疾病总成本:医疗改革的衡量标准。

D H Gustafson, C P Helstad, C F Hung, G Nelson, P Batalden
{"title":"疾病总成本:医疗改革的衡量标准。","authors":"D H Gustafson,&nbsp;C P Helstad,&nbsp;C F Hung,&nbsp;G Nelson,&nbsp;P Batalden","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systems thinking is a fundamental element of quality management and should be a fundamental element of health care reform. An implication of systems thinking is that one aim of health care should be to minimize the total costs of illness, not simply the direct medical expenditures. If we are to continue to improve health care over time, we should measure its impact on the total costs of illness to the patient, family, employer, and society. Thus a system of measurement is needed that quantifies total costs of illness and also suggests how these constituencies can collaborate to improve processes and reduce total costs. This article introduces the total costs of illness concept, contrasts it with societal costs of illness, describes a measurement system we developed to quantify it, and describes a case study examining the total costs of back injury illness to employers. We found that medical expenditures accounted for less than half of the total costs of illness, the average total costs of illness varied by over 350 percent among employers, and a simple metric (days off work) explained 62.5 percent of the variance in total costs of illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"40 1","pages":"154-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The total costs of illness: a metric for health care reform.\",\"authors\":\"D H Gustafson,&nbsp;C P Helstad,&nbsp;C F Hung,&nbsp;G Nelson,&nbsp;P Batalden\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Systems thinking is a fundamental element of quality management and should be a fundamental element of health care reform. An implication of systems thinking is that one aim of health care should be to minimize the total costs of illness, not simply the direct medical expenditures. If we are to continue to improve health care over time, we should measure its impact on the total costs of illness to the patient, family, employer, and society. Thus a system of measurement is needed that quantifies total costs of illness and also suggests how these constituencies can collaborate to improve processes and reduce total costs. This article introduces the total costs of illness concept, contrasts it with societal costs of illness, describes a measurement system we developed to quantify it, and describes a case study examining the total costs of back injury illness to employers. We found that medical expenditures accounted for less than half of the total costs of illness, the average total costs of illness varied by over 350 percent among employers, and a simple metric (days off work) explained 62.5 percent of the variance in total costs of illness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital & health services administration\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"154-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital & health services administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital & health services administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统思维是质量管理的基本要素,也应成为医疗改革的基本要素。系统思维的一个含义是,卫生保健的一个目标应该是使疾病的总成本最小化,而不仅仅是直接的医疗支出。如果我们要随着时间的推移继续改善医疗保健,我们应该衡量它对病人、家庭、雇主和社会的疾病总成本的影响。因此,需要一种测量系统来量化疾病的总成本,并建议这些群体如何合作以改进流程和降低总成本。本文介绍了疾病总成本的概念,将其与疾病的社会成本进行了对比,描述了我们开发的一种量化的测量系统,并描述了一个案例研究,检查了背部伤害疾病对雇主的总成本。我们发现,医疗支出占疾病总成本的不到一半,不同雇主的平均疾病总成本差异超过350%,一个简单的指标(休假天数)解释了疾病总成本差异的62.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The total costs of illness: a metric for health care reform.

Systems thinking is a fundamental element of quality management and should be a fundamental element of health care reform. An implication of systems thinking is that one aim of health care should be to minimize the total costs of illness, not simply the direct medical expenditures. If we are to continue to improve health care over time, we should measure its impact on the total costs of illness to the patient, family, employer, and society. Thus a system of measurement is needed that quantifies total costs of illness and also suggests how these constituencies can collaborate to improve processes and reduce total costs. This article introduces the total costs of illness concept, contrasts it with societal costs of illness, describes a measurement system we developed to quantify it, and describes a case study examining the total costs of back injury illness to employers. We found that medical expenditures accounted for less than half of the total costs of illness, the average total costs of illness varied by over 350 percent among employers, and a simple metric (days off work) explained 62.5 percent of the variance in total costs of illness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信