衡量卫生干预措施的影响:对现有工具的审查。

Effective health care Pub Date : 1985-01-01
E Scrivens, D Cunningham, J Charlton, W W Holland
{"title":"衡量卫生干预措施的影响:对现有工具的审查。","authors":"E Scrivens,&nbsp;D Cunningham,&nbsp;J Charlton,&nbsp;W W Holland","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interest in the measurement of the impact of health services has been increasing for three main reasons. Policy makers and service providers wish to be reassured that they are: (i) benefitting the public for whom the service is provided; (ii) in times of economic recession and limited resources, achieving the 'best value for money'; and (iii) given the need to make economies in health expenditures, maintaining standards of the health care. Recent developments in information for the evaluation of health services have tended to emphasis the control and monitoring of expenditure in preference to the control and monitoring of quality. There is concern that this might lead to adverse consequences for patients and for the health service as a whole in that the quality of services provided might deteriorate. Health interventions are considered to be successful if they result in a beneficial change in the health of the population for whom they are provided. If the health of the population is not improved, or maintained, questions are raised about either the appropriateness of the intervention in relation to health policies which have been selected, or about the quality of the care which has been provided. Because of this, it is necessary to monitor both the outcome of a heath intervention in terms of the change in the level of health of the population, and also to measure the quality and the effectiveness of the care provided. Health services research has, over the years, developed a number of different types of measures which can be applied to health services and has suggested a number of applications for such measures in terms of the impact on the health of patients and the general population and the quality and effectiveness of health services. The first section of this paper reviews a selection of measures for both health and the effects of health interventions and discusses their applicability as management tools. The use to which such measures are put obviously depends upon the type of decisions which they are to inform, which in turn are dependent upon the organisational level at which the decision is to be made, and the policy objectives of the service to which they relate. The second part of the paper discusses factors which must be taken into account when choosing measures to monitor the impact of the health services. In examining the suitability of a management tool, a measure must be proven to provide information which is universally acceptable and which conforms to a number of scientific standards.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79874,"journal":{"name":"Effective health care","volume":"2 6","pages":"247-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the impact of health interventions: a review of available instruments.\",\"authors\":\"E Scrivens,&nbsp;D Cunningham,&nbsp;J Charlton,&nbsp;W W Holland\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interest in the measurement of the impact of health services has been increasing for three main reasons. Policy makers and service providers wish to be reassured that they are: (i) benefitting the public for whom the service is provided; (ii) in times of economic recession and limited resources, achieving the 'best value for money'; and (iii) given the need to make economies in health expenditures, maintaining standards of the health care. Recent developments in information for the evaluation of health services have tended to emphasis the control and monitoring of expenditure in preference to the control and monitoring of quality. There is concern that this might lead to adverse consequences for patients and for the health service as a whole in that the quality of services provided might deteriorate. Health interventions are considered to be successful if they result in a beneficial change in the health of the population for whom they are provided. If the health of the population is not improved, or maintained, questions are raised about either the appropriateness of the intervention in relation to health policies which have been selected, or about the quality of the care which has been provided. Because of this, it is necessary to monitor both the outcome of a heath intervention in terms of the change in the level of health of the population, and also to measure the quality and the effectiveness of the care provided. Health services research has, over the years, developed a number of different types of measures which can be applied to health services and has suggested a number of applications for such measures in terms of the impact on the health of patients and the general population and the quality and effectiveness of health services. The first section of this paper reviews a selection of measures for both health and the effects of health interventions and discusses their applicability as management tools. The use to which such measures are put obviously depends upon the type of decisions which they are to inform, which in turn are dependent upon the organisational level at which the decision is to be made, and the policy objectives of the service to which they relate. The second part of the paper discusses factors which must be taken into account when choosing measures to monitor the impact of the health services. In examining the suitability of a management tool, a measure must be proven to provide information which is universally acceptable and which conforms to a number of scientific standards.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Effective health care\",\"volume\":\"2 6\",\"pages\":\"247-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Effective health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Effective health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对衡量保健服务的影响越来越感兴趣,主要有三个原因。政策制定者和服务提供者希望得到保证,他们是:(i)使服务对象的公众受益;(ii)在经济衰退和资源有限的情况下,实现“物有所值”;(三)考虑到节约卫生支出的需要,维持卫生保健的标准。保健服务评价资料方面的最新发展趋向于强调对支出的控制和监测,而不是对质量的控制和监测。令人关切的是,这可能对病人和整个保健服务造成不利后果,因为所提供的服务质量可能会恶化。如果保健干预措施使所提供服务的人口的健康发生了有益的变化,就被认为是成功的。如果人口的健康没有得到改善或维持,就会对所选择的保健政策方面的干预是否适当提出疑问,或者对所提供的保健的质量提出疑问。因此,有必要根据人口健康水平的变化来监测保健干预的结果,并衡量所提供保健的质量和效力。多年来,保健服务研究制定了一些可适用于保健服务的不同类型的措施,并就这些措施对病人和一般人口健康的影响以及保健服务的质量和效力提出了一些应用建议。本文的第一部分回顾了健康措施和健康干预措施效果的选择,并讨论了它们作为管理工具的适用性。这些措施的使用显然取决于它们要告知的决策类型,而决策类型又取决于要做出决策的组织级别,以及与之相关的服务的政策目标。本文的第二部分讨论了在选择监测保健服务影响的措施时必须考虑的因素。在检查管理工具的适用性时,必须证明一种措施能够提供普遍可接受的信息,并且符合许多科学标准。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the impact of health interventions: a review of available instruments.

Interest in the measurement of the impact of health services has been increasing for three main reasons. Policy makers and service providers wish to be reassured that they are: (i) benefitting the public for whom the service is provided; (ii) in times of economic recession and limited resources, achieving the 'best value for money'; and (iii) given the need to make economies in health expenditures, maintaining standards of the health care. Recent developments in information for the evaluation of health services have tended to emphasis the control and monitoring of expenditure in preference to the control and monitoring of quality. There is concern that this might lead to adverse consequences for patients and for the health service as a whole in that the quality of services provided might deteriorate. Health interventions are considered to be successful if they result in a beneficial change in the health of the population for whom they are provided. If the health of the population is not improved, or maintained, questions are raised about either the appropriateness of the intervention in relation to health policies which have been selected, or about the quality of the care which has been provided. Because of this, it is necessary to monitor both the outcome of a heath intervention in terms of the change in the level of health of the population, and also to measure the quality and the effectiveness of the care provided. Health services research has, over the years, developed a number of different types of measures which can be applied to health services and has suggested a number of applications for such measures in terms of the impact on the health of patients and the general population and the quality and effectiveness of health services. The first section of this paper reviews a selection of measures for both health and the effects of health interventions and discusses their applicability as management tools. The use to which such measures are put obviously depends upon the type of decisions which they are to inform, which in turn are dependent upon the organisational level at which the decision is to be made, and the policy objectives of the service to which they relate. The second part of the paper discusses factors which must be taken into account when choosing measures to monitor the impact of the health services. In examining the suitability of a management tool, a measure must be proven to provide information which is universally acceptable and which conforms to a number of scientific standards.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信