对《塔夫脱-哈特利法案》下的员工委员会的“开明”看法。

Employee relations law journal Pub Date : 1983-12-01
M J Klaper
{"title":"对《塔夫脱-哈特利法案》下的员工委员会的“开明”看法。","authors":"M J Klaper","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled, in NLRB v. Streamway Division of the Scott and Fetzer Co., that an in-plant representation committee, unilaterally established by the employer, was not a labor organization. Until 1959, when the Supreme Court decided NLRB v. Cabot Carbon. \"labor organization\" was narrowly construed, based on the traditional adversary model of labor relations. With Cabot Carbon, and some later Board decisions, the definition has broadened. Now, at a time when many employers are turning to employee committees, quality circles, etc., as ways of improving relations with employees, the Streamway decision takes on particular significance. In the following article, the author examines the statutory basis for determining whether an employee committee is a labor organization, within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. He also discusses the judicial and Board precedent for the more liberal definition of \"labor organization\" set forth in Streamway.</p>","PeriodicalId":79590,"journal":{"name":"Employee relations law journal","volume":"9 3","pages":"474-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An 'enlightened' view of employee committees under the Taft-Hartley Act.\",\"authors\":\"M J Klaper\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled, in NLRB v. Streamway Division of the Scott and Fetzer Co., that an in-plant representation committee, unilaterally established by the employer, was not a labor organization. Until 1959, when the Supreme Court decided NLRB v. Cabot Carbon. \\\"labor organization\\\" was narrowly construed, based on the traditional adversary model of labor relations. With Cabot Carbon, and some later Board decisions, the definition has broadened. Now, at a time when many employers are turning to employee committees, quality circles, etc., as ways of improving relations with employees, the Streamway decision takes on particular significance. In the following article, the author examines the statutory basis for determining whether an employee committee is a labor organization, within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. He also discusses the judicial and Board precedent for the more liberal definition of \\\"labor organization\\\" set forth in Streamway.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employee relations law journal\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"474-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employee relations law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee relations law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,第六巡回上诉法院在NLRB诉Scott and Fetzer公司的Streamway分部一案中裁定,由雇主单方面成立的厂内代表委员会不属于劳工组织。直到1959年,最高法院判决了NLRB诉卡伯特·卡本案。“劳工组织”被狭义地解释为基于传统的劳资关系对抗模式。随着卡博特碳素公司和董事会后来的一些决定,这一定义得到了扩大。现在,当许多雇主转向员工委员会,质量圈等,作为改善与员工关系的方式时,Streamway的决定具有特别的意义。在下一篇文章中,作者探讨了在《国家劳动关系法》的意义上确定雇员委员会是否为劳工组织的法律依据。他还讨论了在Streamway中提出的对“劳工组织”更为自由的定义的司法和董事会先例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An 'enlightened' view of employee committees under the Taft-Hartley Act.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled, in NLRB v. Streamway Division of the Scott and Fetzer Co., that an in-plant representation committee, unilaterally established by the employer, was not a labor organization. Until 1959, when the Supreme Court decided NLRB v. Cabot Carbon. "labor organization" was narrowly construed, based on the traditional adversary model of labor relations. With Cabot Carbon, and some later Board decisions, the definition has broadened. Now, at a time when many employers are turning to employee committees, quality circles, etc., as ways of improving relations with employees, the Streamway decision takes on particular significance. In the following article, the author examines the statutory basis for determining whether an employee committee is a labor organization, within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. He also discusses the judicial and Board precedent for the more liberal definition of "labor organization" set forth in Streamway.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信