{"title":"CAP诉Heckler和HCFA对TEFRA法规的修改。","authors":"J R Bierig, J C Dechene","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the Court of Appeals did not invalidate the Health Care Financing Administration's TEFRA regulations, HCFA did make favorable changes in the regulations in response to the College's lawsuit. Here, the authors detail the important areas in which HCFA reversed its position during the course of the litigation, and describe other aspects of the suit.</p>","PeriodicalId":80113,"journal":{"name":"Pathologist","volume":"38 10","pages":"661-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CAP v. Heckler and HCFA's modification of TEFRA regulations.\",\"authors\":\"J R Bierig, J C Dechene\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although the Court of Appeals did not invalidate the Health Care Financing Administration's TEFRA regulations, HCFA did make favorable changes in the regulations in response to the College's lawsuit. Here, the authors detail the important areas in which HCFA reversed its position during the course of the litigation, and describe other aspects of the suit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathologist\",\"volume\":\"38 10\",\"pages\":\"661-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
CAP v. Heckler and HCFA's modification of TEFRA regulations.
Although the Court of Appeals did not invalidate the Health Care Financing Administration's TEFRA regulations, HCFA did make favorable changes in the regulations in response to the College's lawsuit. Here, the authors detail the important areas in which HCFA reversed its position during the course of the litigation, and describe other aspects of the suit.