教育和审计可以提高住院病人对饮酒者的识别。

Health trends Pub Date : 1995-01-01
T Dent, R Shepherd, M London, G Alexander, C Duff
{"title":"教育和审计可以提高住院病人对饮酒者的识别。","authors":"T Dent,&nbsp;R Shepherd,&nbsp;M London,&nbsp;G Alexander,&nbsp;C Duff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effect of education and audit on the identification and management of medical inpatients with excessive alcohol consumptions by use of a cross-sectional survey of medical and nursing notes, compared with historical controls. We report the proportion of medical and nursing notes containing qualitative and quantitative drinking histories, the use of the CAGE questionnaire, and notification of alcohol consumption in discharge summaries. A total of 1,979 out of 2,680 (74%) notes of eligible patients were examined. The number of medical notes containing quantitative alcohol histories rose from 175/792 (22%) among historical controls, to 242/690 (35%) after training of junior medical and nursing staff, and to 241/497 (48%) after feedback of results in a clinical audit meeting. The number of medical notes with no recorded alcohol history changed from 309/792 (39%) to 287/690 (42%) to 152/497 (31%), respectively (chi 2 for trend = 97.2, p < 0.0001). The number of nursing notes containing quantified alcohol histories rose from 31/792 (4%) among historical controls, to 123/690 (18%) after training, and to 237/497 (48%) after feedback of results in a clinical audit meeting. The number of nursing notes with no recorded alcohol history fell from 309/792 (90%), to 512/690 (74%), to 205/497 (41%) respectively (chi 2 for trend = 353.7, p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients found to be drinking excessively rose from 40/792 (5.1%) to 57/690 (8.3%) to 45/497 (9.1%) (chi 2 for trend = 8.25, p = 0.004). There was little worthwhile improvement in use of the CAGE questionnaire and in discharge summaries. Education and audit are effective ways of improving the identification of excessive drinkers by both junior doctors and nurses alike. Other aspects of management are less responsive.</p>","PeriodicalId":79616,"journal":{"name":"Health trends","volume":"27 3","pages":"92-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education and audit can improve the identification of excessive drinkers among medical inpatients.\",\"authors\":\"T Dent,&nbsp;R Shepherd,&nbsp;M London,&nbsp;G Alexander,&nbsp;C Duff\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the effect of education and audit on the identification and management of medical inpatients with excessive alcohol consumptions by use of a cross-sectional survey of medical and nursing notes, compared with historical controls. We report the proportion of medical and nursing notes containing qualitative and quantitative drinking histories, the use of the CAGE questionnaire, and notification of alcohol consumption in discharge summaries. A total of 1,979 out of 2,680 (74%) notes of eligible patients were examined. The number of medical notes containing quantitative alcohol histories rose from 175/792 (22%) among historical controls, to 242/690 (35%) after training of junior medical and nursing staff, and to 241/497 (48%) after feedback of results in a clinical audit meeting. The number of medical notes with no recorded alcohol history changed from 309/792 (39%) to 287/690 (42%) to 152/497 (31%), respectively (chi 2 for trend = 97.2, p < 0.0001). The number of nursing notes containing quantified alcohol histories rose from 31/792 (4%) among historical controls, to 123/690 (18%) after training, and to 237/497 (48%) after feedback of results in a clinical audit meeting. The number of nursing notes with no recorded alcohol history fell from 309/792 (90%), to 512/690 (74%), to 205/497 (41%) respectively (chi 2 for trend = 353.7, p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients found to be drinking excessively rose from 40/792 (5.1%) to 57/690 (8.3%) to 45/497 (9.1%) (chi 2 for trend = 8.25, p = 0.004). There was little worthwhile improvement in use of the CAGE questionnaire and in discharge summaries. Education and audit are effective ways of improving the identification of excessive drinkers by both junior doctors and nurses alike. Other aspects of management are less responsive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health trends\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"92-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过对医疗和护理记录的横断面调查,调查教育和审计对过量饮酒住院患者的识别和管理的影响,并与历史对照进行比较。我们报告了包含定性和定量饮酒史的医疗和护理记录的比例,CAGE问卷的使用,以及出院总结中饮酒的通知。在2680份符合条件的患者病历中,共有1979份(74%)被检查。包含定量酒精病史的病历数量从历史对照组的175/792(22%)上升到初级医护人员培训后的242/690(35%),在临床审核会议上反馈结果后的241/497(48%)。无酒精病史的医疗记录数量分别从309/792(39%)、282 /690(42%)和152/497(31%)变化(chi 2表示趋势= 97.2,p < 0.0001)。包含量化酒精病史的护理笔记数量从历史对照组的31/792(4%)增加到培训后的123/690(18%),在临床审核会议上反馈结果后增加到237/497(48%)。无酒精病史的护理记录数分别从309/792(90%)、512/690(74%)、205/497(41%)下降(chi 2,趋势= 353.7,p < 0.0001)。饮酒过度的比例从40/792(5.1%)上升到57/690(8.3%),再上升到45/497 (9.1%)(chi 2,趋势= 8.25,p = 0.004)。在使用CAGE问卷和出院总结方面没有什么值得改进的地方。教育和审计是提高初级医生和护士对过量饮酒者的识别的有效方法。管理的其他方面则反应迟钝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education and audit can improve the identification of excessive drinkers among medical inpatients.

This study investigated the effect of education and audit on the identification and management of medical inpatients with excessive alcohol consumptions by use of a cross-sectional survey of medical and nursing notes, compared with historical controls. We report the proportion of medical and nursing notes containing qualitative and quantitative drinking histories, the use of the CAGE questionnaire, and notification of alcohol consumption in discharge summaries. A total of 1,979 out of 2,680 (74%) notes of eligible patients were examined. The number of medical notes containing quantitative alcohol histories rose from 175/792 (22%) among historical controls, to 242/690 (35%) after training of junior medical and nursing staff, and to 241/497 (48%) after feedback of results in a clinical audit meeting. The number of medical notes with no recorded alcohol history changed from 309/792 (39%) to 287/690 (42%) to 152/497 (31%), respectively (chi 2 for trend = 97.2, p < 0.0001). The number of nursing notes containing quantified alcohol histories rose from 31/792 (4%) among historical controls, to 123/690 (18%) after training, and to 237/497 (48%) after feedback of results in a clinical audit meeting. The number of nursing notes with no recorded alcohol history fell from 309/792 (90%), to 512/690 (74%), to 205/497 (41%) respectively (chi 2 for trend = 353.7, p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients found to be drinking excessively rose from 40/792 (5.1%) to 57/690 (8.3%) to 45/497 (9.1%) (chi 2 for trend = 8.25, p = 0.004). There was little worthwhile improvement in use of the CAGE questionnaire and in discharge summaries. Education and audit are effective ways of improving the identification of excessive drinkers by both junior doctors and nurses alike. Other aspects of management are less responsive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信