially declared incompetency does not necessarily imply incapacity to make medical choices. Proposed standards for determining incapacity require a multistep evaluation of the patient's abilities to understand, reason, and communicate. When decisions must be made for an incapacitated patient, priority is given to the patient's previously stated preferences. An advance directive--living will or durable power of attorney--simplifies the process. If no advance directive was prepared, a surrogate decision maker may be designated according to applicable state statutes. Standards are still evolving for protecting the autonomy and best interests of vulnerable, incapacitated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":79709,"journal":{"name":"Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)","volume":"13 7","pages":"76-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health-care decision making, Part II. Choices for incapacitated patients.\",\"authors\":\"K Grant,&nbsp;S R Huntington\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The traditional, informal approach to making medical decisions for incapacitated patients is often inappropriate today. Guidelines are needed in two major areas: assessing incapacity and seeking surrogate decision makers. Judicially declared incompetency does not necessarily imply incapacity to make medical choices. Proposed standards for determining incapacity require a multistep evaluation of the patient's abilities to understand, reason, and communicate. When decisions must be made for an incapacitated patient, priority is given to the patient's previously stated preferences. An advance directive--living will or durable power of attorney--simplifies the process. If no advance directive was prepared, a surrogate decision maker may be designated according to applicable state statutes. Standards are still evolving for protecting the autonomy and best interests of vulnerable, incapacitated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"76-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的、非正式的方法来为丧失行为能力的病人做出医疗决定,在今天往往是不合适的。需要在两个主要领域制定准则:评估丧失能力和寻找替代决策者。司法上宣布的无行为能力并不一定意味着没有做出医疗选择的能力。确定残疾的拟议标准要求对患者的理解、推理和沟通能力进行多步骤评估。当必须为无行为能力的病人作出决定时,优先考虑病人先前陈述的偏好。预先指示——生前遗嘱或持久授权书——简化了这一过程。如果未准备预先指示,可根据适用的州法规指定代理决策者。保护脆弱、无行为能力患者的自主权和最大利益的标准仍在不断发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health-care decision making, Part II. Choices for incapacitated patients.

The traditional, informal approach to making medical decisions for incapacitated patients is often inappropriate today. Guidelines are needed in two major areas: assessing incapacity and seeking surrogate decision makers. Judicially declared incompetency does not necessarily imply incapacity to make medical choices. Proposed standards for determining incapacity require a multistep evaluation of the patient's abilities to understand, reason, and communicate. When decisions must be made for an incapacitated patient, priority is given to the patient's previously stated preferences. An advance directive--living will or durable power of attorney--simplifies the process. If no advance directive was prepared, a surrogate decision maker may be designated according to applicable state statutes. Standards are still evolving for protecting the autonomy and best interests of vulnerable, incapacitated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信