去机构化,另一种方式:意大利精神卫生改革。

O De Leonardis, D Mauri, F Rotelli
{"title":"去机构化,另一种方式:意大利精神卫生改革。","authors":"O De Leonardis,&nbsp;D Mauri,&nbsp;F Rotelli","doi":"10.1093/heapro/1.2.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article describes the Italian experience of deinstitutionalization in psychiatry, a reform which has attracted international recognition as being the only instance of an industrial society eliminating detention in a mental hospital from its range of mental health agencies and services. The first part of the article highlights the differences between the Italian experience and psychiatric reforms in Europe and the US, where deinstitutionalization has been reduced to dehospitalization. The problems and failings of these reforms are examined. The second part describes the operation, very different in content and method from the above quoted experiences, of the Italian form of deinstitutionalization. Starting from a critique of the rationalistic problem-solution \"paradign\" in psychiatry, it has developed as a complex social process which: a) involves all its subjects as active participants, b) transforms the power relationship existing between the patient (and citizen) and the institution, c) creates mental health services which completely replace detention in mental hospitals by deconstructing them and reconverting the material and human resources found in them. An example of this reconversion is given in the way in which mental health services have been organized in Trieste. The fourth part examines the reform law arising from the deinstitutionalization process and the characteristics of its implementation, in order to show how this process continues through implementation. In the light of these considerations, deinstitutionalization is no longer perceived as an aspect of the \"welfare crisis\", but rather as a significant pointer to new-post-welfare social policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":79940,"journal":{"name":"Health promotion (Oxford, England)","volume":"1 2","pages":"151-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/heapro/1.2.151","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deinstitutionalization, another way: the Italian mental health reform.\",\"authors\":\"O De Leonardis,&nbsp;D Mauri,&nbsp;F Rotelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/1.2.151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The article describes the Italian experience of deinstitutionalization in psychiatry, a reform which has attracted international recognition as being the only instance of an industrial society eliminating detention in a mental hospital from its range of mental health agencies and services. The first part of the article highlights the differences between the Italian experience and psychiatric reforms in Europe and the US, where deinstitutionalization has been reduced to dehospitalization. The problems and failings of these reforms are examined. The second part describes the operation, very different in content and method from the above quoted experiences, of the Italian form of deinstitutionalization. Starting from a critique of the rationalistic problem-solution \\\"paradign\\\" in psychiatry, it has developed as a complex social process which: a) involves all its subjects as active participants, b) transforms the power relationship existing between the patient (and citizen) and the institution, c) creates mental health services which completely replace detention in mental hospitals by deconstructing them and reconverting the material and human resources found in them. An example of this reconversion is given in the way in which mental health services have been organized in Trieste. The fourth part examines the reform law arising from the deinstitutionalization process and the characteristics of its implementation, in order to show how this process continues through implementation. In the light of these considerations, deinstitutionalization is no longer perceived as an aspect of the \\\"welfare crisis\\\", but rather as a significant pointer to new-post-welfare social policies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health promotion (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"151-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/heapro/1.2.151\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health promotion (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/1.2.151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health promotion (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/1.2.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

这篇文章描述了意大利在精神病学去机构化方面的经验,这一改革吸引了国际社会的认可,因为它是工业社会在其精神卫生机构和服务范围内消除精神病院拘留的唯一实例。文章的第一部分强调了意大利经验与欧洲和美国精神病学改革之间的差异,在欧洲和美国,去机构化已经减少到住院治疗。本文分析了这些改革的问题和失败之处。第二部分描述了意大利形式的去机构化的运作,在内容和方法上与上述引用的经验有很大不同。从对精神病学中理性主义的问题解决"范式"的批判开始,精神病学发展成为一个复杂的社会过程:a)将其所有主体作为积极参与者,b)改变病人(和公民)与机构之间存在的权力关系,c)创建精神卫生服务,通过解构精神病院并重新转换精神病院的物质和人力资源,完全取代拘留。在的里雅斯特组织精神保健服务就是这种重新转变的一个例子。第四部分考察了去机构化过程中产生的改革法及其实施的特点,以展示这一过程如何通过实施而持续。根据这些考虑,去机构化不再被视为“福利危机”的一个方面,而是作为新的后福利社会政策的一个重要指针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deinstitutionalization, another way: the Italian mental health reform.

The article describes the Italian experience of deinstitutionalization in psychiatry, a reform which has attracted international recognition as being the only instance of an industrial society eliminating detention in a mental hospital from its range of mental health agencies and services. The first part of the article highlights the differences between the Italian experience and psychiatric reforms in Europe and the US, where deinstitutionalization has been reduced to dehospitalization. The problems and failings of these reforms are examined. The second part describes the operation, very different in content and method from the above quoted experiences, of the Italian form of deinstitutionalization. Starting from a critique of the rationalistic problem-solution "paradign" in psychiatry, it has developed as a complex social process which: a) involves all its subjects as active participants, b) transforms the power relationship existing between the patient (and citizen) and the institution, c) creates mental health services which completely replace detention in mental hospitals by deconstructing them and reconverting the material and human resources found in them. An example of this reconversion is given in the way in which mental health services have been organized in Trieste. The fourth part examines the reform law arising from the deinstitutionalization process and the characteristics of its implementation, in order to show how this process continues through implementation. In the light of these considerations, deinstitutionalization is no longer perceived as an aspect of the "welfare crisis", but rather as a significant pointer to new-post-welfare social policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信