管饲和永久昏迷:最高法院对克鲁桑的判决。

The Medical staff counselor Pub Date : 1991-01-01
F Rouse
{"title":"管饲和永久昏迷:最高法院对克鲁桑的判决。","authors":"F Rouse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the recent case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, a majority of the United States Supreme Court voted to affirm a Missouri decision rejecting the request of guardians for removal of tubes used to provide nutrition and hydration to a woman in a persistent vegetative state. This article analyzes the Court's decision, focusing specifically on the concurring and dissenting opinions in the case, and discusses the implications of this decision for the states.</p>","PeriodicalId":79747,"journal":{"name":"The Medical staff counselor","volume":"5 1","pages":"39-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tube feeding and the permanently unconscious: the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan.\",\"authors\":\"F Rouse\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the recent case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, a majority of the United States Supreme Court voted to affirm a Missouri decision rejecting the request of guardians for removal of tubes used to provide nutrition and hydration to a woman in a persistent vegetative state. This article analyzes the Court's decision, focusing specifically on the concurring and dissenting opinions in the case, and discusses the implications of this decision for the states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Medical staff counselor\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"39-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Medical staff counselor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical staff counselor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在最近的Cruzan诉密苏里州卫生部主任一案中,美国最高法院的多数法官投票支持密苏里州的一项决定,该决定拒绝了监护人要求移除用于向持续植物人状态的妇女提供营养和水合作用的管子的请求。本文分析了最高法院的判决,特别侧重于本案中的赞同意见和反对意见,并讨论了该判决对各州的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tube feeding and the permanently unconscious: the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan.

In the recent case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, a majority of the United States Supreme Court voted to affirm a Missouri decision rejecting the request of guardians for removal of tubes used to provide nutrition and hydration to a woman in a persistent vegetative state. This article analyzes the Court's decision, focusing specifically on the concurring and dissenting opinions in the case, and discusses the implications of this decision for the states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信