地方政府的健康促进:英国经验。

G Moran
{"title":"地方政府的健康促进:英国经验。","authors":"G Moran","doi":"10.1093/heapro/1.2.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, the development of health promotion work in Britain centred largely upon the activities of elected local authorities. From the mid-nineteenth century onwards, these authorities were primarily responsible both for major interventions in the physical environment, such as improved housing and sanitation, and for the development of community-based preventive and primary care services, such as ante-natal care, health-visiting and district nursing. The importance attached to such work was underlined by the statutory requirement that local authorities should appoint a Medical Officer of Health who could not be dismissed without specific Ministerial approval. Yet in recent decades, this long-standing tradition has been undermined, with both public health doctors and the community health services being displaced from their historical local authority base and placed instead within the the National Health Service, where they are substantially outnumbered by their hospital-based colleagues. As a result, a major political and administrative focus for developing public health approaches has largely disappeared. This loss of a health focus has become a matter of concern to a growing number of local authorities in Britain; a concern which reflects their public health tradition and newer policy issues and approaches which began to affect British local authorities from the late 1970s onwards. This paper considers the example of one such authority, the London Borough of Greenwich, where the author was employed during the early 1980s. In particular, it examines the political and practical problems faced when attempting a systematic review of the authority's role and potential for promoting health through its policies on housing. In the light of this experience, some tentative suggestions are made about the kinds of structures which will be needed if local authorities are to revitalise their public health tradition in a political and economic climate hostile even to existing levels of State intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":79940,"journal":{"name":"Health promotion (Oxford, England)","volume":"1 2","pages":"191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/heapro/1.2.191","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health promotion in local government: a British experience.\",\"authors\":\"G Moran\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/1.2.191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Historically, the development of health promotion work in Britain centred largely upon the activities of elected local authorities. From the mid-nineteenth century onwards, these authorities were primarily responsible both for major interventions in the physical environment, such as improved housing and sanitation, and for the development of community-based preventive and primary care services, such as ante-natal care, health-visiting and district nursing. The importance attached to such work was underlined by the statutory requirement that local authorities should appoint a Medical Officer of Health who could not be dismissed without specific Ministerial approval. Yet in recent decades, this long-standing tradition has been undermined, with both public health doctors and the community health services being displaced from their historical local authority base and placed instead within the the National Health Service, where they are substantially outnumbered by their hospital-based colleagues. As a result, a major political and administrative focus for developing public health approaches has largely disappeared. This loss of a health focus has become a matter of concern to a growing number of local authorities in Britain; a concern which reflects their public health tradition and newer policy issues and approaches which began to affect British local authorities from the late 1970s onwards. This paper considers the example of one such authority, the London Borough of Greenwich, where the author was employed during the early 1980s. In particular, it examines the political and practical problems faced when attempting a systematic review of the authority's role and potential for promoting health through its policies on housing. In the light of this experience, some tentative suggestions are made about the kinds of structures which will be needed if local authorities are to revitalise their public health tradition in a political and economic climate hostile even to existing levels of State intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health promotion (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"191-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/heapro/1.2.191\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health promotion (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/1.2.191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health promotion (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/1.2.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

历史上,英国健康促进工作的发展主要集中在选举产生的地方当局的活动上。从19世纪中期开始,这些当局主要负责对自然环境进行重大干预,如改善住房和卫生设施,以及发展以社区为基础的预防和初级保健服务,如产前护理、保健访问和地区护理。法定要求地方当局应任命一名卫生医务官员,未经部长的具体批准,不得将其解雇,这突显了对这类工作的重视。然而,近几十年来,这一长期传统遭到破坏,公共卫生医生和社区卫生服务机构都从其历史上的地方当局基地转移到国家卫生服务机构,在那里他们的人数远远超过医院的同事。因此,制定公共卫生办法的主要政治和行政重点基本上消失了。越来越多的英国地方当局已经开始关注卫生重点的丧失;这一关切反映了他们的公共卫生传统以及从20世纪70年代末开始影响英国地方当局的新政策问题和方法。本文考虑了一个这样的权威的例子,伦敦格林尼治自治市,作者在20世纪80年代初受雇于那里。特别是,它审查了在试图系统审查当局通过其住房政策促进健康的作用和潜力时所面临的政治和实际问题。根据这一经验,就地方当局要在一种甚至对现有水平的国家干预都充满敌意的政治和经济气候中振兴其公共卫生传统所需要的结构类型提出了一些尝试性建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health promotion in local government: a British experience.

Historically, the development of health promotion work in Britain centred largely upon the activities of elected local authorities. From the mid-nineteenth century onwards, these authorities were primarily responsible both for major interventions in the physical environment, such as improved housing and sanitation, and for the development of community-based preventive and primary care services, such as ante-natal care, health-visiting and district nursing. The importance attached to such work was underlined by the statutory requirement that local authorities should appoint a Medical Officer of Health who could not be dismissed without specific Ministerial approval. Yet in recent decades, this long-standing tradition has been undermined, with both public health doctors and the community health services being displaced from their historical local authority base and placed instead within the the National Health Service, where they are substantially outnumbered by their hospital-based colleagues. As a result, a major political and administrative focus for developing public health approaches has largely disappeared. This loss of a health focus has become a matter of concern to a growing number of local authorities in Britain; a concern which reflects their public health tradition and newer policy issues and approaches which began to affect British local authorities from the late 1970s onwards. This paper considers the example of one such authority, the London Borough of Greenwich, where the author was employed during the early 1980s. In particular, it examines the political and practical problems faced when attempting a systematic review of the authority's role and potential for promoting health through its policies on housing. In the light of this experience, some tentative suggestions are made about the kinds of structures which will be needed if local authorities are to revitalise their public health tradition in a political and economic climate hostile even to existing levels of State intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信