现代助听器的临床评价。

S D Arlinger
{"title":"现代助听器的临床评价。","authors":"S D Arlinger","doi":"10.1080/010503998420658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing complexity of the non-linear signal processing of modern hearing aids makes the use of clinical assessment of hearing aid benefit more and more important. The paper discusses the general structure of such studies with regard to choice of test subjects, reference hearing aids and the advantage of double-blind and cross-over design. Assessment should contain at least the three dimensions: perceived hearing aid benefit (preferably including perceived sound quality and preference between test and reference aids), speech recognition in noise, and electroacoustic verification by means of real-ear measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":76517,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum","volume":"49 ","pages":"50-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503998420658","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical assessment of modern hearing aids.\",\"authors\":\"S D Arlinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/010503998420658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The increasing complexity of the non-linear signal processing of modern hearing aids makes the use of clinical assessment of hearing aid benefit more and more important. The paper discusses the general structure of such studies with regard to choice of test subjects, reference hearing aids and the advantage of double-blind and cross-over design. Assessment should contain at least the three dimensions: perceived hearing aid benefit (preferably including perceived sound quality and preference between test and reference aids), speech recognition in noise, and electroacoustic verification by means of real-ear measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"50-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503998420658\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503998420658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503998420658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

现代助听器的非线性信号处理日益复杂,使得助听器的临床使用效益评估变得越来越重要。本文从实验对象的选择、参考助听器、双盲交叉设计的优势等方面论述了此类研究的总体结构。评估应至少包含三个维度:感知助听器效益(最好包括感知音质和测试助听器与参考助听器之间的偏好),噪声中的语音识别,以及通过实耳测量进行的电声验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical assessment of modern hearing aids.

The increasing complexity of the non-linear signal processing of modern hearing aids makes the use of clinical assessment of hearing aid benefit more and more important. The paper discusses the general structure of such studies with regard to choice of test subjects, reference hearing aids and the advantage of double-blind and cross-over design. Assessment should contain at least the three dimensions: perceived hearing aid benefit (preferably including perceived sound quality and preference between test and reference aids), speech recognition in noise, and electroacoustic verification by means of real-ear measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信