{"title":"\"选择自由\"法律:其对精神卫生保健服务竞争贡献的经验证据。","authors":"R G Frank","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Freedom of Choice laws have been forwarded as laws which enhance consumer choice and efficient functioning of markets for mental health services. The name of these laws constitute a misnomer, because they serve to force consumers to buy a specific type of insurance coverage. Nevertheless, under a specific set of markets conditions, the implementation of Freedom of Choice laws may increase competition and improve efficiency in the market. Empirical estimates are reported of the effect on prices of this legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":79938,"journal":{"name":"Health policy quarterly","volume":"2 2","pages":"79-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Freedom of choice\\\" laws: empirical evidence of their contribution to competition in mental health care delivery.\",\"authors\":\"R G Frank\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Freedom of Choice laws have been forwarded as laws which enhance consumer choice and efficient functioning of markets for mental health services. The name of these laws constitute a misnomer, because they serve to force consumers to buy a specific type of insurance coverage. Nevertheless, under a specific set of markets conditions, the implementation of Freedom of Choice laws may increase competition and improve efficiency in the market. Empirical estimates are reported of the effect on prices of this legislation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy quarterly\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"79-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Freedom of choice" laws: empirical evidence of their contribution to competition in mental health care delivery.
Freedom of Choice laws have been forwarded as laws which enhance consumer choice and efficient functioning of markets for mental health services. The name of these laws constitute a misnomer, because they serve to force consumers to buy a specific type of insurance coverage. Nevertheless, under a specific set of markets conditions, the implementation of Freedom of Choice laws may increase competition and improve efficiency in the market. Empirical estimates are reported of the effect on prices of this legislation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
