荷兰产科护理:家庭还是医院,助产士还是妇科医生?

R van Daalen
{"title":"荷兰产科护理:家庭还是医院,助产士还是妇科医生?","authors":"R van Daalen","doi":"10.1093/heapro/2.3.247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Dutch obstetric system is traditionally characterized by extensive primary health services, supported by more specialized care. Midwives and GPs are responsible for normal deliveries, obstetricians for the deliveries considered high risk. Home deliveries are fairly common. Over the last decade this relatively positive approach to reproduction has threatened to give place to methods that seem to oppose the goals of health promotion. The percentage of home deliveries has declined from 57% in 1970 to 35% in 1985. The distinction between normal and pathological pregnancies and deliveries has become more blurred. A growing number of women with a normal pregnancy are giving birth in hospital. In sparsely populated regions, primary health care is inadequate, but this explains only part of this development. As far as parents-to-be have a choice, little is known about their considerations and about the role of different professional groups in how they choose. Between the various medical professions, competition arises about the division of tasks and about the hierarchical relation to one another. The role of obstetricians has become more important, GPs are losing ground, while midwives retain their share in practising obstetric care. Rivalry between different professional groups has been stimulated by the decline in the birth rate and the increase in the number of professionals. The increased number of pregnant women whose pregnancy and delivery is defined as 'pathological' reflects the continuing process of medicalization. Different developments may explain this process: the increase in hospital births, progress in medical science, the older age of women having their first baby.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79940,"journal":{"name":"Health promotion (Oxford, England)","volume":"2 3","pages":"247-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/heapro/2.3.247","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dutch obstetric care: home or hospital, midwife or gynaecologist?\",\"authors\":\"R van Daalen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/2.3.247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Dutch obstetric system is traditionally characterized by extensive primary health services, supported by more specialized care. Midwives and GPs are responsible for normal deliveries, obstetricians for the deliveries considered high risk. Home deliveries are fairly common. Over the last decade this relatively positive approach to reproduction has threatened to give place to methods that seem to oppose the goals of health promotion. The percentage of home deliveries has declined from 57% in 1970 to 35% in 1985. The distinction between normal and pathological pregnancies and deliveries has become more blurred. A growing number of women with a normal pregnancy are giving birth in hospital. In sparsely populated regions, primary health care is inadequate, but this explains only part of this development. As far as parents-to-be have a choice, little is known about their considerations and about the role of different professional groups in how they choose. Between the various medical professions, competition arises about the division of tasks and about the hierarchical relation to one another. The role of obstetricians has become more important, GPs are losing ground, while midwives retain their share in practising obstetric care. Rivalry between different professional groups has been stimulated by the decline in the birth rate and the increase in the number of professionals. The increased number of pregnant women whose pregnancy and delivery is defined as 'pathological' reflects the continuing process of medicalization. Different developments may explain this process: the increase in hospital births, progress in medical science, the older age of women having their first baby.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health promotion (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"247-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/heapro/2.3.247\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health promotion (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/2.3.247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health promotion (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/2.3.247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

荷兰产科系统的传统特点是提供广泛的初级保健服务,并辅以更专业的护理。助产士和全科医生负责正常分娩,产科医生负责高风险分娩。送货上门相当普遍。在过去十年中,这种相对积极的生殖方法有可能让位于似乎与促进健康目标相抵触的方法。在家分娩的比例从1970年的57%下降到1985年的35%。正常和病理性怀孕和分娩之间的区别变得越来越模糊。越来越多正常怀孕的妇女在医院分娩。在人口稀少的地区,初级卫生保健不足,但这只是这一发展的部分原因。就准父母的选择而言,人们对他们的考虑以及不同专业团体在他们如何选择中的作用知之甚少。在不同的医疗行业之间,竞争出现在任务分工和彼此之间的等级关系上。产科医生的作用已经变得更加重要,全科医生正在失去地面,而助产士保留他们的份额在实践产科护理。出生率的下降和专业人员数量的增加刺激了不同专业群体之间的竞争。怀孕和分娩被定义为"病理"的孕妇人数增加,反映了医疗化的持续进程。不同的发展可以解释这一过程:住院分娩的增加、医学科学的进步、生育第一胎的妇女年龄的延长。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dutch obstetric care: home or hospital, midwife or gynaecologist?

The Dutch obstetric system is traditionally characterized by extensive primary health services, supported by more specialized care. Midwives and GPs are responsible for normal deliveries, obstetricians for the deliveries considered high risk. Home deliveries are fairly common. Over the last decade this relatively positive approach to reproduction has threatened to give place to methods that seem to oppose the goals of health promotion. The percentage of home deliveries has declined from 57% in 1970 to 35% in 1985. The distinction between normal and pathological pregnancies and deliveries has become more blurred. A growing number of women with a normal pregnancy are giving birth in hospital. In sparsely populated regions, primary health care is inadequate, but this explains only part of this development. As far as parents-to-be have a choice, little is known about their considerations and about the role of different professional groups in how they choose. Between the various medical professions, competition arises about the division of tasks and about the hierarchical relation to one another. The role of obstetricians has become more important, GPs are losing ground, while midwives retain their share in practising obstetric care. Rivalry between different professional groups has been stimulated by the decline in the birth rate and the increase in the number of professionals. The increased number of pregnant women whose pregnancy and delivery is defined as 'pathological' reflects the continuing process of medicalization. Different developments may explain this process: the increase in hospital births, progress in medical science, the older age of women having their first baby.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信